|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:25 AM Original message |
| Judge picked for Shiavo case |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. I hope that Judge... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Danmel
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. I hope they're gonna give him bodyguards |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. The Today show said he was "appointed by Clinton" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mr_Spock
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 10. That's OK 'cause "Bush" is often not considered a president anyway |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AzDar
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. Ah! there's the rub...When this man does his job, and tosses this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bunkerbuster1
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:39 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. the CLENIS made 'em remove the tube! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Carni
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:55 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 20. Yep! You got it! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:59 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 22. As I have said before I don't think the fundies will settle for that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Carni
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:03 AM Response to Reply #22 |
| 25. You may be right! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:06 AM Response to Reply #25 |
| 26. Oh I forgot about "Holy Week" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:12 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 33. Deleted message |
| ultraist
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:42 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 40. "Terri survived her passion weekend." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bunkerbuster1
|
Mon Mar-21-05 11:22 AM Response to Reply #40 |
| 55. Well, we knew after "Christmas Under Siege," these evil ratf*ckers |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ultraist
|
Mon Mar-21-05 11:26 AM Response to Reply #55 |
| 56. Our gov has become a full blown Theocracy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. Yep |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Freddie Stubbs
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:31 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 37. Yet the judge was confirmed by a Republican Senate |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mohinoaklawnillinois
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. Can I ask a question? Why was this judge in the federal courthouse |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GiovanniC
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 15. They're Open 24 by 7... Like a 7-11 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 16. The Freakers are already primed to blame the Magical Wonder Clenis |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GiovanniC
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:41 AM Response to Reply #16 |
| 17. "Did the Congressional Bill order the Judge to have it re-inserted?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:49 AM Response to Reply #16 |
| 19. Ohh new catchphrase "Deathocrat" -2 references in first 50 posts |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| in_cog_ni_to
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. This was "by design" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:57 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. A Republican Senate confirmed him |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio_liberal
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
| 11. Looks like it's going to.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Toots
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. How is a judge selected, isn't it random? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:22 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 13. It's random |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| deadparrot
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:44 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 43. I can only pray. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| w4rma
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:24 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 14. Yes. Lottery. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
| 18. Hearing set for 3PM |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:01 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 23. I would expect an injunction |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:03 AM Response to Reply #23 |
| 24. First thing he has to consider is the constitutionality of the legislation |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio_liberal
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:07 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 27. OK, so if the federal district judge |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:09 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 29. The case will be appealed to the Atlanta 11th Circuit Court of Appeals |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:11 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 31. If they do that would be a huge precident to set, no? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:13 AM Response to Reply #31 |
| 34. Yep, if the courts allow this to stand it becomes precedent for every |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio_liberal
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:15 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 36. ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:10 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 30. Court of appeals? The US SC already said No-right? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:11 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 32. That was last week before this legislation passed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:09 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 28. Okay-not a lawyer here but..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AP
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. Clinton nominated a lot of former public defenders to the bench. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Heidi
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 35. This sounds like a good sign to me: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mz Pip
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. Could this judge |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:33 AM Response to Reply #38 |
| 39. Yes, but such a ruling on merit that quickly would be unlikely |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mz Pip
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:43 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 42. This worries me on many levels |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:45 AM Response to Reply #42 |
| 45. But that's the whole point of this! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mz Pip
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:49 AM Response to Reply #45 |
| 47. So who is going to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:52 AM Response to Reply #47 |
| 48. That's where Bush's Texas law becomes the model |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mz Pip
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:58 AM Response to Reply #48 |
| 52. Terri has no money |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 11:10 AM Response to Reply #52 |
| 54. What she has is better than money to the Repukes |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BronxBoy
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:00 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 61. Walt.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Grins
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
| 41. Stetson U. Law School grad - here's your answer! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ultraist
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:44 AM Response to Reply #41 |
| 44. I think Stetson is a lower tiered law school too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RuleofLaw
|
Mon Mar-21-05 11:47 AM Response to Reply #44 |
| 59. Stetson Lawschool |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio_liberal
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:49 AM Response to Reply #41 |
| 46. Oh my |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:52 AM Response to Reply #46 |
| 49. Don't be, Judge George W. Greer who was the last presiding judge |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio_liberal
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:54 AM Response to Reply #49 |
| 50. Just a couple of days ago? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio_liberal
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:55 AM Response to Reply #50 |
| 51. The only thing that makes me smile |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nickfaldo7
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:58 AM Response to Reply #51 |
| 53. culture of life |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ultraist
|
Mon Mar-21-05 11:36 AM Response to Reply #53 |
| 57. "culture of life" applies only to white "Christians" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| janx
|
Mon Mar-21-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 62. My brother graduated from Stetson... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Mar-21-05 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 58. **Heads up! Watch for a data dump today*** |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RuleofLaw
|
Mon Mar-21-05 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 60. Hearing set for today at 3:00 pm |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 21st 2013, 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC