|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Lone_Star_Dem
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:44 PM Original message |
| Chris Matthews is jumping on board with the voting scandal! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
nadinbrzezinski
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Ok ok crazy theory |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthseeker1
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 6. Rather than "Watergate II" this scandal needs its own name |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Generator
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 12. Fraudgate, votergate or my personal fav |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99Pancakes
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 32. HA-HA-HA-HA! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| geomon666
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 10:01 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 47. yeah but... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99Pancakes
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 10:14 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 48. HA-HA-HA-HA! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 16. it's already got its own name: VOTERGATE |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| d_b
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 33. Exit-gate |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bsuz
(112 posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 34. Name for new "Gate" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bsuz
(112 posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 45. Another new name for " Gate" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlueStatesForever
(179 posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 40. Re-(s)elect-a-moron-gate |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roxy66
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 17. Hurt it more than it already is?....hmmm |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| m berst
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 26. "Regardless this is gonna hurt the country deeply..." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ithacan
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. I'll believe it when I see it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 9. I admit the thought crossed my mind too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jdj
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 28. Death to the mandate if nothing else!!!! Death to the mandate!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DuaneBidoux
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 39. I'm in favor of about 2,000,000 people in DC on Inauguration |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JerseygirlCT
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 35. That would be my guest. He's blunt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 36. Probably just trying to get us back to watching him. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlavesandBulldozers
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Tweety? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannylib
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 21. Exactly, he played right into the hands of the Reich Wing |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Let's see what his spin is... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Generator
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. I wouldn't get your hopes up with "Mr I voted for Bush in 2000" and |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| seraph
(895 posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Tweety will try and shoot it down |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roxy66
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 19. Is Tweety Chris Matthews? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannylib
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 22. From his bright yellow hair...makes him look like Tweety Bird |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GCP
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 24. It's the yellow hair and shrill voice |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 41. Bright yellow hair, shrill voice, AND... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 20. I think so, too. CNN's Anderson Cooper also did a dismissive non-story |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 29. Let's be honest |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlueStatesForever
(179 posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 42. You should send him that offer |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| springhill
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 46. There is absolutely no way he gained....... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. What a dork |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 18. Jealous is good, I don't mind if he works off that emotion |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GingerSnaps
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. What makes you think that Tweety will be on the voters side? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HoosierClarkie
(504 posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. I haven't watched tweety for a long time, but |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| seraph
(895 posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 14. Yes you do. Save yourself - don't watch. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ducks In A Row
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. More likely he'll ridicule like NBC did. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lefty48197
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. Not falling for it birdbrain. I won't watch your show ever again. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. I won't hold my breath that Matthews will treat the subject... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SheWhoMustBeObeyed
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. He can't take being trumped by Keith |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mike Nelson
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 31. I TOUGHT I TAW A PUTTY KAT! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cat Atomic
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. Knowing Matthews, he'll say the numbers are a "big deal" because |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 30. Sounds about right. We'll see. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raftysworld
(20 posts)
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:24 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 37. Or... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Generator
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 43. Oh man I'm dying of laughter here! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DuaneBidoux
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. We need to email him with all the instances of bs that has |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eleny
|
Thu Nov-11-04 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 44. He can kiss my ass |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
|
Thu Nov-11-04 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 49. How much you want to bet Matthews will make us out to be |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Nov 21st 2009, 03:29 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC