Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Want a good laugh? Go to Clark's web sitemap,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:11 AM
Original message
Want a good laugh? Go to Clark's web sitemap,
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 12:36 AM by Jim Sagle
http://www.clark04.com/sitemap.php and click the "On the Issues" link.

Ya gotta love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why doesn't that surprise me?
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kind of says a lot.
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 12:46 AM by Tinoire
Under construction?


Just what is under construction? The issues? The candidate? What?


Sorry Clark supporters but damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. Hey, I'm a Clark supporter and I think it's pretty bad form
To have an "Issues" link under construction.
From both a political and website perspective.
Sheesh.

Well, I hope his campaign gets their shit together.
As late as he's entering the race, he's gonna have
to get a lot of momentum and money real real fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. If I were on Clark's campaign
I would certainly send the web-master a hint.

I think Clark will get plenty of money. Soros is already fully behind him. But, objectively, I hope his campaign gets their act together too, for the sake of his supporters who have been doing their damndest to pump him up without the proper materials.

I won't say this often because I'm no fan of Clark's but good luck. I'd hate to see so many passionate supporters let down.

I'm sure they'll get their act together in time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Good idea Tinoire
I just emailed the webmaster and suggested
they update the Issues link.

Rookies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Aw shucks!
You're just gonna ruin all our fun ;)

He should at least link to another Clark site that has that up in the interim.

Take care... Good luck... We'll be fighting in the next Clark thread but I like your style Myra!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
47. It doesn't surprise me that Soros is buying "our" candidate
I wondered just exactly where he was going to mount his campaign.

There has to be more in it for the Democratic voters than just beating Bush....like, what the Democrats want and who they choose to nominate without being strongarmed by the party elite that would pitch a frontman to preserve their power base---and we know how well that has been working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
59. Who is Soros?
? I've hear the name but don't know who it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
38. Wow. Clark actually likes to study the issues in order to make an
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 05:15 AM by Skwmom
informed decision. I just don't know what to make of this.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. If he doesn't know where he stands
What draws him supporters?

I have nothing for or against Clark. I am undecided overall.

The truth is, he isn't undecided, his webpage isn't updated. Lets not spin it into a "in-depth and wise mulling of the issues". If he was that clueless, he wouldn't have announced.

One would think that would be an important page to have completed as soon as possible as that is probably the most used link on such a page.

I chalk this up to poor webpage planning than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #38
52. maybe he should have studied before announcing his candidacy,
during those long months when all the other candindates were campaigning, but Clark was gazing at his navel, trying to remember which party he belonged to, and playing "flirt".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
54. OUCH!
I'm a potential supporter and definately DID laugh!

They better get their collective asses in gear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Under construction?
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 12:17 AM by dralston
They're working on the site. How is that interesting?

Try http://draftwesleyclark.com/on_the_issues.htm for now.



Edit: Added alternate link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Edited: I'm going to be nice
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 12:31 AM by Tinoire



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. That's a supporter's link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
60. Yeah that's a little bothersome to me...


After all the shit Dean supporters have gotten, some of it from Clark supporters... it just does not sit right with me that ALL of Clark's presentation is being done for him by supporters, not by him.

It is like the supporters came up with the best candidate they could, and now want Clark to jump in and play the part.

I want to hear from the man himself... not his booster club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. oh, I donno
maybe it's funny because a man is running for the most
powerful office on the planet, and he doesn't have any
positions on issues, no experience in politics and has
never run for anything, not even dog catcher.

Didn't we just do that with Shrub?
Oh, and that turned out so well.

*you'd think we were electing prom king, no wonder
the rest of the planet laughs their asses off at us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Don't think so!
Shrub had EXPERINCE as governor of one of the largest states.
Shrub had POSITIONS on the issues (that were lies).
Shrub had RUN for Congress and Governor.

How did that help him not be a miserable failure?

Factually, you are incorrect.

It all comes down to LEADERSHIP and that's what Clark offers. If the Clark people need a little time to put together a clear and concise position statement, what's the big deal?

I conceed, however, that if you interpret UNDER CONSTRUCTION to mean the positions and not merely the website then it is mildly amusing! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. wow!
your right! Shrub is far more experienced than Clak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. You don't get it.
A lack of experience in the corrupt political machine is a selling point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick of Bullshit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
43. Has the good general figured out what his position on Iraq is yet?
Or is Mary going to get back to us on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
48. No but
he has lifetime career experience in the military-industrial machine.

No thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
55. clark's "leadership" experience comes from a culture of obedience
... where people are required to follow the orders of those above. there's no evidence in his background of the kind of "leadership" required in a civilian, electoral politics situation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
65. Exactly!
Websites pull that kind of stuff all the time. When I first tried to set up my own homepage (don't ask for the URL, I haven't updated it in a while), it took me at least a week to get all the links to work. He only announced Tuesday, and he HAS made his stand on the issues clear, despite the current technical difficulties. Honestly people, if this is the best you can do, that doesn't say much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
37. Ok, I've had just about enought of this
This jeolousy is disgusting. Today, Clark is on top and he's only been in the race for five days. Read about the Newsweek poll. His campaign has collected almost a million and this is not from the 1.9 million already pledged. At this rate, he will have all the money he needs in around six months. I love Dennis Kucinich. If he were not in the bottomm tier, would everybody be attacking him? This is so not cool, people (yes, I know this term is outdated, but it fit). Do you people really want this forum to turn into one huge slugfest? Please, please stop these horrible threads attacking Clark. You really don't want to see me angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
61. Look Clark may be a decent fellow,
nothing I've read about him suggests otherwise. But, the Clark people are always touting his "leadership" - fine, as a general, he obviously has leadership ability. But, if you don't know what his positions and program and policies are, you don't know where it is he wants to lead you. A good leader can only be judged if you know the destination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
topdog08 Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. It's funny because all of the other links work
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 12:38 AM by topdog04
The official site is americansforclark.com not draftwesleyclark.com
They've got photos, books, Clark in his own words. The list goes on.

"On The Issues" is the ONLY thing missing. That's why it's so funny.

Looks like the Draft Clark supporters have done more thinking about Wesley Clark on the issues than Clark's staff has done themselves.

Obviously, it takes time. This is why Clark is simply too late. A title only takes you so far, especially in Iowa or New Hampshire.

And don't expect me to give him a break after he breaks the story that he is gonna run at 10:29, exactly ONE MINUTE before Edwards official announcement speech. All to suck the wind out the Edwards story - sucessfully, despite a crowd of over 2,000 that dwarfed anybody but Dean's. According to CNN, Democratic officials all said "These are Gore folks, they knew exactly what they were doing" by breaking the story at just the right time. You want to play hardball? Don't stand too close to the plate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
40. I thought
Edwards announcement was splendid. My esteem for him just keeps going up, even though I strongly disagree with him on Iraq. I thought the leaking of Clark's decision was tacky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. ha-ha! Points for honesty at least!
-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Is Clark under construction?
COMING SOON

This feature is under construction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. It takes a lot of wood
to build a Trojan Horse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. No- but his platform is...
...and you will get no argument from me on the fact that we do not know his positions on many issues...that's why that link is so funny...

...hey- I could point Clarks's weaknesses, but other DUers are better at that than me-

I think the debates will interesting to say the least!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. If I ever have to do stand up comedy, I hope you're in the audience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Don't quit your day job
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. Come on... This sort of shit is pathetic.
We don't need freepers. We can implode all by our selves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexwcovington Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. More sad than funny
Yeah, this is a low blow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. A low blow to whom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick of Bullshit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. A low blow to General Poseur
and his "Hey, I'm a Democrat" Trojan Horse ploy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
36. My finger is cramped from hitting the "Ignore" t.a.h.'s Button!
Thanks,though. Smoked out some 'more! :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. The down side to having been a general rather than a politician
and another reason to regret that the founding fathers merged the roles of head of government and head of state into the one office of president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
24. What is more important, a few lousy issues
or a Hundred Year Vision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Are you serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Serious as a mule sandwich.
You think a HUNDRED YEAR VISION is funny?
I do not even know what I will have for breakfast tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Or a Thousand Year Reich?
What is more important, a few lousy issues or a Hundred Year Vision?

Or a Thousand Year Reich? Is that Clark's new campaign slogan?

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Good one- Clark is a Nazi too!
I guess that means Clinton was a Nazi!

A classic: the old "Nazi card"!!!

I never tire of the "classics!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. I think Dr. Godwin needs to show up right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. It's a macho thing with General Clark: real men don't DO issues.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. General Clark is an elegant gentleman.
Issues are not elegant and they are not gentlemen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
34. Maybe he will...
have something up there within the next 100 years or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #34
49. LOL!
good one! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
35. Tip your waitresses! Jimmy will be appearing here all week!
SFW,YFAH.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
39. I think he wants to make sure he doesn't end up with
crap like this:

http://www.deanforamerica.com/site/PageServer?pagename=...

Better that his issues be logical and well-thought out than that they be a bunch of soft, fuzzy rhetoric that has no bite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
62. Can't defend Clark's poor planing...
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 02:53 PM by TLM

so attack Dean's excess of information... way to spin having your shit together BEFORE you run, as a bad thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
41. I was predisposed
to take Clark seriously, but he's presented himself as unprepared. He had plenty of time to get his ducks in a row. Remarks like the one he made last week, indicating a lack of familiarity with with the Brady bill and his handling of what his position on the War is/was, confound me. He needs to get up to speed. Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #41
51. I agree
I'm currently a Clark supporter. But if he doesn't get up to speed, I'll have to reconsider. This coming debate is going to be the make or break point for him. I have confidence though, he's smart. I don't know if he'll be politically savvy, he's been clumsy so far, but he's got the most brilliant analytical mind of all the candidates, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disgruntella Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
42. boo fucking hoo
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
44. Projected image
I guess they thought the fact that he was a General was all the voters cared about and the Democratic base would swallow the bait.

It is an insult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemInIdaho Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
46. At least the contribute page works fine
It even starts at $100.00
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
50. he needs that filled out yesterday
even if it's short missives, anything is better than under construction jeez what an amatuer, and to think I went to a Clark meet-up last month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
53. I agree that this is bad.
Even if Clark just made up his mind recently that he was going to run, he has known for some time that he was considering it. He should have had his positions ready to go as soon as he jumped in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
56. ouch, you nailed it good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katie Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Loved Mike Moore's Letter to Clark
Seems he understood Clark's postions better than anyone.

A Citizen's Appeal to a General in a Time of War
(at Home)

September 12, 2003

Dear General Wesley Clark,

I've been meaning to write to you for some time. Two days after the Oscars, when I felt very alone and somewhat frightened by the level of hatred toward me for daring to suggest that we were being led into war for "fictitious reasons," one person stuck his neck out and came to my defense on national television.

And that person was you.

Aaron Brown had just finished interviewing me by satellite on CNN, and I had made a crack about me being "the only non-general allowed on CNN all week." He ended the interview and then turned to you, as you were sitting at the desk with him. He asked you what you thought of this crazy guy, Michael Moore. And, although we were still in Week One of the war, you boldly said that my dissent was necessary and welcome, and you pointed out that I was against Bush and his "policies," not the kids in the service. I sat in Flint with the earpiece still in my ear and I was floored -- a GENERAL standing up for me and, in effect, for all the millions who were opposed to the war but had been bullied into silence.

Since that night, I have spent a lot of time checking you out. And what I've learned about you corresponds to my experience with you back in March. You seem to be a man of integrity. You seem not afraid to speak the truth. I liked your answer when you were asked your position on gun control: "If you are the type of person who likes assault weapons, there is a place for you -- the United States Army. We have them."

In addition to being first in your class at West Point, a four star general from Arkansas, and the former Supreme Commander of NATO -- enough right there that should give pause to any peace-loving person -- I have discovered that...

1. You oppose the Patriot Act and would fight the expansion of its powers.

2. You are firmly pro-choice.

3. You filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of the University of Michigan's affirmative action case.

4. You would get rid of the Bush tax "cut" and make the rich pay their fair share.

5. You respect the views of our allies and want to work with them and with the rest of the international community.

6. And you oppose war. You have said that war should always be the "last resort" and that it is military men such as yourself who are the most for peace because it is YOU and your soldiers who have to do the dying. You find something unsettling about a commander-in-chief who dons a flight suit and pretends to be Top Gun, a stunt that dishonored those who have died in that flight suit in the service of their country


General Clark, last night I finally got to meet you in person. I would like to share with others what I said to you privately: You may be the person who can defeat George W. Bush in next year's election.

This is not an endorsement. For me, it's too early for that. I have liked Howard Dean (in spite of his flawed positions in support of some capital punishment, his grade "A" rating from the NRA, and his opposition to cutting the Pentagon budget). And Dennis Kucinich is so committed to all the right stuff. We need candidates in this race who will say the things that need to be said, to push the pathetically lame Democratic Party into have a backbone -- or get out of the way and let us have a REAL second party on the ballot.

But right now, for the sake and survival of our very country, we need someone who is going to get The Job done, period. And that job, no matter whom I speak to across America -- be they leftie Green or conservative Democrat, and even many disgusted Republicans -- EVERYONE is of one mind as to what that job is:

Bush Must Go.

This is war, General, and it's Bush & Co.'s war on us. It's their war on the middle class, the poor, the environment, their war on women and their war against anyone around the world who doesn't accept total American domination. Yes, it's a war -- and we, the people, need a general to beat back those who have abused our Constitution and our basic sense of decency.

The General vs. the Texas Air National Guard deserter! I want to see that debate, and I know who the winner is going to be.

The other night, when you were on Bill Maher's show, he began by reading to you a quote from Howard Dean where he (Dean) tried to run away from the word "liberal." Maher said to you, so, General, do you want to run away from that word? Without missing a beat, you said "No!" and you reminded everyone that America was founded as a "liberal democracy." The audience went wild with applause.

That is what we have needed for a long time on our side -- guts. I am sure there are things you and I don't see eye to eye on, but now is the time for all good people from the far left to the middle of the road to bury the damn hatchet and get together behind someone who is not only good on the issues but can beat George W. Bush. And where I come from in the Midwest, General, I know you are the kind of candidate that the average American will vote for.

Michael Moore likes a general? I never thought I'd write these words. But desperate times call for desperate measures. I want to know more about you. I want your voice heard. I would like to see you in these debates. Then let the chips fall where they may -- and we'll all have a better idea of what to do. If you sit it out, then I think we all know what we are left with.

I am asking everyone I know to send an email to you now to encourage you to run, even if they aren't sure they would vote for you. (Wesley Clark's email address is: info@leadershipforamerica.org ). None of us truly know how we will vote five months from now or a year from now. But we do know that this race needs a jolt -- and Bush needs to know that there is one person he won't be able to Dukakisize.

Take the plunge, General Clark. At the very least, the nation needs to hear what you know about what was really behind this invasion of Iraq and your fresh ideas of how we can live in a more peaceful world. Yes, your country needs you to perform one more act of brave service -- to help defeat an enemy from within, at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, an address that used to belong to "we, the people."

Yours,

Michael Moore
Lottery # 275, U.S. military draft, 1972
Conscientious Objector applicant
mmflint@aol.com

http://www.draftwesleyclark.com/mmoore_letter.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
58. Went there, but I don't get it.
It looks like it is under construction. Only a Dem-bashing doofus would make something of that, so please tell me. What's your point, Jim? I want to laugh with you, not at you.

Mystified. Guess it's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uptohere Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #58
67. how is it possible that a polititian has no stands on the issues
thats what they have to differentiate themselves.

And I'd suggest correcting that "dem bashing doofus" to "Clark bashing doofus". That is unless you think that there is no differentiating any one from the rest. I'll require my own individuality. I may be part of the herd but that that doesn't mean I cede my self to it totally and mindlessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. That's ridiculous.
There IS LIFE OFFLINE, people!

Just because it's not on his website, doesn't mean he has no stand on the issues. And somehow, I doubt most Americans have even checked his site.

Gee whiz, already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
63. Didn't find anything terribly funny there
Must have missed the point. :shrug: Can't wait too come back here AFTER we have a nominee. If for no other reason than too see who eats crow about how their candidate, who was the "best guy for the job", lost the nomination. Should make for great fun. :bounce: :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
birdman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
64. This looks horrible
I'm beginning to think that the General may not
be ready for prime-time. He sure hasn't looked like a
dynamite candidate thus far.

:eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uptohere Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. to put it mildly
what has the guy been doing that was more importent ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
66. LOL
Perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
69. I dont find it funny at all
I find it frightening.

I hope he gets them up sometime soon. Cause right now it apears he is running for president cause people asked him to not because he actually has any ideas on what he would do.

He apears to be a decent candidate on the surface but untill we get this field filled in no one will know for sure.

I will say that it doesnt really benefit him to put these posistions down any sooner than he has to cause once he does he is locked in no matter what that position is and it can both help and hurt him depending on what his positions turn out to be. As long as he is undefined we can continue to think the best of him with no evidence to the contrary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
70. Hey smarmy Dean supporters- where was YOUR man 10 years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
71. I saw something similar at Dean's site awhile ago.
Awhile ago, I went to Dean's site to find out his stance on civil rights. The civil rights page said something like 'under construction' or something.

Obviously, months later, it is no longer like that.

Big hairy deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
73. I think they are not going to post them until he makes his policy
speeches. Still I think it looks bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
74. I guess it doesn't matter to "real" people
It only matters to people who think that going to a website four days after it is put up amounts to a hill of beans. Check the polls, I'm sure all those people who support Clark said "Yeah but his website isn't finished, so I have second thoughts"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 17th 2014, 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC