|
Some human beings operate from a whole other level of understanding than the rest of us. In my physical life I've crossed paths for a few minuites with two such beings but did not speak to either one of them. In both instances they transmitted a lesson to me directly through their very being in the world--without words.
That said, I spent a great deal of time as a child studying the New Testament. As a previous story indicated, I was aware from an early age that powerful forces were acting in my life. (They still are.) The Christian teaching as it came to me played a very profound role in my spiritual development and I took certain things ascribed to Jesus very seriously. I still do. Inwardly, however, I found myself in conflict with the Christian teaching as it was presented to me. For one thing I began to experience my homosexual feelings as an adolescent and I had to struggle with this conflict. One way I struggled with it was to look beyond the limitations of Christianity as it is ordinarily understood. In high school, for example, I was already reading books on Zen Buddhism by D. T. Suzuki and feeling that I could follow them. By the age of 19 I was already experimenting with some very potent and pure psychedelics. At 20 I found God--and, yes, I was very high on LSD at the time but that doesn't matter. God and I met in eternity where we have always met, are still meeting and will forever meet. Meanwhile, back on planet Earth, life goes on. I cried and cried and cried--everyone thought I must have gone nuts.
It took a while for it to begin to become clear to me that taking psychedelics and spiritual awakening were two very different things that only occasionally overlapped in any meaningful way. I moved to California, the San Francisco Bay Area, in 1973 and although a lot had changed since the height of the Sixties, there was still much here at the time that was truly unique in my experience. Crisscrossing paths with everything from Moonies to Harikrishnas to 'One World Family Commune' to ESTies to Dyanetics to Delancy Street to the Simbionese Liberation Army to People's Temple to a wide variety of Eastern traditions from Buddhism to Hinduism to Zorasterism to the Humanistic and Transpersonal Psychology movements--I truly could go on and on. It was all right here and much of it still is.
Somehow amidst this stew I found the words of two very different teachers to be of extraordinary help. Psychedelics had taught me that our social reality is a construct and, as such, there is the theoretical possibility of reconstructing it in a form that is more conducive to those human values embedded in the Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Human beings, it still seems to me despite all evidence to the contrary, really OUGHT to be able to achieve this simple aim of peaceful coexistence IF they wanted to and IF they were allowed to by others who would not profit from any such peaceful coexistence. Krishnamurti helped me begin to understand that what separates us from ourselves--our innermost selves--and one another is certain habits and attitudes manifesting as 'thoughts' within the mind. We do not come to this moment fresh and new like an innocent child. We have stored within us not only the memory of our personal experiences but the storehouse of memory we were given to learn from our respective cultures. In those days the great human divide on a global scale was between the United States and all that it represented (or pretended to represent) on the one hand, versus the USSR and all that were told it represented on the other. Krishnamurti's point is that it is our own fear and the thoughts in our head which separate us; NOT something more fundamental. That is to say, if we turn our attention inward and look directly at how our own sense of identity is manufactured, we will see that it is manufactured in precisely the same way by most everyone else. Doesn't matter whether one is a Hindu or a Buddhist or a Jane or a Moslem or a Jew or a Christian; a Capitalist or a Communist or a Socialist or a German or an Italian or a this or a that. Krishnamurti saw that there is a living, moving fundamental ground of being from which all of us arise like waves on an ocean. He maintained that if our attentions could move beyond the distraction of memory, thought and difference, we could touch something in ourselves that is universally human--and more than that, Universal in a far greater sense. Although Krishnamurti was wary of words and never named it, I think I can safely say he was pointing toward both Being and Consciousness--and possibly other attributes as well.
Krisnamurti--who is by no means 'easy'--is a piece of cake compared to the ideas of G. I. Gurdjieff. Where Krishnamurti was ademant that "Truth is a pathless land," Gurdjieff argued that man as he is can only know a completely subjective 'truth'; that to know an Objective Truth required a man who could be objective in relation to himself. From the Gurdjieffian perspective, Krishnamurti represents a "stupid saint;" that is, someone who has achieved a new level of being awareness but who, ultimately, does not know HOW he did so. He is not wrong to say that Truth is a pathless land (in other words, you can not follow anyone else to it) only, Gurdjieff insists, humanity as it is can never find this 'land'. Not only do we not know where to look, most of us asume we can know the truth as we are, already do know the truth for the most part or can, in any case, recognize the truth if and when we see it. Gurdjieff insists this is quite wrong--and we haven't any idea how wrong it is. At the same time, Gurdjieff insists that one must not simply accept this because he says it. His teaching is a methodology for observing one's self and direct learning as a result of this observation. It is also the exposition of a system that represents the potential for a radical paradigm shift among those who are capable of recognizing what this actually means and what is necessary to sacrifice in order to bring it about.
|