Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Must read - Lunch with Wesley Clark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 08:40 AM
Original message
Must read - Lunch with Wesley Clark
Professor Yin of the University of Iowa sat down for lunch with Wesley Clark last week, along with a bunch of other members of the university's law school faculty. Yin sat at Clark's table. They asked Clark a bunch of questions. Yin details Clark's answers on his site:

http://yin.blog-city.com/read/231503.htm

Yin's conclusion---pretty much a home run. Yin concludes that the other Dem candidates would do well not to plan on campaigning past the Dem primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
connor Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Minor correction regarding your conclusion
Having read Professor Yin's report, I think you overstate his conclusions. "Home run" is much too strong, and he did NOT conclude that "the other Dem candidates" should give up soon. What he actually said was:

"Anyway, I hope that as he begins campaigning, Gen. Clark continues to display the forthrightness that he showed today. The way things look now, if I were Dick Gephardt, Dennis Kucinich, Al Sharpton, Carol Mosley Braun, or Joe Lieberman, I wouldn't be making plans to be campaigning past the Democratic primary.

That cuts the field in half, but still leaves Professor Yin's obvious conclusion that Howard Dean, John Kerry, Bob Graham, and John Edwards are all well worth considering (in his opinion) along with Clark.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good point Connor and welcome to DU
:toast::party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
connor Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thanks
Much appreciated. I've been checking DU daily for news and an un-sugarcoated take on same for a long time. More than a year now. Thought I'd finally raise my own voice, unabashedly liberal as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Re: Cutting the Field in Half
I'm of the school that says voters ought to decide whether any candidate (or group of candidates) who want to run should drop out. And one primary or caucus may not decide that.

And I say that because my guy, Dean, was one of the longest of long shots at the beginning of 2003. (Bill Clinton was in a similar position.) I don't dismiss any of the ten candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. They ought to stop campaigning
past WHICH Democratic primary?

And, at some point, candidates WILL start dropping out. Oh, maybe it will take until early March to know for sure who the nominee is going to be, but I rather expect that the losing candidates will, after a period of time to recover from not being the nominee, will come out and campaign for the nominee.

Actually, wouldn't it be GREAT if not matter who the nominee is, all the candidates stand behind him (sorry, Ms Mosely Braun, but it won't be you this time) and campaign vigorously? Think about it, imagine your favorite candidate campaigning for one of the other guys. I know that would make me support the nominee enthusiastically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I accept this minor correction if I may add...
Another of Professor Yin's opinions of Clark, directly quoted:

"He impressed many of my colleagues and me. Of course, considering that many (most?) of my colleagues are Democrats, perhaps that's not unexpected. But I have to say that given the breadth of questions he was getting, he showed remarkable command of factual matters and political issues. What I was most impressed with was his willingness to accept reality and to state clear opinions. The Social Security question was probably the best indication of this. You might disagree with raising the cap on the amount of income subject to the payroll tax, but the reality is that there are only four things that can be done: (1) raise the retirement age; (2) cut benefits; (3) raise the payroll tax (either the rate or the amount of income taxed); or (4) some combination of two or all three. Some people might think it is better to cut benefits, say, to the wealthy elderly by means-testing. Some might think we should all suffer a little and cut benefits across the board. But I give Gen. Clark immense credit for being, as far as I can tell, the first of the major candidates to select from that unpalatable menu."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. For the Record...
Edited on Sun Sep-21-03 11:57 AM by tsipple
Howard Dean has publicly stated, long ago, he favors eliminating the earnings cap on the payroll tax.

On edit: eliminating instead of lifting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Hi connor!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disgruntella Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for the link - this was amusing
"* He likes the French. In fact, just before he stepped down as the NATO Supreme Commander, a French political leader told him, "You should have been French!" Coming from the French, that sounds like high praise. He did note that the French suffer from a similar problem to what he believes the current administration suffers from, namely, too narrow of a view of self-interest."

I wonder how long it will be before the right-wing talking heads make themselves look like asses talking this up...

Anyway, thanks for the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, They'll Have a "Frenchman" Trail Clark
Somebody dressed up in some "French looking" getup, with beret, trailing Clark at every campaign stop as a French lover.

Or something like that. I hope we're ready for some of the most incredible election crap ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disgruntella Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. oh god! that put the most ridiculous image in my head
Some pathetically sterotypical "Frenchie" wearing a beret and a striped shirt with a baguette under his arm, twirling his moustache, shouting out "Vive La France!" at every Clark appearance.

:crazy:

I stopped drinking a couple years ago; maybe I ought to start again to keep images like that from popping up in my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Chef Boyardee
Hector Boyardi was Italian, as it happens, but the GOP would do something like that, I have no doubt. Whatever they can get away with, and more. Willie Horton, cruises in Boston Harbor, you name it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC