Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The very definition of IRONY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 02:54 PM
Original message
The very definition of IRONY
GLENDALE, Calif., Jan. 27 - The Los Angeles County district attorney said today that he would probably seek the death penalty for the suicidal man who abandoned his S.U.V. on a heavily traveled commuter rail track here early Wednesday, causing a violent wreck involving three trains that left at least 11 people dead and nearly 200 injured.


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/27/national/27cnd-train.html

Pardon me for my gallows humor, but ROFLMAO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. The bizarre thing is I don't think it would fly in court.
Without intent, it's doubtful you could get a capital murder conviction in California. Unless they can prove that his actions were intended to kill those people, odds are they won't do much better than manslaughter or possibly 2nd degree murder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Negligent homicide
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 09:37 PM by McCamy Taylor
He can claim he thought his car would be smashed by the train which would be completely unharmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. Negligent homicide isn't a capital offense
Wouldn't carry the death penalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phusion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Death penalty?
Isn't that a little extreme?

This whole case is very strange to me. What was the guy expected to do in such short time? His car got stuck, right?

And why the hell wouldn't you just step in front of a train if you wanted to kill yourself?

Terrible accident, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Uh, people don't "step"...
...ANYWHERE in California. They drive, baby!

I just think it is so wild that the guy allegedly wanted to kill himself, then had second thoughts and abandoned the vehicle...so now the state wants to kill him!

If a movie were made of that, people would walk out in droves, saying it was just too unbelieveable!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
signmike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The current story...
that I hear is he drove around all night "trying to kill himself" -- trying to work up the nerve would be my guess...
and his wheels got stuck on the tracks and he was trying to get the Jeep off when the train came - said he was trying to push it off, maybe it stalled, finally changed his mind and ran to get out of the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. It could have been
a copy-cat act. We had someone in the UK vent his spite on everyone by deliberately stopping on a crossing. He wanted to take others with him. And he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. ****
It could have been a copy-cat act. We had someone in the UK vent his spite on everyone by deliberately stopping on a crossing. He wanted to take others with him. And he did.

He won't like having his life taken from him by others forcibly; but it's still too good for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. I'm sure it's status quo in Texas
But this is California so I'd hope that they have higher standards than this. Guess not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thats pretty funny.
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 03:14 PM by K-W
Shouldnt be a death penalty case though... but im sure emotions are running high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. So instead of Suicide by trainwreck or even Suicide by cop
this guy will become the first documented case of suicide by trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. EXACTLY! Now, who would star in the movie?
I pick Travolta to play the defense attorney. Evan Adams (Smoke Signals) for the defendant.

Dramatic trailer voiceover:

"He thought he wanted...to end it all! But then the terror began... One man against the system...when everyone forgets...accidents happen!"

That would be the movie title: "Accidents Happen."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You know, dood, "Suicide by Trail" ain't a bad title, either! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Or don't.... as in this case
Sometimes accidents don't happen. Then, you need a really bad defense attorney. Call Dreck Defense. It takes longer, but eventually we get the job done.

You are going to get in trouble with the politeness police for thinking this is funny. But it really is. America is tone-deaf to it's own ironies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. The death penalty certainly isn't a deterrent in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's also strange a 2 Ton SUV can derail a 100+ Ton train
Maybe they need a SUV-guard like the old cattle-guards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiosyncratic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The train didn't have the locomotive in front, or the results might
have been different. The train was being "pushed" by the locomotive.

It also might have been going 80 miles per hour when it hit the SUV. They said that is a pretty straight section of track where the trains can get up to speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. death penalty for manslaughter?
I didn't know that applied to manslaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think it's a DA wanting to make a name for himself n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Probably.
Which is a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You'd give him the death penalty for manslaughter?
You're not really a prosecutor, are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And those four cases would be?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Do you suppport AG for AG? Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. I'm thinking he IS Alberto.
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 08:10 PM by slutticus
LOL

Ahhh....he Disrupted Poorly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. I guess you can prosecute him for stupidity along with the
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 07:06 PM by superconnected
murder charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
35. i hate to call out a fraud
... but this guy is not a prosecutor. Maybe a first year law student who wants to be a prosecutor (and then it'd have to be one who didn't do well in CrimLaw). Maybe victim/witness coordinator. But not a prosecutor.

The touchstone element of a capital murder conviction in every state, including Florida, is premeditation (although there is an exception in the case of the felony murder rule in some states; in others, felony murder is second degree). The easiest route for this guy to escape the death penalty is by casting reasonable doubt on that element. There's no reason to risk alienating the jury with an insanity defense, especially considering all the evidenciary problems with that defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TOOLZ Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. If he wasn't feeling bad enough to kill himself before...
he had no idea how awful you really can feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. a murderer is a murderer wether they are voting for murder or
carrying it out themsevles.

What this man did was an accident. People who support his death while thinking they aren't getting blood on their hands, are still murders. They are suggesting he be tried for murder and then it can be decided if they want to try him for the death penalty. It's a call for blood.

My freeper boss already told me this morning the guy should be executed even though I pointed out the below quote from the artical.

"The SUV was stuck between tracks away from a crossing and once there, he could not have moved it even if he had tried, Metrolink CEO David Solow said. The southbound train that struck it bolted skyward, hit a parked Union Pacific railcar, then clipped the northbound train. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. I refuse to believe that a prosecuting counsel
is unable to spell 'jugular'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Agreed. Had that same thought.
When did progressives become so enthusiastic to have people killed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. The most appropriate punishment is life w/ permanent suicide watch.
Then again, that may violate the "cruel and unusual punishment" amendment to the Constitution. I'll have to check with noted authority Alberto Gonzales on that one.

<sarcasm off>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tacos al Carbon Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. Oh, God, this is gonna cost millions
Couldn't we just give this guy a rope and a few minutes alone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlienGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Isn't this a good argument for assisted suicide?
Shouldn't people be able to go to their doctor, for whatever reason--not limiting it to fatal illnesses or anything--and request a certain and painless death?

With legalized assisted suicide, this guy could have just gone to his doctor and gotten a shot, and none of this would have happened...and think of all the money that would be saved...

Tucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tacos al Carbon Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Well, actually, no
Because, ultimately, he decided he wanted to live. If anything, it's an argument for the opposite since it shows that people might change their minds at the last moment. This is just such a screwed-up story all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
38. Wouldn't it punish him more to keep him alive?
That was my first thought, anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC