Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Roberts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 06:44 PM
Original message
John Roberts
Can someone please explain me to how we can possibly block the nomination of John Roberts via filibuster when Antonin Scalia was confirmed 98-0 in 1986 when the Democrats controlled the Senate....


The president appoints nominees and the senate advises and consent....

Even if all forty four or forty five Democratic senators withhold their consent Roberts would still be confirmed...

I have read some of his opinions... He's no better or worse than your typical Republican lawyer and doesn't seem to be a total wingnut like Scalia or Thomas....

Unfortunately the Republicans control every apparatus of government and the only way out of our current dilemma is to elect more Democrats....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Son of California Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. or......................
do such a good job of digging up dirt on this guy that we totally sway public opinion against him.
Let our leaders stand back and be dignified, while the bloggers and the rest of the media show this guy for the screwball he is.
He's already doing shitty in the polls. Give us a month to tear him down. Repub senators will vote against him if they feel the pressure from the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If Scalia Was Confirmed 98-0
a candidate would have to be to the right of Genghis Khan to be defeated.....

the Scalia vote should be sobering to everybody....

he was vetted by the FBI in 2003 before going on the DC court so presumably if there were skeletons in his closet that would have been uncovered then...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's called balance. We have to stop allowing rigid, agenda
driven individuals who are ironically incapable of making fair, coherent decisions.

Simply put, they are not fair. The most important qualification of a judge is to utilize fairness and impartiality in every one of his decisions.

Scalia may to some be scholarly and well-versed in law, but he doesn't value fairness like he seems to value the Conservative agenda. Roberts looks to be even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 21st 2014, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC