Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FWIW - The Gannon Story is Available (americablog)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:35 PM
Original message
FWIW - The Gannon Story is Available (americablog)
Monday, February 14, 2005

A man called Jeff
by John in DC - 2/14/2005 01:26:00 PM

WARNING: A number of the links in this story are to x-rated photographs, and some of those might prove shocking to some people. Please exercise your own discretion when clicking. (And, as you read, please forgive the necessary typos - I'm going for rock-solid facts, rather than spelling.)

WOLF BLITZER: Because one of the things, as you know, that were said is that you had some sexually explicit Web sites that you were working on. I don't understand what that is, but maybe you could explain that.

JEFF GANNON: Well, several years ago, before I came to Washington, I had registered various domain names for a private client. I was doing Web site development. Those sites were never hosted. There's -- nothing ever went up on them. And the client went on to do something else. - CNN, 2/10/05
Site 1

http://americablog.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. The linked pics are really gross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockerdem Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am not going to the links -- but whats the deal with the watch??
And the bulldog? Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Guckert is wearing the same watch in the explicit photos
and the bulldog is a graphic in the logo of the prostitution sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Bulldog is one of his whore names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. The bulldog is the logo on his website
the RY was the last part of the words Photo Gallery which If I'm not mistaken are some pretty risque pics of our dear fake reporter fromerly known as Jeff Gannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. He should put WHY IT MATTERS first, then the garbage
last. Some people won't make it through the porn crud to his analysis of why this matters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. And the xtian conservatives have a problem
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 02:03 PM by babylonsister
with a breast? Well, this should make their day! //sarcasm//
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. So the real question is this
how the hell did the secret service allow this piece of "conservative" crap to stand barely meters from the President? by the way I have nothing against hookers... but the back ground check should have brought this up...

I am sure the wife loves this too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yes. How did he get in to the press room?
At the very least, he might be the weak link in the Plame case, he is can't fall back on 'protecting his sources', right?

Now if only there are records showing who his clients were. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. give the blogers time
and don't rely on the press.... if the Secret Service has not destroyed those records, they will be found
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Agreed! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I don't think he's married...
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. So much for
Gannon/Guckert's cover story about developing a web site for clients....they are obviously his sites......

Ameriblog got it right at the end of the article....how did the West Wing let an obvious male escort (or is it m on m escort) have access to top secret infor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. How does a male prostitute build up the contacts that got him ...
into the White House on a daily basis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'd like to hear more about the rawstory angle
Something about a "relationship" with the WH press office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Okay, I KNOW it's about the hypocrisy.
But it's going to be so easy for the WH to say, Well, we didn't know about that. That's his old life. (like Bush's drinking, Lynne Cheney's lesbian novel, etc.)

Beating up the Bushies for being hypocritical is like beating a chicken because it has feathers (if I may coin a phrase).

We NEEEEED to work on the Plame angle and the connections to the White House, because if this is just a gay porn story, it's OVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yup. You are so right about this.
Being a hypocrite is not illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. actually that angle affects .... the secret service
If you think the secret service did not find this out, and consider it a threat I have a huge bridge to sell yuo... this is connected... they allowed a threat view secret documents. This man would NEVER get a security clearance of any kind because his past can be used against him, so tehy allowed a man who can be black mailed.... to view aboe TS documents? Now do you see the conections?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Yes, you're right...
This COULD be a big story -- and I personally believe that the sex angle is NO ACCIDENT, that the WH has connections to sex rings left and right -- but it's still too easy for the WH to deny involvement, imho. You know, like what happened with the WMD: well, we didn't know they weren't there! BAD CIA! Must fix that naughty CIA! And they get off scott free.

It's still too easy for the MSM to spin this as an innocent error on the part of the WH. And to say, what hypocrits the liberal bloggers are, to get so het up about gay sex!

WE know it's about the hypocrisy, and about whether this two bit whore should have been given press credentials and who gave them to him, and whether he was getting paid by Rove to lob the softballs and to print the press releases as news.

But the sex angle is going to suffocate the story, I think.

Who knows... guess we'll see how it spins out.

But the MSM never fails to disappoint me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. "Old life"? Like up to 2000?
That's freaking YESTERDAY to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. I don't disagree....
just saying, even if he was a prostitute WHILE he was pretending to be a journalist, they're going to say they had no idea about his private life.

Yes, they should have known.

But man... I'm getting to be 100% cynical about the chances of a good damaging news story getting any legs at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Just for the record
The article says it was active from October 31, 2001 until May 8, 2003.

Yes, that's yesterday to me, also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Oops.
My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. anyone wanna go over to freeperville and see what they're saying about
this? I would, but I don't want to soil my browser...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. One thing I don't like about Americablog's reporting on this....
...is the use of the term "gay hooker". Its like the use of the adjective "gay" some how makes it more salacious. The fact that a "hooker", heterosexual or gay, got a WH press pass is the story (and should be followed).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. I wish you were right.
But I think that the fact that he's a gay hooker, not a "ladies man" is a big distinction.

First, because this administration and most of it's supporters have been completely hostile to gay and lesbian FAMILIES. People who are in mutually beneficial, self-sacrificing relationships have been targets of scorn.

At the same time, however, they have been associating with and benefiting from an inappropriate relationship with a two-faced, low-life, turd of a homosexual.

Secondly, the fact that it's a man who prostitutes himself to men speaks to the corruption of power. Men have the power in the White House. It's almost certainly a man who put him in the press corps. Why? What did Gannon do to earn that?

If he had been an escort for female clients, there wouldn't be nearly as much cause for alarm because females don't pull the strings in the White House.

It's beyond salacious, although it may seem that way on the surface. It's important because of who holds the keys in the White House and how they've treated gay and lesbian couples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockerdem Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. One more question: Whats the deal with the receipts?
Is Roves signature on them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. The invoices prove that Jimmy Jeff
paid for the websites to be created, not just register the domains as he claimed.

He's a liar AND a whore. Plus the treason. He's a fount of "family values".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Dupe
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 02:32 PM by Toucano
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'll skip the links, too, thanks...
but this is becoming more interesting for the reasons John mentions. This guy is apparently a prostitute and a fake reporter approved of by the administration--with some connection to the Plame case!

It gets weirder and weirder, I must say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadAsHellNewYorker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. I can't stand this story, but AmericaBlog made clear its importance
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 02:04 PM by MadAsHellNewYorker
The question that connects the Gay sex prostitution, Reporter, and Plame investigation is very very simple:

Who was Gannon blowing off in the White House to get the access/promotion he did? Or, to not be so sexual about it, who was Gannon Blackmailing to get put in the cushy job of lobbing softballs?

This is much bigger then we seem to think. The sex, the CIA documents, the job itself are all tightly connected. I think its clear Gannon was doing Double Duty in the White House, but the question is with WHOM. and that is the smoking gun.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. Now we need pics of him and Bush.
That MIGHT sway the sheeple. He's connected to someone in the WH. KKKRove? Scotty McClellan? Bush? He is someone's "escort/lover/whore/prostitute/Ho"

Or we need a ironclad connection to the Plame case.

Hey!!!! I can't wait to see this on the MSM tonight! :eyes: Any bets that Olbermann will be the only one to touch this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. The comments on John's blog entry on this are hilarious!
bush has a thing for bald men--LOL! Too true, didn't someone here post a montage of pics of bush rubbing/patting bald mens' heads?

How did "Gannon" manage to meet with the president TWICE, as he said he did, if he was a male prostitute with no journalistic credentials?

YIKES.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
34. This is a step forward.
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 03:03 PM by Lone_Star_Dem
We know Jeff was a liar and a male escort. We know his site was active in October of 2003. That would put it right about when he started working at the WH. I think it may even have been after he was working there by a few months.

One person has already stepped forward to expose him. Will there be more? Jeff is a loose lipped ego maniac. Will that be death of him? What are the odds that this man has bragged about what he's been up? I feel they're pretty good.

Sex, lies and hypocrisy with a trail that leads to the White House press corps and reeks of a security leak.

It's like John Aravosis said, "Someone had to make a decision to let all this happen. Who? Someone committed a crime in exposing Valerie Plame and now it appears a gay hooker may be right in the middle of all of it? Who?"


FWIW, I've also noticed Jeff's lack of hair and went, hmmm.

edit to add: It seems odd to me that he was using the name Jeff both for his sex industry business and his WH gig. It's as if it were just another day at the office for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC