Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did you know Dennis was the only candidate to agree to use

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:23 PM
Original message
Poll question: Did you know Dennis was the only candidate to agree to use
Roe v. Wade as a litmus test for justices. He tried to get the other candidates to accept this test but they felt other factors were more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. The likes of Hilary Clinton , Pelosi seems to be backtracking.
Edited on Sun Mar-06-05 02:29 PM by cyclezealot
Yet, some Dean people dump on Dennis because he was raised Catholic, is a committed Catholic and evolved into what is not the strongest pro abortion position..Dennis never lets us down..
Because he was raised anti choice, but evolved out of that narrow view some don't believe Dennis is real...Well he is and he has the most stringent pro view out there...
Yet, Dennis personally is against choice..his right...Sort of like Jimmy Carter...For this reason, DK thinks it possible he can bridge the gap between pro and anti choice factions..I think he could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dennis was a pro-life politician a few years ago. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No. That's a misconception that keeps getting repeated.
He had issues with funding but not with choice. Some women's groups sat him down and convinced him it was a matter of freedom and equal protection to also provide the funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Rationalization At It's Best. Funny How Those Women's Groups
only finally managed to "sit him down" just as he ran for POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was yet one more reason why I voted for him in the primary. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. How was Kerry's position different than Kucinich's?
"Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic presidential candidate, has said he will appoint only judges who will uphold Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion.
"


http://www.northeasttimes.com/2004/0902/bits.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. When asked during the primaries, Kerry wouldn't agree.
I realize that Kerry is pro-choice in essence. But there have been a number of anti-choice justices the Senate Dems have let get on the courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'd beg to differ as to Kerry's position during the primaries
This is from a June 2003 AP story:


"Kerry also has said if elected president he would only appoint judges who support Roe v. Wade, while his opponents for the nomination say they would not impose a litmus test on nominees. "


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/06/20/national1340EDT0606.DTL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I don't know if you have noticed it or not
but the dems have had trouble keeping the weed's appointments from winning nominations.


Which anti-choice judges are you referencing so that I can know the time span and what other issues were being debated or nominees considered?

Sometimes they have to settle for the lesser of 2 evils, which btw, is why I believe the repukes are trying to force the bankrupcy legislation down our throats, they hope to use it as a bargaining chip, okay, we kill it now, what will you give us in return, will you stop fighting all of our SS changes, will you back off of gannon?

I am not saying that bargaining in this day and age is correct, I say balls to the wall, fight them at every turn, but, some times you have to pick your battles.

I personally wish DK was more "presidential". How can we change his image to make it more electable? I would be proud to vote from him in 2008 if he had a more electable personality. The said through is a candidate has to have charisma and be sellable to the people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. " How can we change his image to make it more electable?"
By getting information out there, believe it or not. When A thinks well of B generally, it creates a 'halo effect' and makes B seem better in all respects.

So to make Dennis more electable, we only need to bring his history and policies to people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I have to disagree with you, that is not enough for the masses.
They want an image, not someone with a good track record.

You didn't answer my other questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. "You didn't answer my other questions."
What other questions?

(And you can disagree with me if you like about the halo effect, but don't you think you should read up, first? Try http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/halo_effect.htm or something similar to start. It's a well-researched phenomenon.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Dennis pulled a few Lazio moves...
...on the other primary candidates, as did Sharpton. I respect their positions, but their tactics sometimes were less than wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. that's not true, Kerry had Roe v Wade as litmus test also
Edited on Sun Mar-06-05 03:40 PM by JI7
see post # 9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Correct
He has also said he would fillibuster any appointments to the Supreme Court who supported overturning Rowe v. Wade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. Need to differentiate Supreme Court vs. Lower Courts
You mentioned anti-choice justices Dems have let get on the courts. There is a distinction between Supreme Court justices and lower court judges.

Judges in lower courts are bound by Supreme Court decisions. It is possible for a judge to be personally opposed to Rowe v. Wade, but as long as they are willing to abide by previous Supreme Court rulings, this is irrelevant. There is also the added safeguard that any decision they make which conflicts with this would be overturned in a higher court. While it would be preferable to go with all pro-life judges, it is not necessary for this to be an absolute litmus test.

On the other hand, Supreme Court justices are not bound by previous decisions. Therefore the opinion of such nominiees is far more important than the opinion of a nominee to a lower court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is there a point to this
Beyond polishing Saint Dennis' halo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. There seem to be some misconceptions going around.
And I was wondering what percentage were under these misconceptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. What is he, your drinking buddy?
Strictly first name basis, eh? You may have a bright future in tabloid television.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. From pro-life to a Roe v. Wade litmus test in just 2 years?
Did he have whiplash?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Kerry is pro-life too, I guess, and so is Kennedy, right?
Edited on Sun Mar-06-05 03:15 PM by genius
Come on. Just because Dennis had an issue at one time with PUBLIC FUNDING of abortions, people are purposely mis characterizing his position. He was convinced long before the primaries that public funding was a good thing.

As for personal opposition to abortion, that would make Kerry, Kennedy, and most Democratic candidates pro-life. Would you talk your daughter into an abortion? If not, perhaps your pro-life too. Hey, maybe we should pay women to get pregnant just so they can have abortions. The extremeness of people labeling pro-choice people pro-life (with the false implication that they are anti-choice) is unbecoming of a Democrat. If you were just parroting back what someone else told you my comments are meant for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That would be news to them, genius.
They never VOTED that way, unlike Dennis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. But it's based on the same rationale used to mislabel Dennis.
Edited on Sun Mar-06-05 03:19 PM by genius
Be consistent. And no, Dennis never voted to outlaw abortions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I am being consistent.
It's Dennis who is being the expedient hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Albert Einstein Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Genius is right.
You need to be consistent or your attacks look just like flames against Dennis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. What is inconsistent, Einstein?
Well????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. *crickets*
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. "They never VOTED that way, unlike Dennis."
So what? They also never held a House seat, where such votes come up.

The important thing is where people are today. There was a time when Bush hadn't mocked a woman he condemned to death, either, or started an illegal war that has killed thousands of innocents.

Once upon a time Kerry spoke out against a bad war and the deaths of innocent people. Three years ago he voted for a worse war and today he'd still do it.

Once upon a time Dennis voted against Choice. Today he votes for Choice and speaks out strongly for it as a Constitutional right.

Which one moved in the direction progressives should value?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. To Vote Against Public Funding for Abortion Isn't Exactly Progressive


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. you're right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Albert Einstein Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. Of course, I knew Dennis was the most pro-choice of the candidates.
It could be because of that learning experience he went through that he was so much stronger than the other candidates on the choice issue.

However, there are a lot of people here who have it in for Dennis and who will lie about him non-stop. Don't let their flames get to you. Whenever, someone posts something about Dennis, the conservatives come in and flame him as if it is their number one mission in life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Yeah, conservatives flame Dennis over any tiny little thing...because
his agenda is so flawlessly democratic that they have to capitalize on every miniscule non-issue or they would have nothing to trash him with. IMO, Dennis is the best we have.

Right wing media, (particularly AM radio talk shows), has so successfully brainwashed most Americans toward the right that even many Democrats recoil at anything or anyone labeled "liberal".

It's really sad - because Dennis is one Dem that we can always count on to stand up for us and do the right thing even if it is not politically expedient for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Flawlessly democratic as in supporting the flag burning ammendment? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
32. Roe V. Wade is not the only topic in the world.
Roe V. Wade *shouldn't* be the litmus test. Judges' records should be looked at in their entirety... unless I'm misunderstanding the meaning of 'litmus test'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. You seem to be misunderstanding the meaning of 'litmus test', yes
It's the first test performed, not the only one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. Not true... Kerry has always said Roe V. Wade would be a litmus test...
KERRY: I will not allow somebody to come in and change Roe v. Wade. The president has never said whether or not he would do that. But we know from the people he's tried to appoint to the court he wants to. I will not.
MODERATOR: Kerry claims that you had never said whether you would like to overturn Roe v. Wade. Would you?

BUSH: What he's asking me is, will I have a litmus test for my judges? And the answer is, no, I will not have a litmus test. I will pick judges who will interpret the Constitution, but I'll have no litmus test.

KERRY: The president didn't answer the question. I'll answer it straight to America. I'm not going to appoint a judge to the Court who's going to undo a constitutional right, whether it's the 1st Amendment, or the 5th Amendment, or some other right that's given under our Constitution. And I believe that the right of choice is a constitutional right. I don't intend to see it undone. Clearly, the president wants to leave in ambivalence or intends to undo it.


http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_Kerry_Abortion.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC