If there's any truth to this.....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

[eauclaireliberal]

Supreme Court justice
faces boot from home?
Developer wants 'Lost Liberty Hotel' built upon property of David Souter

>>>A private developer contacted the local government in Supreme Court Justice David Souter's hometown in New Hampshire yesterday asking that the property of the judge – who voted in favor of a controversial decision allowing a city to take residents' homes for private development – be seized to make room for a new hotel.

Logan Darrow Clements faxed a request to Chip Meany, the code enforcement officer of the town of Weare, N.H., seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road, the present location of Souter's home.<<<

Press Release

[LightningFlash]

1. Can you say.....Karma?

....Oh how it is such sweet, sweet sorrow. :evilgrin:

[eauclaireliberal]

3. RE: "Can you say.....Karma?"

What would be even more sweet...maybe New York will allow building a new tollway where Scalia's home is.

Or maybe Milwaukee Co. could approve a plan to put a shoe store over Rhenquist's childhood home.

The possibilities are endless.

[LynneSin]

2. Come on you guys, this is from the World Nut Daily

and if you read the entire brief (or even the highlights of it) you'll know what Souter and others supported was basically the right of the local government to make these decisions and not the federal government.

NSMA had an excellent post with the details of this decision and the most important thing in the thread was that it is easier to fight your local goverment than the federal one

[DS1]

4. I see a kickback within an overpayment for his house from the city

It's easier than selling.

Can you tell I don't trust anyone?