Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ralph Nadar for President?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 03:46 PM
Original message
Ralph Nadar for President?
Edited on Mon Sep-01-03 04:29 PM by zeemike
I will tell you strait up that I a strong Dean supporter (meaning that I opened my wallet and contributed)

But I want Nadar to run. And I want Dean to win the Democratic nomination and select Kerry as his vice president.
Then in about September of 04 Dean goes to Nadar (and this of course would have to be a secret deal if it is to work) and offers him the position of Attorney General if he troughs his support to the demos.
And in a October surprise Nadar endorses the Demos.
That seems to be poetic justice John Ashcroft handing over the position to Ralph Nadar
And just whom do you think that Nadar would go after as attorney General?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. ummm take no offense but I dont see Nader endorsing Dean
but interesting concept Nader in a presidential cabinet. No offense I dont see Ralph endorsing Dean, he seems to really like Kucinich :) I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Does Nader like Kucinich?
That's a good sign. My impression of Nader has always been that no one is good enough for Nader besides Nader.

As to a cabinet level position, I'd rather have him at the EPA than in Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yes he does
I am not a green honestly, now my views are more green than democrat, I went to a thing in Baltimore and Ralph spoke and Dennis was going do but wasnt there because he was in the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrongBad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Um...no thanks.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Im a HUGE supporter ...
Of Nadar ....

He is MUCH better than Nadir: who is SO low ....

Now: about that Nader fella .... who is he again ? .....

I fergot ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I think Nadar is a moran n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alex146 Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was hoping Gore would do this.
But no.

Ass hole Nader is the reason we have bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichV Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why AG?
What makes Nader qualified to be AG?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I don’t think anyone is better qualified than NadEr
He has been a lawyer for the last forty years or so what more is required?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Prosecutorial experience, maybe?
AG is like DA combined with being a police chief. I kind of doubt he's qualified.
I don't like the idea of a guy like Nader in there, because he has a massive grudge. I want someone who is as close to unbiased as possible. The law should be applied evenly, and priorities shouldn't be arranged according to a political agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DedEye Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. What makes Ashcroft qualified?
I don't really like the idea of Nader anywhere near the White House, and I can't possibly imagine Nader endorsing a moderate like Dean (who I support), but Nader would be qualified as AG to me because he'd go after corperate fat cats, rather than average Americans for the books they read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. havent seen you in a while
:hi: I agree with you
Ashcroft is qualified because hes a big time republican, loves to spy on people, is the thesis of a right wing asshole, and is a nuthead. Ashcroft is unqualified yes, and I think Nader would be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. That’s my point
He would go after the Ken Lays and that is where I see the poetic justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. Ashcroft is Qualified...
Because he is a fucking looser who lost his Senate seat to a dead guy and Bush felt sorry for him. Unfortunately in my opinion the only thing that could make a Dean, Kerry, and Nader team worse is if Hillary Clinton were on it. I would be just as afraid of that group as I am of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a marvelously psychotic post!
BTW, it is spelled "Nader."

Another flame bait at play!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I’m serious now
Just what is a flame baiter?
Do you mean the title? Do you think I am hoping that someone that hates Nader will also hate me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Thank you doctor
I know there was something wrong but I never dreamed that I would find it here on the Internet. I have a flame baiting neurosis. And a deep down need to be spanked. I am such a bad boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. and an ignorant moron
well...you said it :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. I edited this title
added a ? so that it did'nt sound like I wanted that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
40. Sorry for jumping on you, zeemike
but we had far too many Nader/Green/Satan flame wars in which no one wins, except for certain ideologues that seem to have trouble respecting the right of voters to follow their conscience.

Not even the Communist Party USA demands such blind, goose-stepping loyalty, as these ideologues that think that having a "D" after a candidate's name, makes it mandatory for people to vote for that candidate.

Consider this: Adolf Hitler (D-Bayern). Does that "D" make Hitler righteous? Of course not!

The real problem with Nader, other than the fact that he is as much pro-capitalist and a corporatist as those he criticizes, is that he is playing the same role that Ross Perot played in 1992. As Perot took votes away that would have gone to Bush, Nader took votes away that would have gone to Gore.

True, Gore pissed his assets away in the last election, but the point is that Gore did win the election. Gore won the popular vote in the nation, and Gore got more votes than Bush in Florida. Were it not for Justice Scalia and his Opus Dei cabal, and their intervention in the recount process, Gore would be in the White House today, not the usurper Bush.

The problem with Nader today is that he refuses to see how much damage another Bush term will do to this country and to the world. Nader doesn't seem to care how many people will die if Bush's war is allowed to continue (to be fair, most DLC Democrats could care less about how many Iraqi civilians are slaughtered for the sake of oil).

Nader is no more a real Green than Lieberman is a peace candidate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. No problem
I do want to know when I seem to screw up. But I did chouse the title to attract attention. This is a very fast moving forum and if you don’t get the attention in the first few minutes it is gone.
But as things went in 2000 even with the Nader Vote, Gore may have lost anyway. If 3500 Jews in one county in Florida can vote for Buchanon Who knows who the Greens may have voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. None of that will happen
Dean would not pick Kerry as his VP. And he definitely wouldn't let Ralph Nader near his administration. Why would Dean even consider a person who actively supported Bush over Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Hey
I can dream can’t I ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Nader Nader Nader....
Edited on Mon Sep-01-03 04:13 PM by Desertrose
not Nadir...although thats here we are thanks to *

as has been pointed out above...

this is certainly some different combinations!


Peace
DR

took out & rephrased a bit on edit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'd like to see the Beatles get back together. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Nader as AG Would Be Cool, Tho
...I'd buy stock in Depends undergarments, because the CEOs would be crapping their pants on a daily basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waggawagga Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. That's Cwazy Talk
Ever read Robert Graves' "Claudius the God"? Nader wants Bush to win for the same reason Claudius chose Nero to be emperor. He thinks if things get bad enough the people will rise up and restore the Republic. Nero was a crappy emperor. The Republic was never restored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. That’s sounds like
The traits of a megalomaniac and I just don’t feel that Nader is that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. oh, so now you spell his name right?
Maybe you should have thought of that before being a twit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devarsi Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #34
44. Jesus H, Terwilliger, who pissed in your cheerios?
give the guy a break :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waggawagga Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Huh?
I don't think it is megalomania on Nader's part. It's more misplaced idealism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. or, he's the only one talking sense
I tend to think the latter is true...especially given the evidence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. Deen? Howard Deean? Dine?
Doene? Doune? Dane? Diane?

What the fuck is his name again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durutti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. Don't Know, Don't Care
I'm a registered Green. I'm not going to change my reigistration. But I'm still voting for whoever the Democrats nominate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. No. Enough of Nader.
Caused enough trouble for Democrats in 2000. I'm not saying he was *the* reason Gore lost, but his candidacy was certainly one of the reasons.

Anyone but *, and no Nader, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Yes But...
He was a definite deciding factor, Bush won Florida by such a small amount that if a fraction of Nader's vote had gone to Gore he would've won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. WHO DA NADER 2004 ? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. Nader wants to destroy the Democratic Party
He has all but said that. He wouldn't accept the position if it were offered anyway. And on top of it I don't think he should be rewarded for his behavior in 2000, which is what you're basically advocating be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. you know...if I hadn't seen it posted...I never would have believed it
never! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Nader as Charman of the FTC!
Wow- now wouldn't that be cool.

A Federal Trade Commission that would stop rubber stamping all of these anti-competitive mergers and vigorously laws against unfair and deceptive trade practices-

Even you Nader haters out there have to love that.

Well, most of you, anyway....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-03 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
42. My contribution to the nascent Nadir campaign:




The Greens are welcome to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. better a Peter Pan outfit
than a pink tutu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bucknaked Donating Member (818 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Ralph Tresvant for pres! We need a man... with... sensa-tivity...
A man like, he!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Is the irony lost? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC