Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOL!!!! Freepers - The Plot Thickens – Matthew Cooper lied.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:47 PM
Original message
LOL!!!! Freepers - The Plot Thickens – Matthew Cooper lied.
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 12:48 PM by Quixote1818
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1444803/posts


What a bunch of dullards! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please tell me what I need to know.
MY retina's may burn if I head over there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. They just don't get it about Judith Miller
Judith Miller is a true neo-con who is really tight with this administration

To: Pukin Dog
Everytime one of these Clymers tries to stick Rove with this mess, someone needs to ask them: So Judith Miller is in jail protecting her source, Karl Rove?
Which is exactly what they are pushing. If Rove is the source, then Miller is in jail because she didn't want to disclose him as her source.

If anyone believes that, I have several bridges in NYC and the San Francisco area to sell them.


53 posted on 07/17/2005 10:37:38 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The MSM is trying to make us believe, Judith Miller is in jail to protect Karl Rove!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Hrm...
"If anyone believes that, I have several bridges in NYC and the San Francisco area to sell them."

Aren't there laws against false advertising online?

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Freeper buys bridges
And is always trying to unload them on someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Here is what Judith Miller would do in a perfect world...
"The pudgy deputy chief of staff told me that Valerie Plame was a CIA operative"

"The vice-president told me that Valerie Plame was a secret CIA operative."

She gets out of jail, without "naming" her sources.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Excellent point!!!
Tell the freepers exactly that!

"The pudgy deputy chief of staff told me that Valerie Plame was a CIA operative"

"The vice-president told me that Valerie Plame was a secret CIA operative."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. Freeper doesn't remember that Miller pushed Bush's Iraq War for him??????
Freeper doesn't remember that Bush's buddy, Chalabi, gave Miller the WMD information, just as planned?

Do they think Chalabi chose to give the WMD's in Iraq story to Miller by picking her name out of a hat? BushInc SENT Chalabi to Miller because she was their operative at the NYT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. What strikes me about FR posts
Is how little they have to go on. It's all about Bush bashing to them. Even that political cartoon is pointless - no punchline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Before anyone asks me, none of the above is the product of my personal
opinion."

Because they're not ALLOWED to have personal opinions, duh!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, he's right about one thing...

We'll definitely be looking at the nominees leanings on security and sheild law.

But he's got the causality ass-backwards. We'll be criticising the SCOTUS nominee not as a goal, but as a way to steer attention back to the Plame Affair.

Heheh.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:53 PM
Original message
So why isn't Scott McClellan saying that?
They miss the biggest evidence of Bushco's guilt:

THEY AREN'T DENYING IT.

A big inflected DUH there. If Fitz had nothing, then wouldn't Scottie McClellan day and night be saying what he said MONTHS ago, that he talked to everyone, and they are all innocent?

That the president has confidence in Rove, who is innocent?

That Rove's innocence will be proven?

Etc.?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Geez, I followed your link and now I have Freeper cooties on my
computer. I wonder if I should just do the merciful thing and take it out back and shoot it, put it out of OUR misery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's not about Rove--it's about the Supreme Court!
Um, no--it's about the pleasure I'll get from watching Rove, Cheney, Bush, Rice, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld and the rest of the neo-con ghouls do the FROG-MARCH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Got that right.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Of course, they believe Rove's spin
"The desperate far-left continues to demonstrate their pathological lying. Creating a false reality if the core of their existence -- the Clinton mafia was proof positive of the gaining momentum of this perversion that keeps the kool-air drinkers at their side....along with the compicit MSM as noted in this shining example.

Open your eyes and ears America -- and wake up to the reality of the criminal left."

If I reconfigure, does it sound better?

The desperate far-right continues to demonstrate their pathological lying. Creating a false reality if the core of their existence -- the Bush mafia is proof positive of the gaining momentum of this perversion that keeps the kool-air drinkers at their side....along with the compicit MSM as noted in this shining example.

Open your eyes and ears America -- and wake up to the reality of the criminal right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. What the fuck is that guy talking about?
Typical freeper desperation post, it includes Clinton and is for the most part illegible.

:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. They really have a hard-on for the Clintons, don't they.
Sometimes I am amazed at their ability to insert Bill and Hillary into any situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. 2+2=....2
"Rove never mentioned the woman’s name, only that Wilson’s wife worked for the CIA. He never said who that woman was".




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Right. Even though they were married
no one KNEW they were married. None of their friends or business contacts or her contacts as an undercover op knew they were married, and no one could have figured it out EVER, no way--unless they knew how to perform a Google search, of course. Therefore, it's all Bill Clinton's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Freeper Logic...Where's Steely Dan???
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 01:03 PM by KharmaTrain
I hope someone is saving these gems in some file or private server. The stuff over there is material that will make a great book in a couple years. We'll gladly pay big money to laugh our asses off again at these "last throes".

BTW...did anyone note this gem at the end of that post?

Before anyone asks me, none of the above is the product of my personal opinion.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Pukin...
is exactly what that guy is doing. And, now, having read it, I'm pukin'. What a dumbass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. I swear this is the truth
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 01:12 PM by Uncle Joe
I was reading his post and thinking to my self, how could someone write this without :puke: , I scanned to the top of the post after finishing and only then realized his name was Pukin dog; that explains it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. So Pukin Dog is a mouthpiece for someone else?
How wierd. Posting that BS, then saying it's someone else's words. I wonder who he's covering for? Or is he just an RNC plant that's giving himself enough slack so he can later say, "hey, I told you you it wasn't my words". Talk about spinning....

PD seems to be quite involved in posting on this....I'm betting he's tied into the RNC. Rallying the braindead...good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. At first I thought he was being sarcastic
That was strange.


:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. I swear
those folks are all over the place.

I had at least one or two devoted to monitoring me back when I posted on my local community forum. They were total pains in the ass.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. Priceless !
This post just says it all about these idiots that cheer this mis-administration on...

To: Pukin Dog
You are absolutely right that this is about the Supreme Court and the RAT effort to undermine any conservative nominee. But they are only damaging themselves by jumping in bed with Joe Wilson. Most Americans can easily see that Wilson is underhanded and greasy. His wife is a dirty bureaucrat who funneled tax dollars into her husband's African junkent so he could write "Bush lied" in the New York Times. Good grief, the RATS are so out of touch they think we have sympathy for dirtbags that scheme to undermine our troops during a war.



10 posted on 07/17/2005 9:58:09 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainman99 Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. He has no motive to lie. Rove does.
Cooper could have just gone along with the 'Novak told me'
story. Novak already has a deal and Cooper knew he'd
be bashed by the Repugs for telling the truth. Motive
is the central piece of this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's true because he says it is.
He knows these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC