Charlie Gibson: Whore? I think he has been pretty fair so far.

[TryingToWarnYou]

Opinions?

[PROGRESSIVE1]

1. Yes he has been fair but this is a National Debate. He would have...

Hell thrown at him had he been overtly biased.

[cally]

4. Check the time afterwards....Gibson continually gives * more time

I've seen at least twice where * gets his 30 seconds and Kerry gets nothing. I've also seen Gibson never allow Kerry his rebuttal when he wants one.

[RockaFowler]

2. I Like Charlie on GMA

I think he got pushed around from Chimp, though. I hope some people see that as overbearing and a man who went against the rules.

[cally]

3. He's completely biased

He just gave * another 30 seconds and gave nothing to Kerry. He does it over and over. It's horrible.

[blueknight]

6. anyone who watches gma,

knows he's a fucking re-pug to the bone

[Zomby Woof]

8. that's fine!

He is giving Bush enough rope... no matter what the reason may be... :-)

[kikiek]

5. Well Bush didn't exactly show him any respect.

[TahitiNut]

7. I've see his bias leaking out about three times so far.

I think Smirk knew he could get away with ignoring Gibson's moderating since Gibson's "one of the boys."

[w4rma]

9. He's been awful. He's easily the worst moderator. And he is doing exactly

what I expected of him.

That guy has refused to give Sen. Kerry a rebuttal when he's asked for it, and has let Bush have all the rebuttals he wants.

Sen. Kerry is still doing great, but that guy moderating is the biased I've seen.