Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TIN FOIL HAT ALERT: Does Ken Lay Indictment = DEFINITE terror attack???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CaptainMidnight Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:11 PM
Original message
TIN FOIL HAT ALERT: Does Ken Lay Indictment = DEFINITE terror attack???
Gang,

Remember how 9-11 wiped out all those pesky Wall Street and corporate fraud cases being "investigated" by the SEC?

To say nothing of any TRUE "investigation" of the 2000 Stolen Election and the TRUE FACTS of who actually won the recount?

To say nothing of the fact that SUPPOSEDLY most of Enron records and other SEC case records were conveeeeeeeeeeeeniently stored in World Trade Center Building #7?

http://www.wtc7.net/about.html

I know, Enron's implosion took place AFTER 9-11, but they knew it was coming, like the pending Stock Market crash. 9-11 allowed our government to uh, ahem, "get their priorities straight," and to start fighting terrorism, as opposed to pursuing any pissant fraud cases.

AND REMEMBER on CBS News on September TENTH? Whereby Rumsfeld and the Pentagon admitted to 2 TRILLION DOLLARS gone MISSING from the Pentagon Budget and Treasury? I thought that a startling "admission," and went to bed that night thinking that that story actually had some "legs." By the time I woke up the next morning at 9am PST, the Twin Towers were GONE.

Just wondering if anyone else is thinking like me: they'll announce the indictment of Ken Lay, and then the next EXPECTED TERROR ATTACK, which the White House and the US MEDIA is TOTALLY "MEME" - ing us with, getting us used to the idea, which is supposed to be WORSE THAN 9-11, will completely shove Ken Lay's indictment not only off the media headlines, but off the Justice Department's "to-do list."

Tin Foil Hat, or Intuition?

Captain Mike
PS: believe it or not, I HATE thinking this way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. At least an elevated alert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it's in lieu of another orange alert.
BushCo knows a terror alert today would be too obvious.

Sacrificing Kenny Boy for the cause is a new way to divert attention from JK/JE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. The whole WTC7 story has always been a bit too tinfoily for my taste.
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptainMidnight Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. dude
reveal!

WHY?

Have you examined it or spent any time looking at the circumstances, studying the videos, considering the "physics" of such?

Again, I'm not onboard with EVERY tinfoil hat theory, but MANY of them have been proven to be true.

I'm still NOT convinced about the "no plane hit the Pentaon" theory, but that damned hole looks awfully small.

But WTC #7...

Could you elaborate?

Thanx,
Captain Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Explosive charges set up inside building BEFORE the planes hit?
And nobody noticed? Come on.

I do think it's possible that the NYFD brought down the building due to safety concerns. I'm no structural engineer, but it's not unrealistic to think that the seismic disturbance of two 100-story buildings crashing to the ground across the street could easily have rendered the building uninhabitable.

It's hard for me to believe that WTC7 was an intended secondary target in a MIHOP operation to cover-up financial misdeeds and government secrets.

-MR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. stop trippin'
Edited on Wed Jul-07-04 04:27 PM by elehhhhna
A smart person would do the attack firs, then let the whole matter "LAY" there for awhile...dontcha think Ashkroft could delay this indictment if he wanted to? I think the reeps know their goose is cooked and Kenny & the Plame outers must be indicted before the election.

The Pretzelpants can PARDON any time after indictment--not just after a conviction. Once Bush's de-selected he will pardon them all by Thanksgiving. Maybe Christmas. If they steal the selection this year watch for a very sloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow (like 4 year) trial & appeals process with pardons in 2008.



edit for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Puh-leeez... any tinfoiler worth his... uh, tinfoil should know
that this is just a ploy to get The Good Hair Pair off the front page~ only need for Code Orange will be if it doesn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptainMidnight Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. No, no, no...and NO!
I acknowledge that the TIMING of the ANNOUNCEMENT of the indictment could distract us from Kerry/Edwards' announcement,

BUT the MEANING of my original posting has nothing to do with any issue TIMING. I mean, OVERALL, the FACT that they're announcing ANY INDICTMENT at all is on par with them releasing on SEPTEMBER TENTH, 2001, the story that Donald Rumsfeld was going to investigate how the Pentagon could have lost 2 TRILLION dollars.

I wonder if they're announcing the indictment of Lay because they know that, after the forthcoming CATASTROPHIC TERROR ATTACK, indicting him will no longer be a PRIORITY.

I mean, Lay knows where ALL THE BODIES ARE BURIED with regard to Bush Fraud and shady business deals. HOW can the allow him to be indicted?

Is that clear?

Captain Mike

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donhakman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Which do you buy
Alcoa or generic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nah, Lay's supposed to deflect from the July Surprise story
But Surprise! I don't think it will work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. and the next day (today 7/8) Ridge warns of major terror attack
wow cap'n. You were at least close.

be afraid! boo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptainMidnight Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. okay, that's about halfway
but I think Ridge's announcement is to NOW REMOVE KENNYBOY FROM THE HEADLINES,
but, again, to plant the MEME that YES there WILL be a massive attack soon, and prosecuting KB will just have to WAIT!

Captain Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. No, it = definite pardon
He probably pushed for the indictment pronto so he has a chance to be found guilty and pardoned before about mid-January next year. As the junta sinks faster in the polls, the corporate crooks will be beating a path to DAs across the land to get their asses arrested and tried ASAP.

No body wants to risk prison time for the duration of the coming Democratic administrationS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xocolatl Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Probably true....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC