Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Illinois DUers: Will Bush be on the ballot in your state?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 07:55 PM
Original message
Illinois DUers: Will Bush be on the ballot in your state?
Last I had heard the State Board of Elections asked Attorney General Madigan (D) for an opinion before making a decision. For those of you who don't know the situation, the Republicans' decision to hold a late convention in September so as to maximize the sentimental sapp effect means that Shrub will not be nominated until after the filing deadline in many states. Some states are rolling over to chnage the deadline special just for him, but others like Illinois are moving more slowly. Democrats run the whole show in Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have spoken to a State Rep about it. . .
. . .it was the first she had heard about it, but she wanted to follow-up on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
:kick:

Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. it's not going to go Bush anyway..
it would serve them right but I don't think Illinois could be considered in play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I remember this. The Independant Party filed a complaint
They said when they missed the deadline the state would not let them put their candidate on the ballot so turnabout was fair play where Bush shouldn't be on the ballot. Just googled and found nothing new on this, so more than likely the issue quietly went away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Kick this mofo
Not allowing Shrub on the ballot would be a humiliation. So I support this.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. yeahhhh
we've got a dem guv and a dem legislature, let's push this hard with em all. if the repukes can do what they are doing in texas and calif let us do what we can!!!

i don't know the laws but but if they have to be changed to allow the boy king i imagine that at least majority would be needed. let's play hardball, folks!!!

i had heard about this for another state, anyone know which states have the early deadline and the makeup of their legislatures and guv??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. States
I mentioned Illinois because it has a Democratic controlled gov. and leg. WV is Dem. controlled, but many of those are Dixiecrats and Zell-crats, so I did not waste my time. Other states include:

Alabama: Last I heard the (D) leg. was working on it. The Republicans control the governorship, but he is on his own party's shit list right now over taxes.

Indiana: Split control leg. (D) Gov. Haven't heard anything.

Texas: Republicans run everything there and they would move the deadline to the day before election day if Karl Rove asked them to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I don't think the law should be adjusted just for Bush
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. hey bluestate
maybe you should edit the title to something like (Illinois Dems answer to texas and cali repukes), i think there is a seed here that we can use. i don't know, just a thought. wouldn't it be GREAT to not have shrub on the ballot in some states??

and a :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. They should
or they will get a hell lot of write-in votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. a kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sure he will
Just pull some of that withholding federal dollars crap. You know, the way the federal govt. neutralizes state powers like speed limits and drinking age by withholding money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiltonLeBerle Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. I went to a board of elections meeting on the topic 2 months ago...
The room was packed to overflowing(presumably because the topic was on the agenda),k and then when the meeting was starting, they pulled some parlimentary shit, and tabled the issue and closed the meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiltonLeBerle Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. but he most likely will, unfortunately-
but speaking as an election judge, I wouldn't be looking too forward to counting the write-ins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IkeWarnedUs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. I called the Board of Elections
It was a month or two ago. Steve (not sure I should give his last name) said the IL statutes didn't say anything about Federal candidates - just state, county and municipal. They gave me the statute number and I found it online. (10 ICLS 5/7-60)

http://www.legis.state.il.us/legislation/ilcs/ch10/ch10act5articles/ch10act5Sub9.htm

He said they were going to turn to the IL State Legislature to "guide" them. He said he didn't know if the IL Congress was actually going to address it or not. I asked what will happen if they don't and he said he didn't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC