NYT Editorial Page likens Miller to Rosa Parks and MLK!!!!!

[Melodybe]

here is a link to the dailykos diary:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/7/7/34243/34765#8

OMFG!!! My blood pressure is literally up like ten points just reading that shit!!!

FUCK THE NEW YORK TIMES!! HOW FUCKING DARE THEY!!!

Please call and bitch these fuckers out, I know they will be hearing from me tomorrow.

NY Office: 212 556 1234
DC Office: 202 862 0324


FUCK THEM!! Just fuck those assholes!

[brettdale]

1. There is no hope

There is no hope.

[Melodybe]

3. Don't say that, I wrote off the NYT in 2000, haven't counted on them

since. So no loss to me, but the fucking gall makes my head spin.

After five years of this shit, how they can find new ways to infuriate me is shocking.

Just call and bitch them out.

This time I'm not sparing the secretary or receptionist, they work for these evil fuckers and they're getting an earful.

[still_one]

2. i have a better idea

if you subscribe to the NY times, cancel

explain that the NY times is responsible for spreading the lies which got us involved in Iraq, and that they along with the MSM have missed the opportunity to be journalists, instead of a tool for an administration

support progressive media

[Crunchy Frog]

4. .

Sorry. I can't think of anything else to say.

[lvx35]

5. What isn't that what Rosa Parks did?

She was fighting for the right of poor old black women to out CIA agents, don't you remember?

[Melodybe]

6. ARRG!!!! I hate these people!

[enigmatic]

7. ok, that made me laugh

But I'm still sickened, but not surprised, by what NYT wrote. Par for the course.

[girl gone mad]

8. I honestly think there will be a backlash..

against the way the media is portraying this case.

Call me crazy, but I think most people understand that outing a CIA agent is a bad thing and covering up for the person who outed a CIA agent isn't a laudable action.

[tmorelli415]

9. MUCK RAKERS!!! There's a Difference...

between protecting a source who legally provides information that leads to public awareness of a story that is in the interest of good government - and protecting a source who illegally leaks information that serves no purpose in promoting the public interest!

The specific information that Miller published served absolutely no purpose toward better government! It was simply sensational information that was completely irrelevant to the larger story.

Protecting a whistle blower is admirable. Protecting a felon is criminal.

To compare her to Rosa Parks and MLK is to compare falsely shouting 'fire' in a crowded theatre, to calling 9-1-1 to report that your neighbor's house is ablaze!

The woman is in jail where she ought to be. And if editors at the NYT don't know the difference between the public trust and a personal vendetta, they are nothing but muck rakers.