Please participate in this 9-11 poll (blindside to LIHOP to MIHOP)

[Domitan]

http://www.phlogredux.org/messages/56274.html

This is another bulletin board of mostly leftists who have a very prudent view on LIHOP-MIHOP. It would be interesting if some of you can go there and offer good reasons why LIHOP and MIHOP are possible.

[MercutioATC]

1. I voted "C"

"C) Some warnings sent out beforehand and read by a number of individuals in govt or army or CIA that should have been heeded, but discarded due to laziness, premature dismissal, or neglect."

I still feel that Bush is responsible, but more through incompetence than intent.

[jeff30997]

2. After almost 4 years of...

Reading,thinking,analyzing and dismissing the crackpots conspiracy theorists,i'm more and more convinced that they LIHOP.

[democraticinsurgent]

3. mihop

i don't think there's much diff between lihop and mihop myself. complicity is complicity. if the gov't knew it was going to happen and made sure of it, well, then, they helped make it happen.

with all the coverup activity--especially the sibel edmonds gag--and all the evidence that flocco and hopsicker have uncovered about florida, there's no way it's anything less than lihop. if the feds were tracking atta and company, then they pretty much knew what was going on.

forget the missing plane theories, the pods, the wtc demolition, the phantom cell phone calls, and all the controversies that don't seem to have answers. i love a good conspiracy theory as much as the next person (probably more) but when you get right down to it, * and company have implicated themselves and their buddies with the coverup.

let's get kerry elected and force him to expose the real story. imagine how liberating it would be to be able to connect the real dots on this story. i am increasingly convinced that those dots will lead us to the truth about JFK, RFK, and MLK. Among others.

[bryant69]

5. And Area 51?

I mean I'd liek to know the truth about JFK and RFK, but isn't Area 51 a more pressing concern.

Anyway if they are powerful enough to do this and kill the mighty initials, what makes you think they don't have Kerry in their metaphorical back pocket?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com

[democraticinsurgent]

8. sarcasm detected...

i don't disagree with you actually that it's a bit of a stretch to think we're really going to find out about the 60's assassinations. it won't be kerry's doing, it'll be us, right here on du and the rest of the diligent internet researchers. IF we get some official confirmation of the neocon cabal's conspiracy on 9-11, we can follow the roads wherever they may lead.

and yes, kerry may be in the crosshairs if he digs too deep. we should all be aware of that. i suspect that's yet another reason why the * folks are upset that Edwards will be VP. It won't help to get rid of Kerry. Edwards will be a problem for them too.

[Jose Diablo]

13. 40+ years of Bush

open all the records. I'd like to see the whole bunch of them swing in Leavenworth.

[GR]

4. I Voted E After Reading The New Pearl Harbor...

The evidence presented is overwhelming...MIHOP or at the least LIHOP

[DenverDem]

6. It couldn't have happened without complicity at the top.

Cave dwelling arabs couldn't have completely circumvented the most powerful defense system in the world by themselves.

Among many other reasons.

[gollygee]

7. There's a great quote by Napoleon

"Never ascribe malice to that which is adequately explained by incompetence."

[democraticinsurgent]

9. is not adequately explained by incompetence though

...not a bad quote. but while you may be able to explain SOME of the events leading up to 9-11 to incompetence, you really have to stretch to believe all of it is incompetence.

Of course * is incompetent. But i am convinced that's part of the game. Incompetence is always preferable to malice. While the puppet masters are pulling the strings behind the scenes, the masses--even the liberal ones--focus on *'s inability to do anything right.

As the former Indiana Rep. Earl Langrebe (R) said in the early 70's in regard to the Nixon's obvious complicity in Watergate:

"Don't confuse me with the facts."

[CrispyQ]

10. I love that quote!

As intriguing as LIHOP/MIHOP theories are, there is so much truth to this quote.

[DenverDem]

11. "Never dig for the truth when you can stick you head in the sand."

Great quote by Denver Dem.

Do you remember what happened to Napoleon, BTW? He's not someone whose logic is to be revered.

[Domitan]

12. Thanks all for your replies

I'm more towards D as I feel that can hold up well in court (will fall back to C for sure)...but still not enough to convict via E.

[kerrywins]

14. voted