Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whitewashing British Intel Report becomes bs right wing talking point.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 05:44 PM
Original message
Whitewashing British Intel Report becomes bs right wing talking point.
Edited on Thu Jul-15-04 06:00 PM by stickdog
Here is the Butler report:

http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Politics/documents/2004/07/14/butler.pdf

Starting on page 122:

In early 1999, Iraqi officials visited a number of African countries, including Niger. The visit was detected by intelligence, and some details were subsequently confirmed by Iraq. The purpose of the visit was not immediately known. But uranium ore accounts for almost three-quarters of Nigera's exports. Putting this together with past Iraqi purchases of uranium ore from Niger, the limitations faced by the Iraq regime on access to indigenous uranium ore and other evidence of Iraq seeking to restart its nuclear programme, the JIC judged that Iraqi purchase of uranium ore could have been the subject of discussions ...

During 2002, the UK received further intelligence from additional sources (which were?) which identified the purpose of the visit to Niger as having been to negotiate the purchase of uranium ore, though there was disagreement as to whether a sale had been agreed and uranium shipped.

(Wow. Sounds authoritative!)


*****


That's it. According to the text of the Butler Report, that's all the evidence for an Iraqi purchase for Niger uranium.

1) An Iraqi delegation reportedly went to Niger in 1999 causing some analysts to guess that the purpose of this trip was to obtain yellowcake based on Niger's exporting profile

and

2) Unnamed sources (can you say "exiles"?) "confirmed" this Iraqi interest in 2002, although these unnamed sources couldn't even agree if any uranium was actually purchased.

That's it. That's the sum total of the "credible evidence" that backed these "well founded" (but completely inaccurate) claims.

Meanwhile:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3891503.stm

Niger's former prime minister has said that Iraq did not try to buy uranium, contradicting claims made in the build-up to the invasion of Iraq. Ibrahim Mayaki told the BBC that no Iraqi delegation went to Niger while he was foreign minister or prime minister.

An official report into UK intelligence supported the claims that Iraq had sought to buy uranium from Niger. Although some documents backing up this claim were shown to be forgeries, the UK has not withdrawn the charge. Last week's US Senate report on the intelligence leading up to the Iraq invasion said that Saddam Hussein's government may have tried to buy uranium from Africa. Following the discovery of the forgeries, President George W Bush withdrew the charges.

Mr Mayaki denies allegations in the Senate report that he admitted meeting a delegation from Iraq in 1999.

...

"I think this could be easily verified by the Western intelligence services and by the authorities in Niger," he said.



So even the very basis of these erroneous reports was a fabrication!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. So this constitutes what even if true?
During 2002, the UK received further intelligence from additional sources (which were?) which identified the purpose of the visit to Niger as having been to negotiate the purchase of uranium ore, though there was disagreement as to whether a sale had been agreed and uranium shipped.<<

So this constitutes what even if true?

Intercontinental ballistic missiles able to reach D.C. in 45 minutes.... an imminent threat... a gathering storm... a mushroom cloud... or a fabricated reason to disappear Russian, French and German contracts with Iraq... change the payment scheme for Iraqi oil back to the dollar instead of the Euro... grab control of the oil fields... put Helliburton in position to screw the American taxpayer... push us hopelessly into debt... raid the treasury... overextend the military to the breaking point... terminally annoy most all of our allies... condemn many many men to permanent psychological scars... leave tens of thousands of others without limbs... turn the entire Muslim world against us... and just generally put your foot in it. Did I mention lying to the Amerian public?? I meant to put that in there as well.... but then... you already knew that. In all honesty.. many of these people are criminals who should do a rather lengthy stay in the pen.

PS: Many many other counties have nuclear weapons as we speak... many of them quite unfriendly to our interests... and what we have taught them is.... if you don't want the U.S. up your butt.... go nuclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. The British appear very good at "whitewashing"....
I expected a little more critical report than was given...Nobody did anything wrong...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC