Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FAIR Media Advisory: The Return of PSYOPS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 09:15 AM
Original message
FAIR Media Advisory: The Return of PSYOPS
FAIR-L
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
Media analysis, critiques and activism

http://www.fair.org/press-releases/cnn-psyops-fallujah.html

MEDIA ADVISORY:
The Return of PSYOPS
Military's media manipulation demands more investigation

December 3, 2004

The Los Angeles Times revealed this week (12/1/04) that the U.S. military
lied to CNN in the course of executing psychological warfare operations,
or PSYOPS, in advance of the recent attack on Fallujah. This incident
raises serious questions about government disinformation and journalistic
credibility, but recent discussions of the government's propaganda plans
have excluded some valuable context.

In an October 14 on-air interview, Marine Lt. Lyle Gilbert told CNN
Pentagon reporter Jamie McIntyre that a U.S. military assault on Fallujah
had begun. In fact, the offensive would not actually begin for another
three weeks. The goal of the psychological operation, according to the
Times, was to deceive Iraqi insurgents into revealing what they would do
in the event of an actual offensive.

This operation raises obvious questions about the government's use of
media to broadcast disinformation at home and abroad-- not to mention
questions about journalistic gullibility and reluctance to question
official claims. But the CNN story has received little pick-up so far
from other news outlets-- and when it is covered, it's treated like an
isolated episode, even though recent history shows that U.S. government
plans to deceive journalists and the public are widespread and systematic,
not aberrational.

Shortly before the launch of the "war on terror," an unnamed Pentagon war
planner seemed to warn journalists everywhere when he told Washington Post
reporter Howard Kurtz: "This is the most information-intensive war you can
imagine.... We're going to lie about things." (9/24/01)

In February 2002, the New York Times reported that the Pentagon's Office
of Strategic Influence (OSI) was "developing plans to provide news items,
possibly even false ones, to foreign media organizations" in an effort "to
influence public sentiment and policy makers in both friendly and
unfriendly countries."

The story got widespread attention, and the Pentagon announced that the
office would be eliminated. But considerably less media attention was
paid when Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld later said that, while the OSI
had been closed, its mission would be taken up by other agencies.

As Rumsfeld put it, "I went down that next day and said 'Fine, if you want
to savage this thing, fine-- I'll give you the corpse. There's the name.
You can have the name, but I'm gonna keep doing every single thing that
needs to be done and I have.'" (FAIR Media Advisory, 11/27/02) So the
revelation that a misinformation campaign bearing a striking resemblance
to the description of the OSI was actually being carried out ought not to
come as a total surprise.

Earlier this year, another Los Angeles Times scoop (6/3/04) revealed that
one of the most enduring images of the war-- the toppling of the statue of
Saddam Hussein in a Baghdad square on April 9, 2003-- was a U.S. Army
psychological warfare operation staged to look like a spontaneous Iraqi
action:


"As the Iraqi regime was collapsing on April 9, 2003, Marines converged on
Firdos Square in central Baghdad, site of an enormous statue of Saddam
Hussein. It was a Marine colonel-- not joyous Iraqi civilians, as was
widely assumed from the TV images -- who decided to topple the statue, the
Army report said. And it was a quick-thinking Army psychological
operations team that made it appear to be a spontaneous Iraqi
undertaking."


CNN's history of voluntary cooperation with PSYOPS troops is also worth
considering. In March 2000, FAIR and international news organizations
revealed that CNN had allowed military propaganda specialists from an Army
PSYOPS unit to work as interns in the news division of its Atlanta
headquarters.

As FAIR reported at the time (3/27/00), some PSYOPS officers were eager to
find ways to use media power to their advantage. One officer explained at
a PSYOPS conference that the military needed to find ways to "gain
control" over commercial news satellites to help bring down an
"informational cone of silence" over regions where special operations were
taking place.

And a 1996 unofficial strategy paper written by an Army officer and
published by the U.S. Naval War College ("Military Operations in the CNN
World: Using the Media as a Force Multiplier") urged military commanders
to find ways to "leverage the vast resources of the fourth estate" for the
purposes of "communicating the objective and endstate,
boosting friendly morale, executing more effective psychological
operations, playing a major role in deception of the enemy, and enhancing
intelligence collection."

Of course, the full extent of these programs is not yet known. But the
fact that the U.S. government is intentionally lying to journalists, and
by extension to the public, should be big news. Unfortunately, the L.A.
Times report is generating little mainstream media attention. CNN's Aaron
Brown reported the story (12/1/04), admitting that "none of us are
particularly comfortable when we're talking about things, about ourselves
if you will."

Brown also made another, even more revealing comment:

"There is an important and explicit bargain between the press and the
Pentagon in a time of war. We don't do anything to endanger the troops or
operations. They don't lie to us. Each is essential in a free society and
each is made more complicated by the information age, but it seems that
sometimes in an effort to mislead the enemy the military has come close,
very close, to crossing the line and misleading you."

Of course, in this case the military did not come "very close" to
misleading the public; they did mislead the public. And while Brown may
have confidence that such a "bargain" exists between the press and the
military, it would appear that the Pentagon does not agree. If
journalists were more willing to accept the old adage that "all
governments lie," we might all be better served.

----------
FAIR
(212) 633-6700
http://www.fair.org/
E-mail: [email protected]

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nominate Topic for Homepage...CNN has gone public with this Aaron Brown...
Edited on Sat Dec-04-04 09:33 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
said,"There is an important and explicit bargain between the press and the Pentagon in a time of war. We don't do anything to endanger the troops or operations. They don't lie to us. Each is essential in a free society and each is made more complicated by the information age, but it seems that sometimes in an effort to mislead the enemy the military has come close, very close, to crossing the line and misleading you."

Of course, in this case the military did not come "very close" to misleading the public; they did mislead the public. And while Brown may have confidence that such a "bargain" exists between the press and the military, it would appear that the Pentagon does not agree. If journalists were more willing to accept the old adage that "all governments lie," we might all be better served.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luaneryder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Aaron Brown is delusional
in his thinking that the military does not lie to the press-in war time or peace time. As a public information specialist with the Army it was my job to ensure the media was given as little information as possible. There is no bargain; DoD will withhold, mislead, misrepresent where beneficial. I experienced the media/military relationship as highly antagonistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. PsyOps was involved with CNN before Gulf War ONE..it never stopped
just went "underground"....Does anyone really think that the rightward drift of CNN was an accident??

Slowwwwwwly , it turned :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. US Army "Interns" at CNN
"Practicing" for the time when...



Thank Robertson they're on OUR side. Right.

http://indyweek.com/durham/2000-07-05/cover.html

Oops. Forgot about NPR...


NPR news chiefs deny they knew of Army interns

Originally published in Current, April 17, 2000

By Mike Janssen

Sergeants from a specialized propaganda unit of the U.S. Army interned on NPR news shows over a nine-month period, according to a statement by network President Kevin Klose released last week. The April 10 announcement coincided with the publication of an article in TV Guide that revealed the surprising news.

Similar reports about officers from the 4th Psychological Operations Group (PSYOP) interning at CNN surfaced weeks before the TV Guide article, first in a Dutch newspaper and later in stateside media. Media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting and Nation columnist Alexander Cockburn suggested that the military was spying on CNN and highlighted the rich potential for conflicts of interest. However, CNN and NPR officials agree with a PSYOP spokesman: the interns did not influence the networks' journalism.

"No journalism was committed" by the interns, says NPR Ombudsman Jeffrey Dvorkin, who was v.p. of news when the interns were employed. Dvorkin says the interns answered phones, filed away scripts, and prepared program lists and schedules. Maj. Jonathan Withington, a public affairs officer with the U.S. Army Special Operations Command which includes PSYOP, adds that the interns carried equipment and did "background research," and stresses that they did not influence reporting. Regardless, Dvorkin calls the internships "a real goof."

The first intern at NPR rotated among newsmagazines from September to November 1998. The other two worked for Talk of the Nation, one from January to February 1999, the other from March to May 1999. NPR and Withington would not identify the interns or allow them to be interviewed for this article.

CONTINUED...

http://www.current.org/rad/rad007psyop.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. "No journalism was committed"
at NPR? I'm shocked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Journalism's been AWOL at NPR a looong time.
Cokie coming up gushing over Bush during Selection 2000 comes to mind. Then, again, Reagan and Bush got a pass. So where's the "Public" part come in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. I saw Wulf Blitzer harumping about this yeterday...
Edited on Sat Dec-04-04 10:42 AM by BiggJawn
I thought "Oh, shut-up, Lupe, you honestly think the Army wasn't going to LIE to you at some point?"

And then that thread about the BBC getting gaslighted by a fake "Dow Chemical spokesman"...

And the thread about the local Teee-Veee interviewing Mike Hunt and Claude Bawls at the mall....

And our local news reader telling us that Skyrosky helicopters was coming to town. It's SIKORSKY, Kid! Jeebus, doesn't ANYBODY check the daily pronounciation guide anymore?

*I* used to check it, after getting my ass reamed by my ND for mangling "Giacomo Agostini" one time...

Dumb fucking "Journalists"...All they do is read what pops up on the screen in front of them without thinking.

"Journalists"....Not a ONE of them fit to be a cum-stain on Edward R. Murrow or Walter Cronkite's bedsheets....

What a GREAT time to work in PSYOPS, it's SOOOOO damn easy. Just like chumming Bluegills in the spring. Throw it out and watch 'em snap it up....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC