Why is the DNC silent on the computer voting issue?

[Sperk]

Surely they know what the next scheme is. They keep asking for money though? Why the hell should I give any money to ANYONE if the vote is going to be rigged anyway? :shrug: :mad:

[lindashaw]

It really disturbs me

[Atlant]

1. The DNC hardly ever seems to see from which way the hurricane is coming.

They live in a world that has passed them by.

[Sperk]

2. by the way.....

they cannot have bushes approval rating in the 40's and then having him win the election, so that's how I know they're going to pull a MIHOP. They only know how to make Bush popular by devastating the rest of us.

[dusty64]

3. Their silence often

makes me wonder whats in it for them. A landslide lieberman primary victory perhaps or maybe a tit for tat deal with the repukes, I've yet to see the tat though as the rigging only seems to benefit the rethugs.

[hang a left]

4. No, I would think that Kerry would

be their man, or Clark

[OneBlueSky]

5. I, for one, am dying to see . . .

what the exit polling results were for the 2002 election (they're going to be released within the next couple of week, apparently) . . . I particularly interested in seeing what the results were for Georgia . . . still don't believe that Cleland lost after being way ahead in the polls a week before the elections . . . shifts like that just don't happen unless the candidate is indicted or found in be with a young boy (neither of which applies to Max) . . . should be interesting . . .

[XNASA]

6. Because they either want, or expect, to lose in 2004.

Those are the only two reasons I can come up with.

Why else?

[supercrash]

7. They don't say anything because...

It makes them look like they are still crying over the 2000 election, This will make them look like they are claiming that is was rigged.

This issue is very hard to approach without getting attacked with "Get over it"