Charlie Brown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 04:43 PM
Original message |
| Libertarian candidate detained from flight |
|
Gary Nolan was barred from a flight to Atlanta because his name was apparently on a no-fly list of potential terroritsts. http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/election/0504natio... You may need to subscribe to view, but I think it's free.
|
mot78
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. At least Kerry wouldn't do that to Nader if he was POTUS |
|
Is * really that afraid of the Libertarians? They're too liberal on social issues to get RW votes, and too conservative on economics to get Liberal voters.
|
LondonAmerican
(438 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
it's because most of the libertarian movement has been very strongly antiwar. The 'Republicans' need to start taking their party's name seriously and stop trying to impose a police state. B*stards.
|
mot78
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. The Libertarians are an alternative to the GOP, but not entirely |
|
I agree with those people on social issues, but I wonder if they were dropped on their heads when they were little when they talk about repealing food inspection laws and abolishing the minimum wage.
|
LondonAmerican
(438 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. They are an alternative to the GOP |
|
Edited on Tue May-25-04 05:41 PM by LondonAmerican
but perhaps not one that is fully to your liking may be a better way of putting it. I tend to agree with them on most things -- though I disagree with some things: the idea of abolishing a minimum wage, for instance.
At the end of the day no party is 100% to anyone's liking, nor is any ideology.
But the libertarians are way more principled than either of the two 'major' parties and in general I think the country would be way better off being run on libertarian priciples than neocon/fundamentalist or redistributive/paleoliberal ones. (I depart from hardcore libertarianism insofar as they do not recognise obligations on the part of individuals back to the larger community -- I disagree with republicans and with most democrats on what those obligations should be.)
Still more interesting, for me, would be a democratic party that would be reorganised along more libertarian lines. The republicans are beyond hope, but there are enough common points with democrats --especially on foreign and social policy -- that could make that attractive.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 24th 2013, 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |