Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good read about SS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MARALE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 12:34 PM
Original message
Good read about SS
This was writen by a friend of mine, he is a very intelligent man and we have talked about SS lately. He sent me this and it is a great consensus on SS. He did write it, it is not a bogus RW like email.


Subject: Social Security

A close relative, a graduate from a very prestigious engineering school,
retired for a quarter of a century, has been a vehement critic of Social
Security since it's inception. This person during his fine career
conservatively invested for retirement in stocks and bonds that would
provide a high standard of living during retirement (without any need for
Social Security, thankyou). Then corporations cut back on dividends in
favor of capital growth which directly affected income of the retired.
There were a few market downturns, especially the 2001 bust. Now this
couple relies on Social Security to keep their house and pay medical bills.
(Corporate insurance was also eroded away during those years from a once
comprehensive protection to the current HMO where, in crisis, the doctor is
different at every visit, and often, as well, is the diagnosis. Coverage
is incomplete and very complicated.) Private brokers will become wealthy
from the commissions no matter what the market does. Don't misunderstand, I
support 401K-type retirement accounts, but they should be monies that you
can afford to loose without becoming homeless or indigent when you become
aged and the market drops.
The scenario, assuming funds are diverted from Social Security, will
likely be: Enormous cash will enter the market for many years thus
inflating the market as we saw in the late '90's. Everyone will be quite
happy with their personal results. Then mass retrevals will begin at
mid-century resulting in market stagnation, and a prolonged bear market.
Those needing the income will find that they only have a half-to-a-tenth of
what they planned for and the Social Security cushion will not be there for
them. My own tax-sheltered account (I recently retired) is only about a
quarter of what it was projected to be when I initiated it a
third-of-a-century ago.
A letter to the editor in our paper says it better than I can:
DON'T GALBLE ON WALL STREET WITH OUR NEST EGG
In 1939, two-thirds of America's senior citizens lived in their "golden
years" in cold, hard poverty. Just a decade later, that percentage was down
to half. By 1959, it was only one-third. Today, the number is less than 10
percent.
That's progress. What's progressive about it is that this decline in
poverty is the result of the New Deal's passage of our nation's landmark
Social Security program.
Yes, the very same program now under attack by Wall Street wolves and
congressional oportunists of both parties who insist that Social Security is
doomed to failure and facing an imminent financial crisis.
Horsedooties.
First, this is a program that actually works, providing the modicum of
income so our gray-haired citizens have a basic level of decent living when
their earning years are over. Second, Social Security is a model of
efficiency, requiring only a single percent in administrative costs.
Compare that to the insurance corporations that suck out one-third of our
health-care dollars to pay for their corporate bureaucracies, executive
salaries, marble palaces and advertising.
Without changin anything, Social Security is financially sound for the
next 40 years. Yet, the Bushites -- on behalf of Wall Street finaglers --
seek to privatize this public treasure, pushing people to put their Social
Security nest egg into the stock market. These are the same investment
geniuses who only three years ago would have advised you to invest in Enron
-- a stock that fell from $97 a share to 57 cents in only one year.
--T N, DsM Reg., 1/15/05
Any retirement modification by congress should be limited to improvements
in the 401K and other tax-sheltered accounts currently available to anyone
who wishes to save in that manner. I hope you will become vocal and
pro-active in an effort to thwart any attempt to privatize any aspect of
Social Security, and please urge congress to make necessary adjustments now,
to insure the health of the program for the remainder of the century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC