Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek Editorial: A Foul Mouth and Manhood

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KareBear Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:25 AM
Original message
Newsweek Editorial: A Foul Mouth and Manhood
Great read. She really sticks it to Cheney :D Hope this isn't a dupe!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5352287/site/newsweek?site=newsweek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. a great read!
Edited on Thu Jul-08-04 10:32 AM by papau
A Foul Mouth And Manhood
In recent years the Republican hard guys have surely taken over the Y-chromosome territory from the feel-your-pain Democrats

By Anna Quindlen

NewsweekJuly 12 issue - In 1962, when the New York Times quoted President John F. Kennedy during a dispute with the steel industry as saying, "My father always told me that all businessmen were sons of bitches, but I never believed it till now," the White House went ballistic. The press office complained, the publisher of the Times apologized and the AP noted that other newspapers had found the quote unfit to print.<snip>

Or the F word. Or expletive deleted. Or what have you: the powers of expurgated invention fail me. What does it mean that today it means nothing when the vice president unrepentantly uses a word in public that this magazine won't use in print? It means that standards have changed since 1962. Not just standards of obscenity—standards of masculinity.

Dick Cheney's decision to advise Sen. Patrick Leahy to perform an anatomically impossible sex act (thereby creating a journalistically impossible quotation situation) has been discussed in terms of the rise of the potty mouth. After all, the F word is still considered so beyond the pale that when Bono used it at the Golden Globes, the chair of the FCC called it "abhorrent," and when John Kerry paired it with "up" to describe Iraq policy in a interview, the president's chief of staff described himself as "disappointed."

The Cheney flap triggers the hypocrisy meter, since neither of those (Republican) officials has described the vice president's language as abhorrent or disappointing. And it raises the trickle-down question, too. If the vice president of the country feels comfortable—nay, exultant—about using the word on the Senate floor, can the vice president of the student council be far behind? I can't wait for the principal's reaction the first time a smart teenager offers the Cheney defense verbatim:

"He had challenged my integrity. And I didn't like that. But most of all I didn't like the fact that after he had done so, then he wanted to act like everything's peaches and cream. And I informed him of my view of his conduct in no uncertain terms. And, as I say, I felt better afterwards."<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. My personal "abhorrent" meter is off the scale
these scum have ruined it forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Cheney says telling Leahy to fuck himself was informing him
"of my view of his conduct".

What an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC