Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there any medical procedure that MEN are not allowed by law to

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:37 PM
Original message
Is there any medical procedure that MEN are not allowed by law to
have done to their bodies? I am especially interested in any procedure that involves their reproductive organs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Last I heard
Vasectomies were perfectly legal.

And I've yet to hear of a movement to ban them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seriously, I was wondering why we as females cannot cry discrimination
over not being allowed control of our bodies simply because we are females and have females reproductive organs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. because we are second class citizens!!
put up or shut up is their motto!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. But we are more than half of the population. Why don't we have more
power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. because weak, insecure men keep us down.
it's primal. it goes back a zillion years.

conscious men see our power. unconscious ones don't.

it sucks, doesn't it?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. It sure does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. When Mr. CornField had his vasectomy
the doctor's office required that I sign a consent form. I flatly refused and told them he was a grown up and could decide for himself what he wanted to do with his body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Such silliness. Why are we so hung up on the ability to reproduce?
It's not like there aren't enough (as in way too many) people in this world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I remember hearing you could implant an embryo in a man's testicles
and that it was illegal to do so.

Something I vaguely remember reading in Omni Magazine circa 1980.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Now that is a new one on me.
I am flabbergasted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Not sure if this is legit: The Science of Male Pregnancy
In the years since the first "test tube baby" was born in 1978, physicians and scientists from RYT Hospital have been working to develop a viable technique for the successful impregnation of male individuals. Illustrated to the right is a recent radiographic image of Mr. Lee, the first human subject to attempt this procedure, which shows the healthy fetus developing in his abdominal cavity.

Please note that RYT Hospital is not accepting new patients for this procedure. Male pregnancy is still in its experimental stage and will not be available to the public in the immediate future.

In vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques were used to induce an ectopic pregnancy by implanting an embryo and placenta into the abdominal cavity, just under the peritoneum (the surrounding lining). Please read below for the step-by-step process.

1. HORMONES
Oral doses of female hormones were administered to Mr. Lee to make him receptive to the pregnancy. The following graphs of his hormone treatment were prepared by Simone M. Lowell, M.D., Ph.D., Attending Physician and Associate Professor of Biochemistry and Reproductive Medicine at RYT Hospital-Dwayne Medical Center. Dr. Lowell's research is one of the primary reasons that this clinical procedure is now possible.


More:
http://www.malepregnancy.com/science/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. But this does not seem to be illegal. Weird, but not illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. You know this is a hoax site, right?
"The RYT Hospital-Dwayne Medical Center has been on the forefront of recent medical advances. They've developed a transgenic mouse with the cognitive abilities of a human. They've helped a man give birth. They've even developed nano-robots to deliver gene therapies and repair tissue. Pretty amazing stuff. And they've got a very slick website. Too bad none of it is real."


http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/ryt_hospital/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Nope, I did not know it. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Sorry, I jus realized how snotty that sounded.
Left to my own devices I'd believe in everything from the Shroud of Turin to Ramtha. I've gotten into the habit of "Snoping" everything, and the Museum of Hoaxes is one of my resources. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. I just believe that many men are so jealous of women and their ability
to have babies, that they are driven by a desire to take that over from us also. Therefore, it was not far for me to jump from that thought to that site. Feel like a goose now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
54. I hope they do research this ; it will solve the abortion debate
Edited on Fri Apr-29-05 06:08 AM by Nobody
If a woman doesn't want to be pregnant, the anti-choice crowd can have the embryo tranferred to them instead. Maybe we might even have a lottery to determine who gets the procedure. Bet you these guys will be backtracking at 200 mph.

I say we start with Randall Terry. No, he doesn't get to choose. I do. And I've chosen him to be the first.

on edit: fixed subject line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. That would be spectacular. Every unwanted fetus goes into a nonchoice
males' womb/sac. This is a fab idea. Of course, they would argue that this is not God's way and it is totally unnatural. LOVE IT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Yes, I read that too. Don't think it was the testicles though...
Edited on Thu Apr-28-05 07:01 PM by Solly Mack
At least I don't recall it being that, I could be wrong.

IIRC, it said the fetus just needed to latch on to an organ in the abdominal region to draw nutrients. Naturally ending with a C-section to be humane.

I thought it a wonderful idea!

The male seahorse is much to be admired.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. I remember reading about the duodenum or scrotal sack as options
I'm pretty certain about the scrotal sack option-- it evoked very visceral images.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #40
53. You're probably right
A man wouldn't forget such a suggestion. Well, they wouldn't... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Just had a thought. Say our reproductive rights are taken away and a
male is able through artifical means to have a baby and something happens to the fetus and he wants to abort. Will he have to carry the baby to term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. "If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament." Florynce -
Edited on Thu Apr-28-05 08:46 PM by Solly Mack
Kennedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I have seen that quote before but do not know who that person is who
said it. Do you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Yes. Flo's dead now but she was a great lady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. OMG. I call myself a feminist. How DID I miss this wonderful person?
(Wrote lady and then changed it, but a lady in the TRUE sense of the word.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Here's a link you will enjoy!
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/122300-01.htm

"are you my alternative?" (I love that line)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. "Sweetie, if you are not living on the edge, you are taking up space."
Well, that would apply to most of folks around us now. What a wonderful person she was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. catholics need to go after the vasectomy
after all it is denying the sperm the right to the egg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Are they really okay with the church?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. i wouldn't imagine, but if they publicly go after birth control
pills, they should publicly go after vasectomies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The Church is opposed
to all forms of birth control. Sex is for procreation.

Now, I haven't heard them object to old people getting married, but to follow their reasoning to its logic conclusion, that shoudl be forbidden since there would be not chance of procreation occurring.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Is there any other reason to have a vasectomy? Any other health
Edited on Thu Apr-28-05 07:21 PM by efhmc
reason or is like tying ones tubes, for reproduction prevention only?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. If I recall correctly, vasectomies are verboten by the Catholic church
When I had mine (1979, after son #2 was born) I had already lapsed and didn't care. But I seem to recall my mother 'helpfully' pointing that fact out to me. But I'm not sure its a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeeinlouisiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
52. Yes, the Catholic church does not like vasectomies.
I used to work for an insurance company and we had waivers that were part of the contract. The waiver stated a Catholic hospital did not have to perform any type of sterilization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Might be castration
Edited on Thu Apr-28-05 06:52 PM by Malva Zebrina
the horror of all men, scared to death that they cannot impregnate as many women as possible, as is their genetic/hormonal impulse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. So if one chooses one could not do this procedure? I seem to recall
a sex offender asking for and having this done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. You are correct. People voluntarily have surgical castration.
In fact, we used to force castration of the mentally retarded, right here in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. So it not illegal if voluntary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Men are allowed
to have sex change operations, which involves lopping off the beans and franks.

Not illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. There have been cases of sexual predators
who begged the state for castration, and the government would not permit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. I read sometime ago that if you want to be neutered, like
having your testicles removed, you can't and would have to have it done in a foreign country. However, how this affects sex change operations, which I think are legal, I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. What would be the difference ? If one does a sex change from male to
female, it would all go, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. That was my point.
I don't know much about it, but I think they put the testicles inside kind of like fake ovaries or something like that, but they are sliced and changed into something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yep, I think they do this or whatever they want to their reproductive
organs. Again, why isn't it then discrimination to tell women what they can do with their reproductive organs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Of course it is.
No one has any right over a woman's body without her permission and against her wishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Well, of course, I knew you would know the right answer to this. I am
just wondering why this cannot be argued legally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doc Bottom Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. No...
In a male-to-female "gender reassignment" surgery, the testicles go down to the incinerator in the hospital basement.

It's the penis that gets sliced and turned inside out.

Anyway, yeah, this is legal, and it is castration. Not just anybody can go and get this done in the US, though -- surgeons who do it like to be very sure that they only do it to 'real transexuals' and so you must have a psycho, the rapist reassure the surgeon that you are a real transexual, and do this thing where you live in the desired gender-role for a year or so before the surgery, to see that you can manage it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Thanks for weighing in. I wasn't sure.
Basically, just how much interference do males have to tolerate in regard their reproductive choices and organs? I don't think as much as women do, but if they do then I think it's wrong too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doc Bottom Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Transgendered people
Regardless of their genetically-determined sex, never really qualify as "men" with the privledges thereof. So they're probably irrelevant to the discussion.

One might say that men have to tolerate a great deal of interference in their reproductive choices and organs. Just not from the state -- women can very easily use birth control without the male's knowledge or consent. I don't think anybody really ought to take an issue with that, but in such a case, his reproductive choices are none. But then again, under many circumstances either partner is perfectly capable of thwarting his or her lover's wishes concerning contraception.

Male babies are subjected to genital mutilation as a matter of course. Admittedly, most adult men prefer being circumsized to the horror of dick cheese, but so much for non-interference with your sexual organs.

I don't think these things are really comperable to abortion-rights issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Totally off topic, but...
What is "the horror of dick cheese"?

Have you stopped laughing yet? LOL! I have a cut husband and an uncut son. Just wondering if "dick cheese" was something I need to be on the lookout for during bath time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Two uncut gsons and have no idea what you are talking about.
However, I understand that more and more insurance companies will not be paying for that "procedure" because it is not necessary. {Plus it hurts those little guys unnecessarily, I am sure.}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doc Bottom Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. The horror
"Dick cheese" is the nasty crud that can build up under the foreskin if a man doesn't pull it back and wash under it.

It's one of those "your milage may vary" things. Just like some people don't get smelly even if they don't shower for days, and others are pretty rank after less than twelve hours. Some guys don't get dick cheese, some guys get it so fast they'd best be nipping off with a washcloth before enjoying a lunchtime BJ, if they've any courtesy at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. Way too much info. Could have done without knowing this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #38
55. The key word here is "bath."
If a male is taught to bring soap in close proximity to his body often enough, "dick cheese," which is technically called "smegma" should not be a problem. After witnessing a circumcision years ago, uncut gets my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Daily soaking in the tub with soap does seem to be a great solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. Made the choice not to cut the little gbabies. We left it up to the poppy
and after viewing an internet video, he said no way. As to birth control, when a guy has the possibility of being pg after many or most sexual encounters we will talk equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC