Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ATTAC: Is it time to get a US group rolling? Or are we too rich & lazy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 01:16 PM
Original message
ATTAC: Is it time to get a US group rolling? Or are we too rich & lazy?
Edited on Sat Nov-13-04 01:24 PM by JanMichael
Yes, Bush is BAD, but many of the election issues are/were predicated in International concepts that have been digging in for years. NAFTA, WTO, FTAA, ETCETERA. Outsourcing, Tax Free Places for Plutocrats, Financial gambling (Yes, that's what it is) with Pensions, Healthcare Systems, and other assorted Social Democratic institutions. Basically turning the World into a Giant Las Vegas where some jackass in Montana can make a few bucks on the privatisation of some factory worker's pension, not bloody cool in my opinion.

Financial Markets are running amok and frankly unless something is done to Democratise the process there will be hell to pay.

Sooo...ATTAC, the Association for the Taxation of financial Transactions for the Aid of Citizens, was started up in 1998 to address this crap.

It's premise is to promote an international tax on currency speculation (the Tobin Tax) and outlaw tax havens, replace pension funds with state pensions, cancel Third World debt, reform (or abolish, my prefered action) the World Trade Organisation & in the bigger picture establish democratic control over the financial world.

From the ATTAC website, "Platform of the international movement ATTAC".

"The total freedom of capital circulation, the existence of tax havens, and the explosion of the volume of speculative transactions have forced governments into a frantic race to win the favor of big investors. Every day, one hundred billion dollars pass through the currency markets in search of instant profits, with no relation to the state of production or to trade in goods and services. The consequences of this state of affairs are the permanent increase of income on capital at the expense of labor, a pervasive economic insecurity, and the growth of poverty."

"There is still time to put the brakes on most of these machines for creating inequalities between North and South as well as in the heart of the developed countries themselves. Too often, the argument of inevitability is reinforced by censorship of information about alternatives. Thus international financial institutions and the major media (whose owners are often beneficiaries of globalization) have been silent about the proposal of the American economist and Nobel Laureate James Tobin, to tax speculative transactions on currency markets. Even at the particularly low rate of 0.1%, the Tobin Tax would bring in close to $100 billion every year. Collected for the most part by industrialized countries, where the principal financial markets are located, this money could be used to help struggle against inequalities, to promote education and public health in poor countries, and for food security and sustainable development. Such a measure fits with a clearly antispeculative perspective. It would sustain a logic of resistance, restore maneuvering room to citizens and national governments, and, most of all, would mean that political, rather than financial considerations are returning to the fore."

"To this end, signatories propose to participate or to cooperate with the international movement ATTAC to debate, produce and disseminate information, and act together, in their respective countries as well as on the continental and international levels. This joint actions have the following goals:

- to hamper international speculation;
- to tax income on capital;
- to penalize tax havens;
- to prevent the generalization of pension funds;
- to promote transparency in investments in dependant countries;
- to establish a legal framework for banking and financial operations, in order not to penalize further consumers and citizens; the employees of banking institutions can play an important role in overseeing these operations;
- to support the demand for the general annulment of the public debt of dependent countries, and the use of the resources thus freed in behalf of populations and sustainable development, which many call paying off the "social and ecological debt."


It's not that complicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. It non-denominational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds good to me, JM
I want to read all of it and think about it, but *something* has to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm in the same boat, something HAS to be done.
Something Independant of the US Party System.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gennifer6 Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Email Bono...
he can help start-up in America......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Good idea.
I'd forgotten that he was in to the debt relief wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe the rest of the world can make up for, the supposed 51%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Which 51%? Diebolds?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC