Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does any other "Free" country have a Fox News-like Network?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:14 AM
Original message
Does any other "Free" country have a Fox News-like Network?
Edited on Sun Jan-30-05 11:16 AM by leftchick
I can only Imagine what many foreigners think when they see Faux news for the first time. I am sure they believe at first they are on Comedy Central and are watching a news parody show. Does any other (supposedly free) nation have this kind of propaganda network purporting to be "fair and balanced"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Australia for one. Sky in Britain.
Edited on Sun Jan-30-05 11:24 AM by JanMichael
There are plenty of RW mouthpieces all over the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Those just
both happen to be Murdoch outlets. Murdoch owns quite a bit around the world with focus on the US, UK, and Austraia. There is also some ownership in Chinese satellite TV viewership.

Most of the major mouthpieces all go back to the very few number of owners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. That's Why I Had These Printed Up

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetalFingersDOOM Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I like it.
Do you have it in a high-quality format?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I Had Stickers Printed Up by makestickers.com
and the bit map was generated by their order page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Sky is nowhere near as bad as Fox
it's more balanced than, say, CNN in the USA. I'd say it's comparable to the US broadcast networks, or CNN International.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. It mosty just flash and trash.
Which serves the RW just as much as the US/FOX talking heads.

But in the sense of overt Reichwinging you're right, it's not as bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. CNNI is not as bad as CNN. I actually watch them sometimes.
By the way:

CNN = FOX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I understand that, perhaps I asked the wrong way...
Edited on Sun Jan-30-05 11:23 AM by leftchick
It seems to me A lot of Americans believe Fox is real news. I guess the question then is the RW media in other countries acknowledged for what they are? I do not think Fox is at all except in Liberal circles here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. But UK and Oz both have the Fairness Doctrine
Even Murdoch's trash can't get away with the bullshit Faux MOos does, or they'd lose their broadcast licenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassicDem Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. Wrong Post Sorry.
Edited on Sun Jan-30-05 04:22 PM by ClassicDem
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Al-Jazeera serves the fundamentalist Islamic point of view
Weird to think of it that way, but they are the voice of the Islamic version of conservative, nationalistic thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. that is such BS...
Edited on Sun Jan-30-05 11:24 AM by leftchick
perhaps the Arabic version of Al jazeera is but I can't read it so I don't know for sure. I read the English version daily and find it extremely credible vs much of the US media. What you have said is a RW talking point that doesn't pan out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. I appreciate your different point of view
but I don't appreciate being slapped with the RW talking point label. Can we respectfully disagree with each other without being abrasive?

I read it, too, and am glad for the alternate point of view. It often takes a strong pan-Arabic perspective, Arab "patriotism" if you will, and that's what reminded me of Fox News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I don't think al Jazeera is fundamentalist
it's more 'Arab man on the street', tending towards being liberal. It will interview American and Israeli officials; the people who work for it have often worked for other broadcast networks like the BBC. If you haven't seen 'Control Room', try to - it's a documentary about al Jazeera during the invasion of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Fundamentalist *is* such a loaded word, isn't it?
But I still think it applies here. Outside of the American connotation, fundamentalism refers to a basic acceptance of older, conservative religious principles. al-Jazeera does not mock or denigrate conservative Islamic thought, not that it particularly promotes it, either. But al-Jazeera's editors understand that a majority of their viewers hold moderately to strongly conservative religious opinions.

I agree with your "Arab street" perception, but the Arab street is decidedly not liberal. It's nationalistic, wary or even hateful of outsiders, and admires strongmen.

That's what made me think of Faux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Al-J was started by professionals from the BBC
Edited on Sun Jan-30-05 01:25 PM by Ms. Clio
It's a much more legitimate and credible news organization than Faux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I don't see Al Jazeera as particularly nationalist.
Perhaps if you mean Pan-Arab nationalism, but there is no Arab state.

Al Jazeera is critical of the various governments that make up the Arab world, for the most part, in a way that I don't think Fox News is with regard to our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quetzal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Al-Jazeera was the ONLY Arab/Muslim News Organizations
Edited on Sun Jan-30-05 11:31 AM by Quetzal
broadcasting the genocide of the Sudanese to the Arab/Muslim world until they were banned from Sudan by the oppressive government there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think Germany does. I saw some program on FSTV about the
German "President" (I think he's called something else but I can't remember) owning the publishing industry and the news. Anyone else see it. I think it was an Amy Goodman interview on Democracy Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. "Chancellor" and Germany also has the Fairness Doctrine
Lose your broadcast license if you do a Faux Moos and lie when you call it "news".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Thats sounds more like Berlusconi
the Italian Prime Minister. He owns several TV channels and newspapers, and has some influence over the state broadcaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. I know we are not free in Media but I hope the world remains so
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. Fidel Castro's broadcasts are based on the FOX model
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morgan2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. italy maybe
with berlesconi being both prime minister and the largest media owner, I'd assume he's doing something like foxnews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
20. Doesn't Berlusconi own/control virtually all of Italy's media ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Yes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
21. I think Al Jazeera is the Arab FOX. It's not quite as bad because they
have a little more actual news and reporting versus FOX which has more opinion. But they both have a slant on the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
22. In Venezuela they have Globovision which is the US Propaganda station
Up until this year, it was the only 24 hour news station Venezuela had. The corporate owners of Globovision spewed hatred of Chavez 24/7. This month Chavez put in new rules which is severly limiting the type of anti-Chavez propaganda Globovision can broadcast.

So while are racing toward corporate elite television, Chavez is working on breaking the corporate elite stranglehold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. That is very interesting...
Who owns Globovision? It sounds like a CIA front!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. It is owned by CNN
and is very militant in shutting down independent news across the globe. If you want to see what our media will be like in a couple of years, take a good look at Globovision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. In the UK we have BBC News 24
To get the appalling Sky (as well, I may say, as endless crappy US and home-grown "comedy" shows) you have to have a satellite dish - who the hell would want to do that? Pay more to have your intelligence insulted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassicDem Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
33. Check out what these Canadians think,
I was blown away by this website, I thought Canadians were smarter than this.

http://www.proudtobecanadian.ca/threads/postlist.php?Cat=&Board=biasedmedia&page=&view=&sb=5&o=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
34. I saw the most outrageous thing on FNC last night...
One of their lackies was doing a "tour" of one of Saddam's old bunkers, dont all shaky and "rough", and the guy picks up a pair of chemical boots and goes, "Hmm, one wonders why you'd need chemical boots in a country with no weapons of mass destruction." I'm like, WTF?!?!?!?!?!

And then more crap about how "While Saddam was defying the UN and building bunkers like these while starving his people..."

It boggles the mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC