I have a question for you all

[Catholic Sensation]

I had nothing better to do at work today, and so I listened to Sean Hannity's program, and low and behold some "liberal" called in and asked if Sean had served in the military, and when he said no, the guy for some reason said that how can he question Wesley Clark. What is it with some "liberals" and playing the stupid chickenhawk card when it's ridiculously stupid to? If Hannity were criticizing someone for NOT joining the military it would be appropriate, but if he's simply questioning someone's opinions on Iraq, why the fuck do some believe they'll make him look "stupid" for not serving in the military? I don't care for Sean Hannity, but it pisses me off when the most stupid amongst us go on his show and make us look like retards when they say something so flamboyantly stupid.

Speaking of Hannity, I came up with a new name for him today. "Lie-berace", since he's as flamboyant about his dishonesty as Liberace was flamboyant about his sexuality.

[sandnsea]

1. That's why they get through

I'm guessing.

The one's that annoy me are the actual guests who are making so much sense and I'm - yeah yeah yeah - and then they fly off into outerspace somewhere. People sometimes can't differentiate between making points based on evidence and expressing doubts based on lack of evidence. Clinton said it today, we use evidence. Say whatever you want to Republicans, as long as there's solid evidence to back it up.

[Paschall]

2. Liberace wasn't flamboyant about his sexuality

Maybe you're confusing his orientation with his tailor and his decorator.

What is it with these "liberals" who play the queer card?

[Devils Advocate NZ]

3. Uh huh...

Yes "we" liberals always look like "retards" when we question morons like Hannity telling us they know more about war than people who have actually fought one.

Especially to freepers.

[Cocoa]

4. some of those calls are fake

I wouldn't take anything on any of those shows too seriously. It's not real.