Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean: We need to change the debate on abortion....do it on our terms.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:42 AM
Original message
Dean: We need to change the debate on abortion....do it on our terms.
http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/031005/dean.html

SNIP..."Dean spoke at the House Democrats’ weekly meeting for 15 minutes and took questions from lawmakers, according to several sources inside the well-attended closed-door gathering...."

The last paragraph caught my interest, and I think I like this idea. He has been saying we should not use their terms, trying to show the way they have misused it. He did this with liberal, finally determining the Republicans had damaged the word too much to fix it.

SNIP..."On abortion, Dean told the caucus that the party needs to change the language of the debate, which he said is now conducted on Republican terms. The language, he said, needs to be changed from “pro-life, pro-choice,” to “rare, safe and legal.” And he promised to discuss those changes with groups favoring abortion rights..."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I could not agree more
We should make it clear that one should ever be happy about an abortion, but that sometimes it is the only humane thing to do and the woman should have that legal option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Holy effing crap! You're saying that now we should tell women...
how they should FEEL about any medical procedures they might have? A gal who's had a few unplanned, terminated pregnancies & felt nothing but extreme relief, afterwards, should be ostracized, no BRAINWASHED, into feeling sorrow for doing something that was strictly her business? Jesus, I can see the mental health racket now, treatment for feelings of extreme inhumanity...gee, think we could get disability for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vpigrad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. I still think the real issue needs to be discussed instead!
For "conservatives," the abortion issue has nothing to do with babies. It has to do with control of women. We should use language like "force a woman to be enslaved to another person for 18 years" or "force a woman to gain dozens of pounds and spend many thousands of dollars." I've noticed that while teaching when you present the facts of the repuke's hatred towards young women, almost all of them will come around to the right side. For the boys, too many of them love the idea of controlling women so they don't support freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Tripe
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Doing so will also bring to light the hypocrisy of the anti-woman crowd
Edited on Thu Mar-10-05 11:54 AM by CornField
It is time that the general public was made aware of the ties between the economy and abortion rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Pro BIRTH, not Pro life
They just want them to be born. Don't give a damn what happens to them once they are. Witness this administration's policies to the ALREADY BORN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You're very cute... however the jury is still out on possible intellegence
Abortion rates in the US dropped dramatically during the Clinton years. You do remember those years when the economy was good, right?

As the economy began to slip under the Bush* administration, abortion rates raised significantly.

A close look at the statistical data shows that there is a close tie between women's perceptions of the economy and their willingness to continue a pregnancy. When women see after school programs and other social programs being cut, they are much less likely to continue a pregnancy to term. When women view the world as a dangerous place, they are much less willing to bring more children into the world.

Now, I'm quite sure you know where to stick your double-edged sarcasm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Boy---ya'll are out in full force today
oh! You got me all in a twitter! Why, you're right...why CAN'T cars run on aborted Feti?

:slaps forehead: Why, the answer to peak oil has been staring us in the face the WHOLE TIME!!!!!

:dunce:

Now, were you saying something, or was that a belch I just read on my computer screen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yosie Donating Member (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. And this slipper slope equating of abortion and stem cell research
is junk theology hoookum and junk science bull crap -- for the "Intelligent Design" and "Young Earth Creation" and "Rapture Right" sheeple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. I like his pointing out how the GOP took over the terms of debate.
This can only be good, to point it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. The democrats put the issue up for debate back when...
Clinton added the term "Rare" to a medical procedure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. also talk about conservatives trying to get women pregnant
through absence of family planning and health information,
boycott of funding for family planning clinics
and of course their baby selling factories when girls
do get pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. When did this deal about contraceptives get started in the GOP?
Is it a side effect of the right wing religious extremists trying to gain control?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. Good question
definitely a cave man mentality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinonedown Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. At least he is doing something
Goodness, seems we have been stagnant for years. We are finally moving. Up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'd be happier if he made a slight change
to more like this:

Unwanted pregnancies are rare, and abortion is safe and legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MamaBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Doctor Sells Out
Legal safe and rare equals expensive and hard to get. Insurance companies get to opt out on coverage ...

So they send their daughters overseas the poor women in rural areas get to raise big families on whatever they can get from Wal-Mart or Tyson Foods. Beautiful.

So much for the "doctor."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That's not what it means at all. Where do you get that?
What it does mean is that birth control information and birth control is easy to obtain, so that the abortion rate is lowered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Shame on you for twisting the truth like that.
It is about making information, counseling available instead of relying on abstinence....why do you think the rate of abortion has gone up under this administration? Teens are not going to abstain all that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. oh we have a machiavellian tactit here
you trying to be kniving and clever doesn't work with us here. Stop trying to twist his words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why do these people continue to pretend they're reframing...
& then insert the term "rare" into a medical care issue. Abortion should be safe & legal, with no stipulations. The language needs to be changed from anything to do with pro this or that, completely, & explained as basic women's rights, as protected under the Constitution. Drop the term "right to choose" & start talking about maintaining adequate, safe, medical care for all women, including availability in rural & disadvantaged areas.

If he is really serious about changing the debate, he needs to separate the economics from the medical, where reproduction is concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. They should be rare.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. As far as abortions being rare
The number of abortions have increased in bush's term because he put the squeeze on poor people. This should be pointed out over and over by democratic party people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC