Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House STILL hasn't spoken out about gannon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 07:42 PM
Original message
White House STILL hasn't spoken out about gannon
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 08:07 PM by deacon
evidently they they appove of what they did.

Latest Gannon links:

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/02/bush-making-aids-groups-pledge-to.html

JEFF GANNON: EROSION OF ETHICS

http://www.popmatters.com/features/050228-jeffgannon2.shtml


Discredited White House correspondent ‘Jeff Gannon’ gives another interview to Hill paper

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/index.php?p=133

Guckert scandal involves security issues

http://www.patriotledger.com/articles/2005/02/28/opinion/opin02.txt

White House AKA scandal deserves investigation

http://www.lahontanvalleynews.com/article/20050228/Opinion/102280006

White House stirs debate on media tactics

"The administration's attempts to control information is a hot issue - the sealing of government records, the secrecy of Dick Cheney's energy task force. For many people, the Gannon case fits right in."


http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/front/11009432.htm?1c

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. And this is surprising because....?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Technowitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're scared to do so.
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 07:45 PM by Technowitch
And somewhere in that pale building on Pennsylvania Avenue, is one or more men responsible for letting Jeff/Jim in.

Don't think it was because they thought he was a red-hot journalist, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoveMiamiB Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. self delete
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 07:56 PM by LoveMiamiB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoveMiamiB Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Speaking as an attorney, they're
doing the right thing. I would've advised them to do the same thing. I don't particularly like it, but it's a smart legal move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Our lawmakers need to put the pressure on, a more united front
to get this investigated needs to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoveMiamiB Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. agree!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Have any White House "reporters" asked?
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 08:14 PM by SpiralHawk
Or are they all too busy "bulldogging" the next hot press release of BushCo talking points from the Ministry of Truth?

In "honor" of thier esteemed and unchallenged colleague, the White House's premier propagandist "Jeff Gannon," I offer a choice BushCo Bible selection for "manly men"

"There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses."

Psalm 137:9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC