elperromagico
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 08:18 PM
Original message |
| Poll question: Best WINNING Democratic Presidential ticket? |
|
Just so we can get some older pairings in there.
| Poll result (39 votes) | | Gore/Lieberman (2000) | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Clinton/Gore (1992, 1996) | (13 votes, 33%) | Vote | | Carter/Mondale (1976) | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Johnson/Humphrey (1964) | (2 votes, 5%) | Vote | | Kennedy/Johnson (1960) | (4 votes, 10%) | Vote | | Truman/Barkley (1948) | (1 votes, 3%) | Vote | | Roosevelt/Truman (1944) | (10 votes, 26%) | Vote | | Roosevelt/Wallace (1940) | (6 votes, 15%) | Vote | | Roosevelt/Garner (1932, 1936) | (3 votes, 8%) | Vote | | Other | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote |
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
you mean won by the largest margin, that would be Johnson/Humphrey in 1964.
IIRC they won largest % of the popular vote in American history.
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Yeah they did, but that was against Barry Goldwater of all people. |
elperromagico
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. I don't mean best in that sense. |
|
I just mean which ticket was the "best" combo, with "best" being defined however one wants to define it.
Johnson/Humphrey won by a margin of 61%-38.5%. 61% remains the largest percentage of the popular vote ever received by a presidential ticket. But Roosevelt/Garner won 60.8%-36.5%, a slightly wider margin.
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Roosevelt/Truman was a great ticket. |
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Clinton picking Gore in '92 was genius. |
|
I really wasn't very excited by Gore in 2000, but I can't imagine anything that could have been done in between '92 and 2000 (eg, in terms of picking a new running mate in '96) which would have solved that problem.
|
elperromagico
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-20-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 26th 2013, 01:35 AM
Response to Original message |