ButterflyBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-05 01:24 PM
Original message |
| Hey Bush, remember that Osama guy? |
|
The guy who was behind the destruction of the World Trade Center? The guy who was most likely behind the bombings in Bali and Madrid? Didn't you promise to bring him in?
Oh wait, your worthless incompetant ass couldn't, so you had to go off and attack a random country that had absolutely nothing to do with him. Now you got Saddam, so the world's all safer right?
OH I GUESS WE FOUND OUT TODAY IT'S NOT. YOUR WORTHLESS ASS KEPT WASTING TIME SOMEWHERE ELSE RATHER THAN CATCH THE GUY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TERRORIST ATTACKS, AND NOW MORE HAS COME.
All the proof that Bush and his "War on Terror" are just giant massive FAILURES.
|
nytemare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Kerry said it. We went in to Afghanistan with 40,000 troops. They should play that fucking video of Bush saying "I'm really no that concerned about him" OVER AND OVER AGAIN!!
|
HughBeaumont
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Let's put it flatly: There IS no "Warn Terr" |
|
It never started. Hijackers were of Saudi and Egyptian descent, funded by Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and trained there and on US naval bases. So who do we attack? IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN. And that whole thing in Iraq - it's like pre-spraying the kitchen counter for ants by using old orange juice.
Do the British feel safer in their nation knowing their Prime Sinister is riding the BFEE shitwagon known as the "So Called War On Terror"? Somehow, I DON'T think they do today. And neither do we.
|
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. You mean the guy he doesn't waste his time "worrying" about? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 24th 2013, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message |