Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would you offer amnesty to journos to build a case against Bush?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:11 PM
Original message
Poll question: Would you offer amnesty to journos to build a case against Bush?
We now have two cases of journalists accepting payment from the Bush Administration to promote their programs - Armstrong Williams and now Maggie Gallagher. I predict that with the recent FOIA rush, more cases will emerge. However, I don't think everyone will be caught - some are bound to get away.

Would you be willing to offer amnesty to other journalists that have accepted payment for similar services if it helped build a legal case against the Bush administration?

Sorry, polls are turned off at Level 3.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hold them up to scrutiny AND help citizens
...understand that BushCo is all about propaganda? Sounds like a clear winner to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But verdicts from the court of public opinion lessen with time...
How else would nutjobs like G. Gordon Liddy and Ollie North have come back from their respective scandals to establish radio shows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. By playing to the people who love their brand of sleaze
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 10:38 PM by Spiffarino
Ollie and Liddy have gained fame (or notoriety in the minds of progressives) and this makes them marketable. I don't think there's a lot of love out there for them. However, you are correct in that they're given a pass in the MSM for past misdeeds. Again, I go back to their being marketable to a certain crowd that loves reactionary scum. Media whores don't care where they get their fame fix...just as long as they get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You make a good point, plus I thought of another
The pundits LEAST likely to take money from the Bush Admin (IMHO) are those who are loud proclaimers anyway (Rush, Hannity). They are funded, but by more traditional means (think tanks, book deals).

The pundits who will have accepted contracts (again IMHO) would be those who have a modicum of respectability, and have to hide said contracts to maintain the lie that they are "objective". Outing THESE people would subject them to scrutiny that might have an effect - perhaps limiting their market value to the talking heads shows or (as Williams has already seen) limiting the reach of their voice by terminating their newspaper columns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's the outcome I fervently hope for
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 10:50 PM by Spiffarino
Will the MSM have the stomach to pursue it? Probably not. That's why it's important for people at DU and in the rest of the progressive community to raise the roof every time another benefactor of Bush payola is exposed. It needs to be scared into submission, and the most effective way to do it is to bombard media companies with letters, emails, faxes, and phone calls. If that doesn't work, march on their stations, offices, and headquarters. If that doesn't work, ???

The freeps and creeps have been pushing media's buttons for years. Unless we do the same thing, we will cease to be relevant.

on edit: You are so right. The Rushes and Hannitys don't need payola to keep spouting. They get their Bush money filtered through organizations like the Scaife Foundation. As long as they keep making their millions, they'll say and do whatever they're told.

EDIT edit: Happy one year anniversary on DU, AzCat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oh gosh - has it been a year?
Thanks Spiffarino - it's hard to believe that there was life before DU.


I agree re. activism and the MSM - this may be similar to the reluctance of police to testifying against other police. The MSM doesn't want to see its overall image tarnished and needs to be hounded until they see that covering this issue is in their best interest - that a liberal audience is not going to stay if they give this a pass, that it will only get worse if they cover it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Time flies when you're P.O.'d!
I'm still a relative newbie here, but I've developed a nice case of carpal tunnel what with all the type-ranting.

I'm glad to hear you mention the "liberal audience" out there. The MSM doesn't get it if it thinks everybody wants Fox News. Cable news is slowly going down the tubes because they're forgetting the other half of America - the left - is not content with the current situation and wants its story told.

I sincerely hope a wise entrepreneur will step forward and create a Fox News for the left. We desperately want and need a voice. Plus, in the right hands it could be a serious moneymaker. I would gladly invest some of my 401K in a venture of that kind if a Ted Turner or George Soros ponies up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Aug 31st 2014, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC