Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ethics report and letter to DeLay.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 04:47 PM
Original message
Ethics report and letter to DeLay.
Edited on Mon Oct-11-04 04:48 PM by napi21
http://www.house.gov/ethics/DeLay_Cover.htm

This is just a snip of the repremand letter sent to DeLay last night. The entire Committee Report and the letter is available at the above link.

(snip)
We note that your response to the Committee’s decision of last week included the statement, “During my entire career I have worked to advance my party’s legislative agenda.” Your actions that are addressed in this letter, as well as those addressed in the Committee’s decision of last week and in prior Committee actions, are all ones that, in a broad sense, were directed to the advancement of your legislative agenda. Those actions are also ones that your peers who sit on this Committee determined, after careful consideration, went beyond the bounds of acceptable conduct.



As you are aware, it does not suffice for any House Member to assert that his or her actions violated no law, or violated no specific prohibition or requirement of the House Rules. The House Code of Official Conduct broadly requires that every House Member, officer and employee “conduct himself at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House.” It is particularly important that members of the House leadership, who are the most publicly visible Members, adhere to this requirement scrupulously. The fact that a violation results from the overaggressive pursuit of one’s legislative agenda simply does not constitute a mitigating factor.



In addition, a state criminal investigation of the 2002 election activities of the Texans for a Republican Majority PAC, with which you were involved during the period in question, is underway. While Committee action on Count II of the complaint regarding those activities has been deferred pending further action in the state cases and investigation, the Committee will act on the underlying allegations at an appropriate time.



In view of the number of instances to date in which the Committee has found it necessary to comment on conduct in which you have engaged,<2> it is clearly necessary for you to temper your future actions to assure that you are in full compliance at all times with the applicable House Rules and standards of conduct. We remind you that the House Code of Official Conduct provides the Committee with authority “to deal with any given act or accumulation of acts which, in the judgment of the committee, are severe enough to reflect discredit on the Congress.”<[br />
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for sharing. Delay is such a scumbag
The letter from the House to Delay is great reading. I hope that Morrison can use it against Delay in the upcoming election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I heard about this on Ed Schultz show today.
He had a guest who was a member of some committee watch in Wa. She told Ed all about the letter of repremand, and that they effectively told DeLay you were a bad boy and we're watching you!

I didn't take the time to read the report on that site. I may later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC