Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LIHOPpers/MIHOPpers - Are you pissed at Moore

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Delano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:06 PM
Original message
LIHOPpers/MIHOPpers - Are you pissed at Moore
for not implying any BushCo complicity in F-911?

Just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Democratic discussion forum
   Replies to this thread
  - i saw some implication of that  AZDemDist6   Jun-27-04 03:08 PM   #1 
  - At this point, all we need is to support Michael. Being pissed for one  LittleApple81   Jun-27-04 03:08 PM   #2 
  - Well, I went yesterday and enjoyed the film immensely.  Delano   Jun-27-04 03:12 PM   #11 
  - Nope  Must_B_Free   Jun-27-04 03:08 PM   #3 
  - No, because to have any credibility with mainstream viewers,  Lydia Leftcoast   Jun-27-04 03:09 PM   #4 
  - nah...but wish he'd have brought up black box voting, '04 Florida scrub...  codegreen   Jun-27-04 03:09 PM   #5 
  - I Agree  StandUpGuy   Jun-27-04 05:26 PM   #26 
  - Absolutely not!!  MindPilot   Jun-27-04 03:10 PM   #6 
  - Naw, he really couldn't  steviet_2003   Jun-27-04 03:10 PM   #7 
  - no  number6   Jun-27-04 03:10 PM   #8 
  - I personally lean toward  leeroysphits   Jun-27-04 03:10 PM   #9 
  - A LIHOPer/MIHOPer got pissed during the screening I went to...  jjmalonejr   Jun-27-04 03:12 PM   #10 
  - How do you know he was not a freeper?  efhmc   Jun-27-04 03:13 PM   #12 
  - Most freepers are generally not familiar with LIHOP/MIHOP and infowars.com  jjmalonejr   Jun-27-04 03:44 PM   #18 
  - tinfoilers usually are jerks  ZombyWoof   Jun-27-04 03:26 PM   #16 
     - Amen. /nt  TomNickell   Jun-27-04 05:22 PM   #25 
  - If he covered everything I would like included  chelaque liberal   Jun-27-04 03:14 PM   #13 
  - no  amazona   Jun-27-04 03:19 PM   #14 
  - That would have been too much for anybody but "the choir" to digest.  stickdog   Jun-27-04 03:25 PM   #15 
  - Not at all.  benburch   Jun-27-04 03:33 PM   #17 
  - Okay,I give up! What does LIHOP and MIHOP mean?  candy   Jun-27-04 03:50 PM   #19 
  - The theories that BushCo either...  Delano   Jun-27-04 03:54 PM   #20 
     - Gotcha! Thanks again.  candy   Jun-27-04 03:56 PM   #21 
  - Baby steps  LunaC   Jun-27-04 04:10 PM   #22 
  - Gee, let's pick one of the bravest men in the world - Michael Moore  Myra   Jun-27-04 05:07 PM   #23 
  - Are you kidding me?  RatTerrier   Jun-27-04 05:16 PM   #24 
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. i saw some implication of that
very subtle, but there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. At this point, all we need is to support Michael. Being pissed for one
reason or another is not going to help us. If we get him out, we have a chance to investigate. And he is controversial enough in his film (from what I hear, because I have no theater within 150 miles to be able to watch it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Well, I went yesterday and enjoyed the film immensely.
I'm looking fortward to the DVD, and hoping it includes a lot of what was left out of the theatrical release (though I'm not expecting any LIHOP/MIHOP stuff)

Although I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Bushco did pull a LIHOP (I would be surprised if it was MIHOP), I really don't think there's enough evidence to make a compelling case for it at all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nope
he calculated his best shot and took it.

You can't do everything. He picked what best he could prove, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, because to have any credibility with mainstream viewers,
he had to stick with facts that he could document.

I think you could read LIHOP or MIHOP between the lines, but the evidence Moore presents is damning enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codegreen Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. nah...but wish he'd have brought up black box voting, '04 Florida scrub...
Edited on Sun Jun-27-04 03:10 PM by codegreen
would have made a good full circle to the beginning of the film to discuss that near the end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandUpGuy Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. I Agree
I think though that the Dem's in general don't want people to think that there is no point in voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Absolutely not!!
The focus was how Bush USED 9-11 to advance his agenda. The "how" and "why" of 9-11 itself is so complex, I think any attempt to address that in the movie would've just given THEM more ammo to attack Moore's cred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Naw, he really couldn't
If he would have just blatantly came out with it the whole production would have been quickly dismissed. He put enough facts out there for the sheeple to wonder, though, and to want some more answers, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. no
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. I personally lean toward
MIHOP but until some enterprising, brave (and probably non-existent) journalist or official reveals some fairly incontrovertible facts concerning this I think it only hurts our cause to bring it up and makes us look like conspiracy theorist "kooks"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jjmalonejr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. A LIHOPer/MIHOPer got pissed during the screening I went to...
...declared "That's it!" in the middle of the movie, got up, started to walk out and yelled "This is BULLSHIT!" from the back of the theater and started to go on a rant, citing www.infowars.com etc.

People told him to shut up and get out so we could watch the movie.

He was a jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. How do you know he was not a freeper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jjmalonejr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Most freepers are generally not familiar with LIHOP/MIHOP and infowars.com
Plus I live in Hollywood.

Not many freepers here, but lots of tinfoil hatters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. tinfoilers usually are jerks
They have a paranoid, immature persecution complex. Just witness how they behave on DU.

Moore pretty much said that there was no grand conspiracy behind Carlyle - that their sole purpose was to make money, and lots of it.

Profit is the only language repukes understand. Once you understand that, there is no need for fanciful flights of paranoid fancy.

Too bad for the tinfoiler. Moore didn't tell him what he wanted to hear about Carlyle, and didn't even mention Skull & Bones, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomNickell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Amen. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelaque liberal Donating Member (981 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. If he covered everything I would like included
the movie would have to be 10 hours long. I think it got a little too diluted as it was, ie the Oregon trooper. Important stuff, needs to be told, but it can't all happen at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. no
While I'm satisfied that * knew something was coming and let it happen, this film was about putting facts out there and leaving the speculation and inferences to the viewer. I don't have a problem with taking that tack, indeed, I think it makes the film more watchable for a lot of people. Some will cry sensationalism any way, but the film bends over backwards to avoid even a hint of sensationalism to my mind, and that's a good thing when trying to attract a wider audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. That would have been too much for anybody but "the choir" to digest.
Edited on Sun Jun-27-04 03:25 PM by stickdog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. Not at all.
Moore had a particular case to make and he made it. LIHOP would have detracted from that considerably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Okay,I give up! What does LIHOP and MIHOP mean?
I've only been around a couple of months?

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. The theories that BushCo either...
Let It Happen Op or Made It Happen Op - as in covert ops...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Gotcha! Thanks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. Baby steps
Like a raw egg, one must crack the shell of the sheeple psyche gently, calmly and slowly. Moore gave the 'merikun public the first taste of "Bush* is EVIL" to wrap their little brains around. The seed has been planted. All else will fall into place in time. Patience, Grasshopper. Patience.

Now if anyone wants to stoke the fire with gasoline, print out copies of the following tidbits as handouts for the folks leaving the theatre in stunned outrage and see if you can generate another lightbulb going on......

*****************************************************************

So far, no one has offered a plausible explanation for the following sequence of events:

In May 2001 the U.S. State Department met with Iran, German and Italian officials to discuss Afghanistan. It was decided that the ruling Taliban would be toppled and a "broad-based government" would control the country so a gas pipeline could be built there.

http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/7969.pdf .
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex20867.htm


Even as plans were being made to remove the Taliban rulers from power, Colin Powell announced a $43 million "gift" to Afghanistan.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-09170...
http://www.cato.org/dailys/08-02-02.html


Meanwhile, the U.S. Embassy in the UAE received a call that Bin Laden supporters were in the U.S. planning attacks with explosives. It was rumored that Bin Laden was interested in hijacking U.S. aircraft.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/images/04/10/whitehouse.pdf

In June 2001 the decades-old procedure for a quick response by the nation’s air defense was changed. NORAD’s military commanders could no longer issue the command to launch fighter jets because approval had to be sought from the civilian Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld.

http://www.observer.com/pages/frontpage2.asp

In July 2001, the private plot formulated in May for toppling the Taliban was divulged during the G8 summit in Genoa, Italy. Immediately after the conference, American, Russian, German and Pakistani officials secretly met in Berlin to finalize the strategy for military strikes against the Taliban, scheduled to begin before mid-October 2001

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1550366.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,55...


In September 2001 the "catastrophic and catalyzing" modern-day Pearl Harbor envisioned years earlier by the White House members of the PNAC came to pass when the WTC and Pentagon were attacked with U.S. aircraft. Immediately, the finger of blame was pointed at Osama bin Laden, a former CIA operative with ties to Afghanistan. Suddenly, the U.S. "gift" of $43 million to the Taliban in May was cast in a new light. Coincidentally, Pakistan had participated in the plan to attack Afghanistan and the chief of Pakistan's Inter Service Intelligence agency was later linked to a 911 hijacker after wiring him $100,00 just days before the WTC fell.

http://cryptome.org/rad.htm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/...


In October 2001, with flags waving, crowds cheering, and anthems playing, the "War On Terror" and the hunt for Osama began when Afghanistan was attacked right on schedule of July's secret meeting

For details on the PNAC coup of the White House see "The Whispering Campaign" link below.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. Gee, let's pick one of the bravest men in the world - Michael Moore
And pick apart everything he does.

No one film can describe every crime of the Bush klan.
There aren't enough hours.

I'm grateful for what he has in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. Are you kidding me?
LIHOP/MIHOP in his film would have ruined him. Nobody's ready to believe that stuff yet!

Patience, young grasshoppers. Patience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 21st 2013, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC