Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Growing Case For Screening Newborns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:04 PM
Original message
The Growing Case For Screening Newborns
The Growing Case For Screening Newborns

Fatal Disorder Can Be Treated With Cord-Blood Transplant If Caught at Birth, Study Says

By DAVID ARMSTRONG
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
May 19, 2005; Page D1

A new study gives added weight to the growing movement to test newborn babies for an array of rare but life-threatening genetic disorders. In the study, researchers from Duke University and the University of North Carolina found that a transplant of donor umbilical-cord blood soon after birth can save babies with Krabbe disease, an often-fatal enzyme illness. Of 25 babies treated, 18 were saved by the procedure.

No states test newborns for Krabbe or most of the other 44 enzyme conditions in a class known as lysosomal-storage disorders -- in part because the cases have long been considered hopeless. Babies born with Krabbe disease, which can impair development and cause seizures, usually die before reaching two years of age if untreated. The study, published in this week's New England Journal of Medicine, is the latest evidence that at least some lysosomal diseases can be treated successfully, especially if caught at birth.

The research gives a significant boost to efforts by patient-advocacy groups and many physicians to create a universal standard for newborn screenings that would apply to all states and include far more diseases than most states now test for. Currently, requirements vary widely from state to state, with some testing for as few as three conditions and others screening for as many as 43, ranging from hypothyroidism to sickle-cell disease. As a result, advocates for universal screening say the fate of babies with genetic problems can depend simply on where they were born.

(snip)

Write to David Armstrong at [email protected]

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB111645701027237452,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. This would be great to do if available
Often genetic problems are not caught until the baby/child has been damaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC