|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
| MikeG
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:18 PM Original message |
| Poll question: Who thinks that the phrase "girlie man" is sexist? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| bryant69
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. I think it was stupid |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NoPasaran
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. I think it's just stupid |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| patdem
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. I said yes because I saw that Nostjam commics..oops did not bump.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sandnsea
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. sexist and homophobic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aden_nak
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. Sexist, yes. Homophobic, no. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sandnsea
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. Really? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MikeG
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. No one has called them gay, just effeminate. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TeacherCreature
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 15. that is the stereotype that homophobes buy into |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sandnsea
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:47 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 23. Thank you. Exactly n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aden_nak
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:00 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 32. If Arnie had said "Little girlie-gay-men!" I would agree 100%. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TeacherCreature
|
Mon Jul-19-04 06:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 65. not all of us need to be hit on the head with a hammer |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PeaceForever
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 55. Good point |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nay
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 10. Amen, sandnsea. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Selwynn
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 40. its actually more homophobic than sexist. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Misinformed01
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. only a no account panty waist would |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Who thinks the sky is blue? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| UdoKier
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. Stupid and immature. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| yella_dawg
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. Stupid thing for a politician to say. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sparkly
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Tucker Carlson just ridiculed complaints that it was insensitive |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 17. Oh now that's telling, isn't it?! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sandnsea
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 24. Fuck insensitive |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. GIRLIE MAN????? they want to talk about a GIRLIE MAN!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nolabels
|
Mon Jul-19-04 05:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 62. A problem of impugning on others to minimize ones own failures is obvious |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| matcom
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. SEXIST? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MikeG
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 22. Trying to insult a man by calling him "woman-like" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| matcom
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 28. sure |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MikeG
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 29. Are you telling me I can't wear my pink tutu anymore? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TeacherCreature
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 25. Why is this so hard to understand? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| matcom
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 31. i would say you were a Moran for using the wrong racial slur |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TeacherCreature
|
Mon Jul-19-04 06:09 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 66. I wouldn't care |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GOPisEvil
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. It isn't sexist...it's homophobic. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| VelmaD
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 21. No David...it's also sexist... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GOPisEvil
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 33. I don't see it that way... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| VelmaD
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:02 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 34. But why is it an insult to him? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GOPisEvil
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:05 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 37. It's fine for women to be girly, but not men. (In Arnold's tiny mind) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rbnyc
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. sexist against men and women. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 26. Well said |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rbnyc
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 27. Thanks. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| readmylips
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. In real life, Ahhnold uses the F-git word.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dr.strangelove
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. Immature yes, sexist no |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| put out
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 43. I do. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. Oh pish posh! Why get HYSTERICAL* about it? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| VelmaD
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 36. I know what you mean. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rbnyc
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:07 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 38. When I first saw the word hysterical... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 41. I don't see what's so hard to understand about it either |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rbnyc
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 46. No worries. I just read the subject line... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Selwynn
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. I don't care - it was surreal-ly hilarious (clarification inside) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Meldread
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 42. It's homophobic, because of context. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| VelmaD
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:12 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 44. Oh goodie, let's play divide and conquer... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Meldread
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 56. I agree, that he likely has a sexist mindset... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| G_j
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:47 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 57. thank you! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Selwynn
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:13 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 45. That's exactly right. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Amaya
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 47. Sexist..... hmmmm, No. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MikeG
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 48. I think I hit an effing nerve. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Moloch
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 49. He was making a stupid little joke... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MikeG
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:27 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 50. I agree. Football camp is only a week away. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| VelmaD
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 51. You know I really love these threads. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:30 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 52. Notice the percentage of those who don't 'get it' is increasing? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bunny
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:51 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 59. That is it in a nutshell. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Feanorcurufinwe
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 53. A put-down, based on sex. How could that NOT be sexist? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| VelmaD
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:36 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 54. Stunning... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CHestonsucks
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 58. Sexist? Probably, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bunny
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:52 PM Response to Reply #58 |
| 60. Well, I'll never let an insult to douchebags go unchallenged!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zorra
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 61. It is absolutely sexist. "Enron Arnie" obviously thinks women are inferior |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Deja Q
|
Mon Jul-19-04 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 63. Arnold's actions aren't worthy of someone in a prestigious position, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Toucano
|
Mon Jul-19-04 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 64. It's beyond sexist. It's MISOGYNISTIC! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rucky
|
Mon Jul-19-04 06:14 PM Response to Reply #64 |
| 68. Yep! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Piperay
|
Mon Jul-19-04 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 67. Yes, the inference that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 20th 2013, 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC