Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State of Delaware vs. James D. Guckert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:46 PM
Original message
State of Delaware vs. James D. Guckert
http://billmon.org/archives/001676.html

State of Delaware vs. James D. Guckert
State of Delaware
County of New Castle

I, William M. Remington, Director of Revenue of the State of Delaware, do hereby certify that assessment of: PERSONAL INCOME TAX tax (SEE ATTACHED - MULTIPLE PERIODS)


Tax in the amount of $9,484.00
Penalty in the amount of $7,697.69
Interest in the amount of $3,560.71
Totaling $20,742.40

Was made against:

JAMES D. GUCKERT
5721 KENNETT PIKE
GREENVILLE, DE 19807

That Notice thereof was given to the taxpayer by letter dated and mailed 09/09/96; that the same remained unpaid for ten days (10) after the assessment became final; and that the total assessment of $20,742.40 has not been paid to date.

THEREFORE, please enter this certificate as a judgement in accordance with Title 30 Delaware Code, Section 554. In accordance with Title 30 Del. Code Sections 533 and 534, interest will continue to accrue at a rate of 1% per month on the unpaid balance and penalty will accrue at 1/2% on tax only.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal at Wilmington, Delaware, this October 17, 1996.

William M. Remington
Director of Revenue

Case No. 96J-10-106
Superior Court of New Castle County, DE





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. not sure if this is useful, or if it's been posted before
but kicking just in case..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, now this I love!!!
And I am just going to have to keep this one fed
and kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION OF THIS SLEAZEBAG! Sign the petition
Sign the petition and spread the word!
http://democrats.com/gannon

To: George W. Bush, Alberto Gonzales, Congress, and the Media

We demand the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to investigate the "journalist" using the pseudonym "Jeff Gannon" (James Dale Guckert) who attended daily press briefings at the White House and was regularly called upon by Scott McClellan.

Obviously "Jeff Gannon" is not a bona fide journalist and should never have been given White House press credentials.

In 2003, top White House officials gave "Jeff Gannon" exclusive access to an internal CIA memo that named Joseph Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, as a covert CIA agent.

It is obvious that there was a conspiracy between "Gannon," McClellan, and other top White House officials to run "smear" campaigns against White House "enemies" and to interfere with tough questions by real White House reporters. This is unacceptable in a Democracy.

In addition, "Jeff Gannon" may have dabbled in male prostitution rings (through registration of sites like Hotmilitarystud.com, Militaryescorts.com, and Militaryescortsm4m.com) which raises the possibility he was bringing male prostitutes into the White House or other institutions of our government.

These issues go infinitely beyond the charges involving Monica Lewinsky and therefore demand immediate investigation and prosecution.

Sign the petition and spread the word!
http://democrats.com/gannon




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. done
thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Done! Signed the Gannon petition...
...plus three more while I was at it! Thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsMagnificent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Done *kick*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Press Gaggle with Scott McClellan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Isn't there are picture of Bush with the "Gannon's" on his ranch?
Someone posted that yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Have you seen this? The "Gannon's" at Crawford?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. We miss our friends and they're here at The Pig Farm, e.g. The Gannons
<snip>

THE PRESIDENT: I guess they don't know what it's like to be the President. (Laughter.) I get plenty of quality time with a lot of really good people. Sometimes, it's important to just get away as well.

Plus, you know, one of the things we miss in Washington is our friends. And they're here. We've got the Weisses here, the Gannons are here, Pam Nelson is here. And we find it really relaxing to sit down on the porch with our buddies and just shoot the breeze. And, you know, it's amazing. You don't have to defend any policy you make. I mean, your friends are your friends. These people were friends of mine before I became President, they'll be friends of mine after I'm the President. And people just take you for what you are.

More:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/08/2001082...

So, Gannon was at The Crawford Pigfarm as a GUEST and a FRIEND!

Bush was hosting sleep-over parties for gay prostitutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsMagnificent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Nice catch guys!
disseminate that! The bloggers should know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. The Gannons AND Condi (plus Scalia = orgy)
Q You've done some work out of here. Has it been more difficult to work out of here or --

THE PRESIDENT: No, it's just the same. You know, when you pick up the phone and you call de la Rua to talk to him about Argentina, it's -- it may be a different hookup, but it's the same voice.
Yesterday -- as a matter of fact, in some ways, this place is better for work. Yesterday, we spent -- well, they arrived at 10:00 a.m. It took a while to get the press conference. We got back here at about 11:30 a.m. and met until 5:15 p.m. I think they left. That's the longest meeting I've had in a long time, on a very important subject. And so it gave us a chance to sit back and relax. It was a much less hectic schedule.
Therefore, we had a good chance to talk about a really important subject, which is our military strategies. And so in some ways, it lets -- this place allows for more in-depth discussions. Condi and I spend a lot of time just sitting around visiting about our foreign policy matters.

August 25, 2001
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/08/2001082...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. isn't this a different Gannon ?
someone stated in another thread it was some sports figure and family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. What they knew and when they knew it.
McClellan admitted today that he knew that "Jeff Gannon" was not the reporter's real name. Yet at numerous televised press briefings he addressed him as "Jeff."

Senator Frank Lautenberg today asked McClellan to immediately release all documents related to what the White House knew about "Gannon," and when they knew it.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_di...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another KICK
Below is just a sample of Gannon/Guckert in action at a 2004 White House press briefing. Bush's press secretary Scott McClellan was, as the Washington Post's Dan Froomkin put it: "getting hammered with questions about the 9/11 commission and the possible inappropriate juxtaposition of a visit to a 9/11 memorial with a fundraiser." And then along comes white night Jeff Gannon with administration-blessed access:

McClellan: "Go ahead, Jeff."
Gannon: "Thank you. First of all, I hope the grand jury didn't force you to turn over the wedding card I sent to you and your wife. (Laughter.) Do you see any hypocrisy in the controversy about the President's mention of 9/11 in his ads, when Democratic icon Franklin Delano Roosevelt's campaign issued this button, that says, 'Remember Pearl Harbor'? I have a visual aid for folks watching at home."
McClellan: "You're pointing out some historical facts. Obviously, Pearl Harbor was a defining moment back in the period of World War II, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt was strongly committed to winning World War II and talked about it frequently."
Gannon: "So you think it certainly is valid that the President does talk about it and --"
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/2005/02/002896.htm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Did you see Atrios' post yesterday?
It looks like Rove already has a replacement working hard to protect Scotty from those nasty reality-based reporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. another good Republican who won't pay his taxes
why should he give any of his hard earned payola to those welfare queens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. IOKIYAR Syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. from the same link in the OP
Case No. 96J-10-106
Superior Court of New Castle County, DE

Postscript: According to the clerk of the court's office, the judgment is still outstanding, and still accumulating interest, as of February 10, 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. So this *hole expects everryone else to carry his load???? n/t
Edited on Thu Feb-10-05 08:30 PM by banana republican
Did he ever pay it???

Or does he expect everyone else in the state to pay for his greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Apr 20th 2014, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC