Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stupid Question Poll: Is O'Reilly Guilty?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Lone_Wolf_Moderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:46 AM
Original message
Poll question: Stupid Question Poll: Is O'Reilly Guilty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. The honest answer is "dont know"
Though I think we all suspect yes :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woody Wood Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. well
we all hope yes of course, but he's innocent until proven guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly
I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. Hi Woody Wood!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. LOL
I guess that's how much we really disrespect the man - of course with what we have we don't know, but we all sure f***ing HOPE SO. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hope so
It couldn't happen to someone more deserving. However, we'll have to wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obiwan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is the Pope Catholic? Does a bear sh*t in the woods?
Edited on Fri Oct-15-04 01:57 AM by obiwan
I don't want this deviant within 100 miles of my daughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. probably
i just hope justice is served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. of course

Guilty of being a hypocrite, bigot, blowhard, hack, chauvinist pig, dissembler, liar, and prevaricator, no doubt.

About the sexual harassment charges...yeah, that would take a first hand look at the evidence. But, having had way too much to do with SH lawsuits in the late Eighties and early Nineties, he fits and acts pretty much the SH perp type IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
webjamn Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. It doesn't matter
Whether or not he's guilty of sexual harassment, he has not denied making any of the phone calls and that will kill his career. I personally don't care if the woman gets a dollar from Mr. Pompous as long as he's driven from the airwaves. Stick a fork in Bill, he's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoceansnerves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. o'reilly would declare himself guilty
if he ran a story about this on his show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. O'Really has no friends any more
We hate him because he's an asshole, and now even RWers hate him because he hasn't been frothing at his mouth supporting every little thing that comes out of the chimps mouth. This little gem doesn't help him with them either.

His undoing is now inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No2W2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Don't know
Edited on Fri Oct-15-04 02:29 AM by No2W2004
When the tapes of him they made the transcripts from surface on the other hand, Bill is toast.

Until then, if you belive in the real system of justice, then you must say innocent until proven guilty.

As far as his career (such as it is) goes, Karma's a bitch Bill, ain't it? Time for you to shut up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. Who knows?
I do know this: if FOX has procedures in place for addressing sexual harrassment, and Andrea Mackris did not follow them, she will be left twisting in the wind, tapes or no tapes. I've seen it happen. She will embarrass O'Reilly but she will not collect $60 million dollars for it. O'Reilly will become a dirty joke for awhile but FOX will not abandon him.

I was cackling with glee when this story broke, but as more details come out it appears that Mackris has left herself wide open to charges that she is after money, not justice. Fair or not, FOX will paint her as a golddigger and that aspect will come to overshadow O'Reilly's harrassment.

You know the mindset - I'm sure it's as prevalent at FOX as it is among their viewers: Women like this kind of attention, and if they complain about it, they're just dykes out for money. If Mackris didn't like it, why'd she come back to work for O'Reilly after quitting once? Why didn't she hang up the phone and report him to management? Those are the questions she'll be hit with, and I hope for her sake she has good answers.

As discussed on Countdown tonight, the more serious issue for O'Reilly is his blabbing about Roger Ailes as hitman. Olbermann pointed out that if you really have that kind of power, you don't want some minion babbling about it.

We'll see who discredits whom. Sadly, from what I've seen in he course of my career, my bets are not on Ms. Mackris.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zara Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. since he's been civilly sued
not guilty, but liable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Hi zara!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. By Bill Clinton standards
O'Liely is guilty until proven innocent. Bah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. Not sure, but it sounds like her tapes will fry him.
It certainly may be true that she is into it for the money, but that doesn't mean he automatically gets off the hook because her motives are bad.

If her tapes show that she verbally objected to his harassment a few times and he kept on, she has a really good case even if it did take her a while to go to management. And as for the idea that she doesn't have a case because she returned to work for him and Fox, that's silly. You are not required to give up, or refuse to return to, a fabulous job in order to prove harassment! I would be willing to bet that she warned him off (on tape) and took the job the second time, as was her right, because the job itself was worth it to her, and she also saw a way to burn an asshole (whether for selfish or altruistic reasons). Either way, women win. Guys like this need to be gone. Everybody is truly sick of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. Yes!
Going to management at a media company about sexual harrassment is like asking for someone to write speeding tickets at the Indy 500.

Whether eventually found liable or not, the combination of what is alleged in item 66 plus item 81 will alienate O'Reilly's biggest fan base. If the tape comes out and has a certain noise on it then his career may well be over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. the reich-fuhrer of lies smells guilty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
19. would a woman really make up THIS quote?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. hehe.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. Not sure, but a full investigation is needed.
With great attention to every detail of the case--massively covered in the media, of course.

What eye-catching logos will TV news use for the story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'll give him the not sure for now....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alleycat Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. Innocent until more facts come out
Although after reading the info, it sure sounds like him. I have listened to him on occasion and the phrases and sentence stucture sure sound like something that would come out of his mouth. I can hear his voice behind the words.

And yes it's gross to picture that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djg21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
24. Perhaps.
They apparently have him on tape -- so he's guilty of being lewd and boorish.

Whether that amounts to sexual harassment under Title VII or the NY Human Rights Law is a different issue, that in large part depends on whether his conduct was welcomed by the plaintiff. Did she complain to O'Reilly and tell him to stop? Did she invite or willingly participate in the comunications? Did she complain to FOX' EEOC people in a timely fashion? If so when? Why did she return to Fox (at O'Reilly's invitation?) after going to another company if she believed that she was being harassed by O'Reilly? There are a lot of questions that will need to be addressed during pretrial discovery.

That being said, O'Reilly's credibility is shot simply by the fact that he's apparently captured on tape talking vibrators, etc.

He's a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
25. Don't know, but the whole thing sure is entertaining
I almost feel guilty about enjoying someone's downfall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
26. I Said "Not Sure" But. . .
. . .i am more inclined to believe it than not. He's slime. We already know that to be a fact. This behavior is slimy. Without getting syllogistic, there is at least reason to suspect it's true.

We'll see.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canuckybee Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
30. I said not sure
but only because I so want it to be true, that I cannot be objective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
31. I'm giving O'Reilly the same benefit of the doubt that he gives people.
In other words, he's guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
32. of course he's guilty
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
33. The women and her attorney
Edited on Fri Oct-15-04 01:27 PM by AmerDem
wouldn't be so out in front of this if they did have most of this on tape. O'Rielly is in deep doo doo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
34. Dild'O Jizzly is Guilty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
35. Depends. Guilty of what? Being a lying asshole and abusing large
vegetables? Probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. Not entirely sure it matters
If he fights this and it stays in what passes for "news" in America, he'll end up a laughingstock, no matter what- and quite possibly hounded off the air, even if he wins. If he settles quickly, and makes it all go away, then he's tarnished, but he'll keep his shows... and be the butt of jokes for many months to come.

It's pretty much a no-win situation. Couldn't have happened to a nicer fellow, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC