Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Handover: Too Little, Too Soon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 09:31 AM
Original message
The Handover: Too Little, Too Soon
The handover of political authority from U.S. Administrator L. Paul Bremer and the Coalition Provisional Authority to interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi should have been a major step of great significance for coalition forces.

Unfortunately, it won’t.

For more then a year, the CPA has moved slowly and ineffectively in returning power to the Iraqi people. There has been no sense of urgency in restoring government functions and making provisions for the Iraqi people to have a livelihood. Programs to establish police and other security forces had long-term objectives, but no short-term execution.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/06/28/opinion/main626355.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Overlooking the obvious
The greatest failure after the invasion was the inability to find in-country personnel to take over the functions of government immediately. Unlike Haiti, where there was a clear "opposition government" ready to step in and take control there was no such entity in Iraq. Pentagon planners had mistakenly believed that Chalabi and others like him would be greeted as returning heroes and easily step into positions of legitimate authority. As with so many other issues in Iraq, the Pentagon was dead wrong.

There is no Iraqi George Washington. The failure to identify or even groom such a person around whom the Iraqi people could unite was and remains the biggest failure of the CPA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Dead wrong"
Was the Pentagon dead wrong or more specifically (and importantly) the Office of Special Plans dead wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good Point
Although I suppose you could say the Pentagon was wrong to the extent that Rummy bought the OSP bullshit hook, line, and sinker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC