http://www.blogforamerica.com/archives/004915.html#moreSNIP..."I think all those other warnings were relatively useless. It doesn't do any good to say the sky's falling and not tell somewhat what part of the sky is falling and where you might want to watch out.
However, here's the dilemma that the administration's now gotten themselves into. The information is that these buildings are targets; probably the targets were also the World Trade Center and otherwise. Now we've instituted security measures, which I think is a good thing.
How--when do we take those security measures off? If these plans have been in place for three years, and if the administration contends, as I agree with this, that al-Qaida's very patient and this is a real danger, you can't take the security measures away from these buildings for the foreseeable future...MURRAY: Well, I think that's...
Dr. DEAN: ...not until al-Qaida is destroyed and until Osama bin Laden is destroyed.
So we are now--have these security measures in place for the foreseeable future. And there will be other building that have been cased, there will be more evidence like this coming to go light. I don't dispute that terrorism is a serious problem for the United States and that it's a good thing to put these safety measures in place. I do dispute the timing. I do dispute the relevance of this particular information at this time, given that Washington, DC, senior law enforcement people saying they don't believe there's anything new in these disclosures."
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
