Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Penalties for those lacking health insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:26 PM
Original message
Penalties for those lacking health insurance
WHO IS THIS ASSHOLE/

Massachusetts residents who choose not to obtain health insurance would face tax penalties and even the garnishing of their wages under a proposal Governor Mitt Romney unveiled yesterday.

Romney says the ''individual mandate" he is proposing, part of his broader plan to cover the roughly 500,000 people who are uninsured, would not cost the state any money. But some healthcare specialists say the approach might cost hundreds of millions of dollars more than state taxpayers currently provide for government health coverage.

Romney's plan would require all residents in Massachusetts to have some form of health insurance or agree to pay their medical bills out of their own pockets. No other state has such a requirement, and if Romney manages to make it law, it would be a compelling accomplishment he could point to if he runs for president.

Currently, people without health insurance often go to hospitals and receive care they never pay for, because the hospital and the state pick up the tab. Under Romney's proposal, uninsured Massachusetts residents would be asked to enroll in a plan when they seek care.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/06/22/romney_eyes_penalties_for_those_lacking_insurance?mode=PF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Way to stick it to the working poor
Asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. How much more does the poor have to be penalized for being poor? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. And if you are out of work or work at WALMART at WALMART wages
what do you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yeah, Wal-Mart should pick up the health costs of their employees
instead of making them buy into a plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Wal-Mart lets taxpayers pay.
Thousands of Wal-Mart employees across the country are forced to rely on Medicaid despite the fact that their employer makes billions in profits.

It's a perfect example of the despicable capitalist abuse known as "Socializing the costs, privatizing the profits."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. How would this work? Under what plan?
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 03:31 PM by philosophie_en_rose
The only people to benefit from this is the insurance companies. They don't pay hospitals the full cost of care either.

Also, if it's a crime to not have a plan or to not pay the fines for not having a plan, the state pays for jail healthcare anyway.

This stinks of insurance company lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. What part of
'you can't get blood from a turnip' do these assholes not understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarenInMA Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hello
He is planning on running for president, he announced yesterday.

Which is funny, because we all hate him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitrusLib Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh, this is part of that compassionate conservatism, right?
:eyes:

Mit Romney is a schmuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. he leaned to penalized people from Bush!!--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Geez, this country is starting to suck like an old Hoover
Where are all these fucking lizards coming from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Wrong!
Old Hoovers don't have much suction!

He sucks like a brand new Hoover! (Plenty of sucksion)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. THAT'S OUR ASSHOLE. You want 'em? He's yours. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saphire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. the one and only time I took one of my uninsured children to
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 03:39 PM by lady of texas
the county hospital here in San Antonio, I got billed for the whole $2000.00. The only help the county gave me was letting me pay in installments. No free health care here! No insurance, your screwed. Next time,if there is one, I will go to the hospital closest to home, and not have to wait for 20 hours. The cost will be the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Are you saying you did not get "network negotiated" reduced charges..?
...since you were not in a "health plan". I am aware that happens.
BTW, welcome to our message board!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. I knew this would be their approach to health care.
As if it's "rich" people "choosing" not to buy insurance that are responsible for driving up health care costs in this country. How can these people face the public and be so intellectually dishonest? How?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sounds a awful lot like the bankruptcy bill doesn't it?? Can't pay
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 03:44 PM by MsUSA
they'll make you find a way. Gawd, I'm starting to think more about moving to Canada. *sigh* Where is the moral value in this system. It's just sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. How redundant:
they're already paying big penalties, whenever they get ill, or whenever preventive health could keep them from getting ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. People like this are out of touch with reality
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 03:53 PM by depakid
proposals like this that seek to expand the risk pools look nice and neat on paper and have all sorts of pretty graphs proving how they'd work, but frequently lack any application to real life situations.

The underlying concepts are sound- but Republicans are simply too stupid or cowardly to accept rational economics the way it actually works. They cling to ideology like babies to blankets and are afraid to make the tough choices required to make programs work- which invariably involve cutting the parasites out of the healthcare system.

Simply coercing people to purchase insurance without setting affordable rates does little to add value back into the system- it simply increases the share of waste that insurers spend on administrative costs (or executive perks) and 'recouping costs' from tax returns reduces disposable income that would be used to buy goods and services in other parts of the local communities- degrading the multiplier effects that go along with money changing hands.

It's a net loser in the end- and it doesn't take a genius to see it....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newswolf56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. As I said on the first thread about this, we are already...
...afflicted nationally by such a penalize-the-poor plan: the BushCo Medicare Prescription Drug Lord Benefit Plan, which fines you one percent of your pension for every month you refuse to participate.

The reason BushCo imposed this compulsory measure is that the Medicare Prescription Drug Lord Benefit Plan will double or triple the prescription drug costs of a great many seniors. The money will be funneled directly to the prescription drug lords, obscenely inflating their already pornographic profits.

Thus a lot of folks angrily oppose it -- can't afford it -- but are being viciously bullied by the government into signing on. (Indeed I am one of these people: the BushCo Medicare Prescription Drug Lord Benefit Plan will nearly double my annual prescription costs.)

Adding to the outrage, this is what the Greedy Old Plutocrats (GOP) call "voluntary."

Once again, we see how the GOP will do absolutely everything in their (ever increasing) power to maliciously worsen the lot of working families and lower income folks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcass1954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Romney, like most repugs, misses one very important point...
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 04:00 PM by kcass1954
Most people do not choose to not have health insurance, much like they do not choose to be jobless, homeless, hungry, etc. If there was any way that they could get insurance, and if they could possibly afford to pay the premiums, they would already have it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. They did it with auto insurance...
By law you have to have it or face serious consequences. Now they're going to do it with health insurance...

Just think how much money you'd have right now if there was a law requiring everyone to buy your product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC