Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Joe Wilson ever lied, or shown to be wrong?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:23 PM
Original message
Has Joe Wilson ever lied, or shown to be wrong?
Has he said anything that could be construed as being incorrect?

It always seems that he has been vindicated in all his statements. The conservatives must have some reason that they say he's unreliable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. In this matter? Not that I know of
I'm sure he's lied or been wrong before though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. If I remeber correctly, he said his wife was not involved in his..
...selection for the Niger mission, but the bipartisan Senate report found that she was the one who proposed to send him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiona Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not true
First off, the "bipartisan senate report" doesn't say any such thing. The additional comments by three right-wing senators made that claim, and made it falsely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. proposing and sending are two different things
imho.

someone else surely gave the thumbs up if the word 'proposed' was used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. You are correct! I think the charge was that JW said she was not involved.
So if she was involved, he would not be telling the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That report sourced a BOGUS MEMO -- please see below, WAPO article
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 02:55 PM by emulatorloo
Republicants on the committee made a lot of hay out of a bogus memo -- note that this is the same memo Gannon was shopping around.

I am citing this 12/26/03 Washington Post article:

<snip>

Sources said the CIA is angry about the circulation of a still-classified document to conservative news outlets suggesting Plame had a role in arranging her husband's trip to Africa for the CIA. The document, written by a State Department official who works for its Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), describes a meeting at the CIA where the Niger trip by Wilson was discussed, said a senior administration official who has seen it.

CIA officials have challenged the accuracy of the INR document, the official said, because the agency officer identified as talking about Plame's alleged role in arranging Wilson's trip could not have attended the meeting.

"It has been circulated around," one official said. CIA and State Department officials have refused to discuss the document.

<snip>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A30842-2003Dec25¬Found=true

____________________________________________________________________________

See also this DU thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4130264


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Thanks for that 2003 article!
I was referring to the Senate intelligence report alluded to by the out-of-date article:

"The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is also preparing a report that is likely to cover both Wilson's mission to Niger and the subsequent leak of Plame's name. The report is still months from completion, officials said."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. She "offered up his name"
to quote the Senate report. She's not the decision maker; it wasn't her place to make the selection.

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/13jul20041400/www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/creports/pdf/s108-301/sec2.pdf#page=4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. She wasn't involved in the SELECTION, she introduced him
as a candidate without anyone knowing they were married. She made the introduction, stayed 3 minutes, then left the room. He was perfect for the job. LOL!

At least that's what I've gleaned from various sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. I linked to the Senate Intelligence Report in post #21
Your sources were right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do the conservatives ever need a reason to say someone is...
unreliable. They say that about everyone critical of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. that is the illusion they are trying to create
because he was all over the non-WMD issue. they want to try and make him seem unreliable so when all his work is 'exposed' they can say his findings are unreliable too. personally, i think he is a badass good guy;) didn't he square off with saddam hussein and bring his own noose when SH said he was going to hang him high? that's better than dirty harry, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think it is largely a GOP distortion campaign
to discredit Wilson.

For example, one of their big talking points is that Wilson lied when he said Cheney sent him on the mission.

Then when you go back through Wilson's actual statements, he didn't actually claim this. He made references where he believed Cheney was interested in seeing his findings, but didn't claim Cheney actually sent him.

With everything that's been said, I can't say there isn't anything where Wilson was wrong. Wislon was right on the key points here, primarily that the administration was misusing CIA data to falsely claim there was WMD, and that the White House was retaliating against him by releasing information on his wife being a CIA operative. If he was wrong on any minor points in all of this, it is rather trivial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, just like Michael Schiavo murdered Terri . nt
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 02:38 PM by Quixote1818
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. No, but as John Kerry, Tom Daschle, Max Cleland, and Al Gore
will attest, truth means nothing in SmirkWorld
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Has the GOP or Karl Rove ever lied, or shown to be wrong?
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 02:47 PM by emulatorloo
is probably a question which will get more affirmatives.

"Joe Wilson is a liar" is a big smoke screen -- concocted by the GOP through misquoting and twisting facts.

www.talkingpointsmemo.com is tracking some of the GOP lies

This site too:

http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/004870.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is like asking the girl who was raped if she's ever had sex before
And one would hope that if Bush regime goes down that path that someone fights back and questions why this would be important.

I'm sure Joe Wilson has lied. But we have evidence that shows that in this particular instance - Joe Wilson is telling the truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. "The conservatives must have some reason that they say he is
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 02:57 PM by missb
unreliable?"

:rofl:

Since when did the right-wing noise machine ever need to tell the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes they do have a reason - THEY WILL SAY WHATEVER IT TAKES
to stay in power. There is no lie too low for them if it is effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittykitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Link to his editorial in the NY Times 7/6/03
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. A Republican who doesn't lie --
of course the conservatives find him unreliable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. Read it for yourself (start on page 46)
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 05:28 PM by FLDem5
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2004_rpt/ssci_iraq.pdf

Page 49 has the details about who suggested he go. It is a really good read, if you have the time!

Pages 54 and 55 go into what he told them about Niger and how Saddam couldn't get his hands on any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Thanks. It says his wife suggested him on page 49.
According the bipartisan report, interviews and documents indicate it was his wife.

Thanks for the link!

Here's the official link:
http://intelligence.senate.gov/iraqreport2.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC