Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Repugs changing language again - "nuclear option"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 03:07 PM
Original message
Senate Repugs changing language again - "nuclear option"
They're doing it again!

Senate Repubs have discovered that the term "nuclear option" does not poll well for them so they have devised a campaign to demonize the verbage - they are now trying to turn it into a "Dem" slanderous term.


From Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo -

Republican press operatives were fanning out to editorial rooms around Washington and New York, attempting to ban the phrase 'nuclear option' from print and airwave, unless it is duly noted as a Democrat-created smear phrase.

As we went on to explain, this is pure crap. Republicans call it the "nuclear option" all the time. Or at least they did until a couple days ago when some as yet undocumented focus group showed it didn't poll well.

more...
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_04_17.php#005497


And there's more:


If you're conversant with the Republican national political debate taxonomy, you know that there is a point at roughly 15 to 16 days after the GOP starts losing a debate that crack teams of specially trained GOP spinmeisters are sent out to bamboozle gullible newspaper editors and TV producers into changing their vocabulary to make it conform to the latest findings of GOP focus groups.

<snip>

what's happened now is that Republicans are getting bad results in the polls. So they've come up with a new smiley-face vocabulary and they're hitting all the newsrooms telling editors that it's an example of bias to use the phrase 'nuclear option' since that's a slur devised by Democrats.

<snip>

... everyone who's listened to this debate for more than ten seconds knows that most Republicans used this phrase as their preferred one until about ten days ago,

<snip>

if Republicans want to start referring to it as the 'judicial act of love' they can do that. But one side in a debate shouldn't be able to order the refs in the game to rewrite the lexicon just because people don't like what's happening. And yet that's just what's happening. Republicans are now making a concerted push at a whole slew of news organizations, trying to convince them to stop using the term in their coverage, on the argument that it's an attack phrase concocted by the Democrats.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_04_17.php#005496




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can we call it "silencing free speech"
Edited on Sat Apr-23-05 03:10 PM by dmordue
The republicans are trying to prevent elected representatives from speaking for their constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. you expect anything less from these people
they're trying to hold on to power for dear life

next thing you know they'll be changing the "death penalty" to "putting them to sleep"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. CNN Headline news just used it...
"...it will be up to Majority leader Frist to decide whether to go Nuclear or not."

Discussing Cheney getting involved and advocatiing the change..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fucking LIARS. Dems DID NOT coin the phrase, "Nuclear Option!"
Edited on Sat Apr-23-05 03:31 PM by in_cog_ni_to
The term “nuclear option” is used because it would almost literally blow up the Senate. It represents an unprecedented grab for complete control by the majority in an institution where all views should be heard and respected. In fact, it was Trent Lott who coined the phrase, when he told a reporter he had a strategy in mind that would allow nominees to be confirmed without broad support, and warned that it would be “nuclear.” (Washington Times, 3/19/03)

http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/takeaction/nuclear/learn_more.cfm

Should we bombard the newsrooms with the TRUTH?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think they're too late on this one
Nuclear Option has stuck, even the Freepers use it.

When discussing the filibuster on the floor of the Senate, many of them say "Nuclear or the Constitutional Option".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Their overall fondness for nukes and going nuke-YOU-lar - (hey!
Edited on Sat Apr-23-05 03:42 PM by jean
That's probably why bush mispronounces the word - it's Freudian - he's thinking "I'm gonna nuke YOU" when trying to say nuclear.)

Anyway - their fondness for destruction of the enemy is blowing back in their beady eyes. You can squint but you can't change your own frame, Senator Frist.

Sen. Bill Frist, MD, VD, (and now) NYDD

(VD - Video Diagnostician. NYDD - Nuke You Damn Dems)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can we call it the slash and burn option? The chainsaw massacre option?
Are those Repubs never satisfied? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. lol . . . .The Armageddon Option!. . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. I sure hope someone publishes THAT memo!
I think the horse has left the barn on 'nuclear option' for them..But if they're trying to rein it in now, I would sure LOVE a link

(oh, and nominated)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC