Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Christian religion is against medical treatment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:08 PM
Original message
What Christian religion is against medical treatment?
They're in the news occasionally for refusing to let their children be treated for something that is fatal if not treated.

Imagine if they were politically powerful and tried to establish this agenda: Medical treatment is abolished because it shows we don't trust God to cure us.

Stem-cell research is a taste of it.

In the middle ages, scientists had to sneak around the "Christians" and dig up graves to learn human anatomy.

Of course, the other side is that we do force this group's children to have treatment sometimes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jehovah's Witnesses
won't allow blood transfusions...I almost had a patient die after surgery because she refused. Not sure if they're the same group you're speaking of though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. They cause quite a dilema when someone causes their injuries and they die
because they refuse blood transfusions. Some cases have gone to higher courts.

Witnesses actually cite verses that say they shouldn't partake of blood and they interpret this to include blood transfusions.

I'm not defending or condemning them here, but it would be interesting to point this out to the political fundies who get on their high horses about following the book when there are obviously things they miss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ironically...
Edited on Wed May-25-05 03:12 PM by bicentennial_baby
it's the Christian Scientists who do this.

Christian Science, a homegrown American religious and medical sect, was founded by Mary Baker. She suffered from a variety of ailments--lung, liver and stomach problems, backaches, colds, fevers, "nervousness," and "depression"--and had tried a variety of remedies, including dietary cures and homeopathy, when in 1862, she traveled to Portland, Maine, to receive treatment from Phineas Parkhurst Quimby, a healer. After Quimby effected a cure through his system of massage, encouragement, and "mental healing," she became his student and associate.

Shortly after Quimby's death in 1866, she slipped and fell on an icy street. Confined to bed and given little chance of recovery, she began reading the Bible. After a period of solitary meditation, she was overwhelmed by the idea that her life was in God and that God was the only life. From this revelation followed her healing; she got out of bed, dressed, and walked out of her sickroom, to the amazement of those in attendance.

In 1875, Mary Baker published Science and Health (in later editions, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures), the founding text of Christian Science. In it, she asserted that "all is mind and there is no matter," death and sickness are only illusions, and that everything emanates from God and is perfect--healing comes from the true understanding of these doctrines.

Two years later she married Asa Gilbert Eddy, one of her students. In 1879, the Church of Christ, Scientist, was founded and in 1881 ordained Mrs. Eddy its minister. After some dissension within the ranks, the original church dissolved and in 1892, Mrs. Eddy founded the First Church of Christ, Scientist, of Boston, also called "the Mother Church."

Practically from its inception, Christian Science was embroiled in controversy in the form of disputes over Eddy's authority, and lawsuits challenging the claims and efficacy of Christian Science healing practice and the originality of Eddy's doctrine. Competition from rival mental healing sects (called "New Thought")--some of which derived their theories from Eddy's own texts--led to further contention. Despite these difficulties, Christian Science and related doctrines spread widely in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, forming an alternative, especially popular among women, to both established religion and orthodox medicine.

See also Eddy, Mary Baker; Religion.
http://www.answers.com/topic/church-of-christ-scientist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Medicine, in those days...
was so rudimentary that prayer was thought to have outcomes nearly as good. BTW, surgeons were not considered on a par with medical doctors around that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Momgonepostal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Christian scientists, I believe...
oppose certain type of treatments.

Someone here will probably know more details than I do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boomboom Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes
Christian Science believes in spiritual healing. No medicine, doctors, hospitals etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Both
I had a roommate in college who was a Christian Scientist. Really bizarre. Whenever she got a cold she thought she had sinned. So she felt crappy and guilty at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Christian Scientists n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, Christain Scientists. Thanks. Bush needs some of that CS guilt.
Don't ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Methodists
George Bush is a Methodist, and he is definately against medical treatment ....for middleclass and poorer Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. LOL! "medical care for middle class and poor Americans"
How true!

Although, I don't think it's the Methodist beliefs he supposedly holds, but his born again ideologue that provides his "blame the poor" attitudes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC