Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. EPA 2003 Status Report Shows U.S. Air Cleanest Ever Since 1970(?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 03:42 PM
Original message
U.S. EPA 2003 Status Report Shows U.S. Air Cleanest Ever Since 1970(?)
U.S. EPA 2003 Status Report Shows U.S. Air Cleanest Ever Since 1970

9/22/2004 12:15:00 PM

To: National Desk, Environment Reporter

Contact: Cynthia Bergman of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 202-564-9828 or [email protected]

WASHINGTON, Sept. 22 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Total emissions of the six principal pollutants identified in the Clean Air Act dropped again in 2003, signaling that America's air is the cleanest ever in three decades, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reported today. Annual emissions statistics for the six pollutants are considered major indicators of the quality of the nation's air because of their importance for human health and the existence of their long-standing national standards.

Emissions have continued to decrease even as our economy has increased more than 150 percent. Since 1970, the aggregate total emissions for the six pollutants (Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Particulate Matter (PM), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Lead (Pb)) have been cut from 301.5 million tons per year to 147.8 million tons per year, a decrease of 51 percent. Total 2003 emissions were down 12 million tons since 2000, a 7.8 percent reduction. (See summary table at: http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/econ-emissions.html ).

"Thanks to this progress, today's air is the cleanest most Americans have ever breathed," said Administrator Mike Leavitt. "Now, EPA is taking up the challenge to accelerate the pace of that progress into the future."

The Agency recently issued regulations that will cut diesel pollution by 90 percent, and later this year will finalize regulations cutting power plant pollution by approximately 70 percent.

A major reason for the nation's progress is the innovative, market-based acid rain cap-and-trade program enacted in 1990. The Acid Rain Progress Report, also released today, shows annual SO2 and NOx emissions have declined 5.1 million tons (32 percent) and 2.5 million tons (37 percent), respectively, since 1990. The program generated double-digit cuts at its inception and is now maturing, with small fluctuations up and down as emissions gradually near their respective end goal caps.

"Cleaning the air gets more difficult as the maximum benefits from existing rules are achieved and the low-hanging fruit is gone," said Leavitt. "The sharp cuts of the early years of the Acid Rain Program are behind us now, and it's time to take the next step to protect people's health the next step is the Clean Air Interstate Rule."

The Bush Administration's Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) stands to be the acid rain program of this decade, enabling the country to once again enjoy sharp cuts in harmful pollutant levels. It will use the same proven cap-and-trade approach as the Acid Rain program, creating financial incentives for electricity generators to look for new and low-cost ways to reduce emissions early.

CAIR will use cap-and-trade to address power plant emissions in 29 eastern states plus the District of Columbia. The program would cut SO2 by more than 40 percent from today's levels by 2010, and 70 percent when fully implemented. NOx emissions would be cut by 50 percent from today's levels by 2010, and 60 percent when fully implemented. The Administration plans to finalize CAIR this fall.

"The Acid Rain Program is a national success story because we achieved early reductions, cost-effectively and with near-perfect compliance," said Leavitt. "CAIR will provide similar benefits, ensuring that our nation's air continues to get cleaner well into the next decade."

------

EDITORS NOTE:

For more information:

---

CAIR:

http://www.epa.gov/interstateairquality/

---

2003 Emissions Report:

http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/econ-emissions.html

---

Acid Rain Report:

http://www.epa.gov/acidrainreport

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=36695
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I DONT BELIEVE.....
anything that come sout of this so-called government! It's a complete waste of time to take it seriously even for 5 seconds....everything is political no matter how many people in this country have to suffer....fuck them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. is this the same EPA that
said ground zero was safe?



**Here if the Great Smokie Mts. the air is worse than ever...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Easy To Do, When Companies Report Their Own Results
Edited on Wed Sep-22-04 04:01 PM by Xipe Totec
(edited to add second data source)

Part of the 'self-regulation' boondoggle. Of course it's the lowest reported. :eyes:

"Most air pollution regulations require facilities to self-monitor their own compliance status. A typical regulation includes detailed monitoring, reporting, and record keeping requirements. For example, a facility is required to monitor the performance of a control device at specified intervals using methods provided in the regulation. The results of the monitoring will have to be reported to the responsible enforcement agency at intervals specified in the regulation. Finally, the regulation will detail the amount of time that a facility must maintain records. This system of self-monitoring, reporting, and record keeping is an essential component of EPA's overall compliance strategy. An air pollution permit includes all monitoring, reporting, and record keeping requirements a facility must meet to be in compliance."

http://www.epa.gov/air/oaqps/eog/course422/ce7b.html

WASHINGTON, D.C. and HOUSTON, TX. June 22, 2004 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state governments appear to be underreporting refinery and chemical plant toxic air emissions - including known carcinogens benzene and butadiene - on the "startling magnitude" of at least 330 million pounds per year, according to a new study released today by the Washington, D.C.-based Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) and Galveston Houston-Association for Smog Prevention (GHASP). The study is being released ahead of EPA's release of the 2002 Toxic Release Inventory (TRI), expected to come out this week. The EIP-GHASP analysis finds that the presence of the carcinogens benzene and butadiene in the air in the United States may be four to five times higher than the level the EPA reports to the public.

The study, which is based on findings by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), applies the Commission's findings on the underreporting of certain toxic emissions nationwide and concludes that at least 16 percent of toxic air emissions from all sources "have been kept 'off the books'."

http://www.ems.org/nws/2004/06/22/study_epa_knowin

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. They're right, but
a) it ain't gonna last because *bush is torpedoing all the regs that got us here.
b) most of the regs came out of california, especially the car regs. I recently moved back to LA after living here as a kid in the early 50's. We lived in the San Fernando Valley, and air there wasn't too bad - but when we went to downtown LA, almost every time my eyes watered and burned to the point that tears would run down my face because the air was so bad. It's improved vastly since then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fewer factories that make things.
We are outsourcing our pollution to India and China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booksenkatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's funny...
...back in 1970 when I was a 10-year-old kid in Texas, we never had to get an "air reading" first before we could go to recess, and we were never told "Oops, too much dangerous SHITE in the air today, kids, so we won't be going out at all."

Also, for the record, I developed asthma only 10 years ago. I didn't have it in 1970, either.

Just anecdotal stuff, I know.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. And that's why we've got to gut the Clean Air Act now, don't you see?
Now that the heavy-handed era of command-and-control legislation has worked, producing cleaner air as a result, it's time to roll back those controls!! Yee-hah!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Umm.. the Bush EPA removed several substances from reporting..
.. I believe that early on, they removed some items from the list of pollutants, so that the air would appear cleaner. Wish I had the data, but it was something they did right away. Less "pollutants", cleaner air. Don't buy that stuff they're peddling..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow, ditching those extra pollution control regulations really worked.
Edited on Wed Sep-22-04 05:03 PM by sfg25
Asshole* has his man Leavittjerk in place at the EPA.

Hey, the fish are now mercury free too.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, you can eat all the fish you want here! No size limit, either!
My ass.

Our air's getting cleaner and cleaner, but the state Department of Conservation advises against eating native fish more than once a month, and advises against eating ANY native fish more than 14" long.

But the air's much, much cleaner now. No, really! Honest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC