Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another brutal day at the office for Scottie....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:43 AM
Original message
Another brutal day at the office for Scottie....
(...)

Q Does the President equate the word "leaking" to a crime, as best you know, in his mind? Just the use of the word "leaking," does he see that as a criminal standard? And is the only threshold for firing someone involved being charged with a crime?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, we all serve at the pleasure of the President in this White House. The President -- you heard what he had to say on the matter. He was asked a specific question, and you heard his response.

Q Is leaking, in your judgment of his interpretation, a crime?

MR. McCLELLAN: I'll leave it at what the President said.

Go ahead.

Q What is his problem? Two years, and he can't call Rove in and find out what the hell is going on? I mean, why is it so difficult to find out the facts? It costs thousands, millions of dollars, two years, it tied up how many lawyers? All he's got to do is call him in.

MR. McCLELLAN: You just heard from the President. He said he doesn't know all the facts. I don't know all the facts.

Q Why?

MR. McCLELLAN: We want to know what the facts are. Because --

Q Why doesn't he ask him?

MR. McCLELLAN: I'll tell you why, because there's an investigation that is continuing at this point, and the appropriate people to handle these issues are the ones who are overseeing that investigation. There is a special prosecutor that has been appointed. And it's important that we let all the facts come out. And then at that point, we'll be glad to talk about it, but we shouldn't be getting into --

Q You talked about it to reporters.

MR. McCLELLAN: We shouldn't be getting into prejudging the outcome.

Go ahead.

Q Scott, we don't know all the facts, but we know some of the facts. For example, Matt Cooper says he did speak to Karl Rove and Lewis Libby about these issues. So given the fact that you have previously stood at that podium and said these men did not discuss Valerie Plame or a CIA agent's identity in any way, does the White House have a credibility problem?

(...)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/07/20050718-2.html

More admiration for Helen Thomas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. What reporters should be digging out...
... now is the slip signed by Bush authorizing Snotty to receive combat pay. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. He gets Big Bucks to stonewall /deflect/decieve/Babble, and take the heat.
He too is a whore....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. "all previous statements are inoperative"

Maybe we should just call Scottie by his alter ego name, Ron
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorFlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. "does the White House have a credibility problem?"
Yup.



:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. roasted like a chestnut, according to BuzzFlash
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Boiled like a toad!
:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. What's up with this Les person?
Go ahead, Les.

Q Scott, Jack Kelly of The Pittsburgh Post Gazette notes that the Intelligence Identities Protection Act defines a covert agent as someone working undercover overseas. He notes Valerie Plame has manned a desk at the CIA headquarters since 1997, while Mark Stein of the Chicago Sun Times notes that Valerie's husband conceded on CNN that she is not a clandestine officer and hasn't been one for six years, so leaking her CIA connection did not endanger her life or comprise her mission.

And my question -- I have a follow up -- would you or the President or Karl Rove disagree with these two nationally syndicated columnists?

Liar, liar, pants on fire!

Valerie's husband conceded no such thing!

In fact, Wilson merely emphasized that his wife's cover was blown at the moment Novak revealed her identity in a July 2003 column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. He's crazy
I'm serious, he's really insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Nope, sorry but...
.. it's not brutal when at the end of the press briefing some asshole says "but on a personal not, Scott.. how're you holding up?"

They have to be relentless and not feel sorry for that fuck stick piece of shit. He's a liar plain and simple. Would you feel compassion for a serial liar when he feeds you bullshit every single day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC