Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone know anything about the CBC meeting with Nader?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 01:57 PM
Original message
Does anyone know anything about the CBC meeting with Nader?
I wish I was real adept with photoshop so I could but the face of Elijah Cummings doing an Atomic Drop on Nader.

http://www.hillnews.com/news/042804/nader.aspx

I love this:

He said he anticipated a “very friendly meeting” because Nader and CBC members will “probably agree on many things.”

If by "very friendly" you mean very harsh verbal de-pantsings. Anyone got any info?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tim4319 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. From what I understand
It became a very heated discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. From earlier today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. He essentially told them to "stick it."
Reminding them that, despite the efforts of their DC colleagues, opposing political views are still permitted in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What does Nader care
that the black unemployment rate went way down under Clinton and has gone back up under Bush?

What does Nader care that black votes were not counted in Florida in 2000?

What does Nader care about the black vote period?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ralph cares mostly about himself, I suspect.
But he has every right to run his ill-fated campaign none-the-less.

Any movement that openly challenges the two-party grift we have going now is not a threat, in my opinion. Just a little ahead of its time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Of course Nader has the right to run
and I have the right to say that I think he is doing so in order to gratify his ego, even though he knows he is enabling evil people to take over our country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Right
Mr. Nader and his supporters just loooove to lecture us about what he has the "right" to do. I just love that strawman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Just how is that fact a strawman?
Do tell ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Nader's
defense of his run as "his constitutional right" serves to stiffen his oposition on the left because he comes off as lecturing or educating us about his rights as if we don't know what his rights are. He's drawing attention away from the real issue here which is not whether he has the right to run but how his run may serve to help get bush re-elected. It's a strawman.

The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Speaking of strawmen:
"He's drawing attention away from the real issue here which is not whether he has the right to run but how his run * may * serve to help get bush re-elected."

He may not. No?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. My ass might fall if when I get up from this seat.
It may it may not. No?

Are you willing to risk it just four years after he *probably* spoiled one election?

Hey, after all, he may or he may not have helped to get Shrimpy elected. Can you at least conceed that he helped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Absolutely. But can you conceed ...
that Gore was not going to become President, even if the GOP had to use everything in their bag of dirty tricks, including but not limited to:

-- Five conservative Supreme Court judges
(two of whom owe their posiions to a man named Bush)

-- A corporate media onslaught

-- The systematic disenfranchisment of tens of thousands of voters

-- Jeb Bush, Katherine Harris

-- Recruiting GOP staff and supporters to stage a protest

-- Questionable decisions regrading Gore's campaign


Suddenly frumpy Ralph Nader and his 3% look rather small in the big picture, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. No. I can't.
But I can conceed that your list was a formidable and overwhelming force for Mr. Gor to try and overcome. Mr. Nader was just one more thing to throw on top of the heap of circumstances that Mr. Gore had to contend with.

After all, he did win the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. and the endless Naderlies about Gore
You forgot that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. You obviously don't know what a "straw man" is
A straw man is a rebuttal to an argument that no one has made. When Nadirites argue that "Nader has a right to run", they are rebutting the argument that "Nadir does NOT have the right to run". Unfortunately, no one has argued that "Nadir does NOT have the right to run", so it is a straw man.

As far as whether or not Nadir's run may or may not help get Bush* re-selected, both sides of that argument have been made, so rebutting it can NOT be a straw man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. yeah...democrats sure cared about the florida disenfranchisement
i think gore hemmed and hawed about it on tavis smiley, but failed to make it an issue during the recount fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. "Gore" is not "the democrats"
Plenty of democrats were upset about it, but it was Gore who poured cold water on the idea. And according to the DU conventional "wisdom", this occurred sometime AFTER he disavowed the DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. i know it...i am talking about GORE the candidate
and as such, the leader of the party not making it an issue at the most critical time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. opposing political views ??
What has Nadir opposed when he's not trying to ruin an election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. yup and opposing Nader is permitted too
Something his supporters would like us to stop doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nader needs to bow out
Hopefully at aome point, Nader will drop out of this race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. he wont
Nader is perfect and everything he does is perfect. How could he stop doing something perfect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'd like to hear what Maxine Waters had to say to his sorry ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Wish
Cynthia McKinney could have been there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Speaking of Elijah Cummings. Please explain this:
Apparently, Ralph Nader is more of a threat than fundie-favorite Washington Times owner, crowned savior of humanity, Rev. Moon.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1843592
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. ...
All have I have to say to that is:

In an interview yesterday, Cummings said, "I don't recall saying that. That may have been confused with what I was saying" about Bishop Joseph Showell, a constituent being honored.

It's suspect, yes. In my mind, the verdict is still out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. ...
All have I have to say to that is:

In an interview yesterday, Cummings said, "I don't recall saying that. That may have been confused with what I was saying" about Bishop Joseph Showell, a constituent being honored.

It's suspect, yes. In my mind, the verdict is still out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. And yet, a Nader candidacy is a threat and only helps Bush?
Seems to me, Rev. Moon and his media empire have done far more damage to Democrats than Ralph Nader. Yet, I see many black congressional members line up to honor this self proclaimed "second coming of Christ."

Who's kidding whom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. based on what?
" Seems to me, Rev. Moon and his media empire have done far more damage to Democrats than Ralph Nader"

got stats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. do you...have any statistics, that is?
are you saying nader is MORE damaging to democrats than the RW media? have any stats to back that up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. look at the polls with and without Nader in the race
In general he takes five points from Kerry for everyone he takes from bush. Those polls have been posted here on DU for days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. haven't seen them...is the 5% the deciding factor for bush?
if so...clearly kerry is in more trouble than nader explains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. First straw men, now red herrings
Big fan of the logical fallacies, are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Nope. I just love fish, I guess.
Mmmmmmmmmm ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. the only thing I heard is that they ripped him a new one
Good for them. They know what is at stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Please tell me what is at stake, Cheswick?
And while you are at it, how is kissing the ass of one of the biggest Bush supporters working toward achieving that aim?

Rev. Moon has not called for the impeachment of George W. Bush. Ralph Nader has, however ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. fascincating, isn't it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. Sad, really.
But not surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. nope...not at all surprising
such is life in these united states...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. You are a fan of logical fallacies
Edited on Wed Jun-23-04 04:28 PM by hiphopnation23
as you cannot prove that the CBC is "kissing the ass of one of the biggest Bush supporters". You base this statement on a quote that has be repudiated by the CBC chariman. Care to explain?

On another note, no one here is defending Rev. Moon but you imply that we are, because we oppose Nader, with statements like this one: "Rev. Moon has not called for the impeachment of George W. Bush. Ralph Nader has, however ..."

Please get some of this straight and get back to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. I will not simply ignore the fact that ...
Some of the same folks, (who are working to quash a progressive third party candidacy,) are the same elected officials who have kind words and campaign checks from a notoriously corrupt GOP supporter.

I'm just trying to make sense of the logic, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Again
you're averting attention away from my point. You seem to be quite adept at this! You're correct in not ignoring this. I'm not either.

The point is that you cannot prove that anyone in the CBC has accepted campaign checks from reverend moon and you still haven't addressed the fact that you tie contempt for Nader to support of reverend moon, a logical fallacy indeed. Care to explain yet?

If not, think about it before you get back to me cuz I'm getting dizzy with all your spin. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Make of this, what you will:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61932-2004Jun22.html

"Davis said in an interview that he is a lifelong Methodist who does not agree with many of Moon's religious teachings. But he praised Moon's efforts to promote world peace. Davis said that some Moon associates have donated money to his congressional campaigns, but that that has nothing to do with his support for Moon's organization.

The prominent role played by Davis, Fauntroy and Stallings, among
others, reflects Moon's efforts to reach out to the black community.
Jenkins said many African American clergy members "have become
strong allies" of Moon because they sympathize with the "mistreatment and labeling" he has faced."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. I sure will.
Thanks for the (dis)info and the (unanswered) questions. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. you don't know what is at stake?
Not surprising since if you did you would not be defending Nader.
Sorry I only tutor people for money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Answer the question, professor.
Or do I need to raise my hand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. pupil...
see post #36
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. Seems like a waste of money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
42. I think they pretty much told him to go to hell.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC