Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oversight Hearing on Competition in Telecom Marketplace (Act of 1996)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 12:47 AM
Original message
Oversight Hearing on Competition in Telecom Marketplace (Act of 1996)
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=46054

April 20, at 2pm EST

The House Judiciary Committee and the antitrust laws have played a critical role in fostering competition in the telecom industry. After the historic breakup of Ma Bell based on antitrust grounds, Congress passed the Telecom Act of 1996 to help bring local competition to the telecom sector. The Act contained several market-opening provisions such as Section 271 designed to provide competitive opportunities for nonincumbent (non-Baby Bells) carriers that lacked access to the physical infrastructure built by decades of government-created monopoly control of the local exchange. Congress included a specific provision in the 1996 Act to preserve the application of the antitrust laws in the telecom marketplace because it recognized the integral role antitrust laws play in promoting competition, innovation, and consumer choice.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, a wave of consolidation has dramatically recast the competitive landscape in the telecom industry, undermining the pro-competitive goals of the 1996 Act. This consolidation has created what some perceive to be a telecom oligopoly comprised of a diminishing number of Baby Bells that increasingly resemble the Ma Bell monopoly from which they were created.

QUESTIONS: Is revision of the Telecom Act necessary to advance telecom competition? If consummated, would a new round of telecom mergers benefit consumers? What steps can Congress and the Judiciary Committee take to ensure the vitality of competition in the telecom industry?

WITNESSES: Carl Grivner, CEO of XO Communications; Brian Moir on behalf of eTUG; Michael Kellogg on behalf of the U.S. Telecom Association; and Philip Verveer, Former lead Justice Dept. Antitrust Counsel in original DOJ filing that led to AT&T breakup.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here's an interesting fact for you. It only costs $0.008 (the decimals are
correct) to deliver one minute of long distance service anywhere in the contiguous United States. All the infrastructure and equipment was bought and paid for decades ago.

Granted, newer technologies are being incorporated into the network, but the bottom line is it costs your friendly phone company .8 cents per minute for long distance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC