Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Third-Party Threat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-04 12:17 AM
Original message
Bush's Third-Party Threat
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/21/politics/main...

Bush's Third-Party Threat
NEW YORK, May 21, 2004

By David Paul Kuhn,
CBSNews.com Chief Political Writer

While Democrats fret over the possibility of Ralph Nader causing them to lose another election by stealing votes on the left, President Bush may face an even greater third-party threat from the right wing. The Libertarian Party nominee could cost Mr. Bush his job in 2004.

With conservatives upset over the ballooning size of the federal government under a Republican White House and Congress and a portion of the political right having opposed the war in Iraq from the outset or else dismayed at how it's being handled the Libertarian nominee may do for Democrats in 2004 what Nader did for Republicans in 2000.

It is a hypothesis not yet made in the mainstream media. But interviews with third-party experts and activists across the country, as well as recent political patterns, illustrate that there could be a conservative rear-guard political attack against President Bush.

Libertarians will be on at least 49 state ballots, several more than the most optimistic expectations of Nader. While Democrats rally around their nominee, the base of the Republican Party is showing some signs of fragmentation.

(more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nah.
The moderates who might actually prefer the Libertarian candidate...I could imagine them being practical and voting Republican anyways, or maybe voting for Kerry to create gridlock between the Republican congress and a Democratic president. I think if you wanna cause a split you'd have to attack Bush* from the far-right, or with a protectionist conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. If prior Libertarian percentages are any indication...
... they're not going to be significant this year, either. Now, if the Roy Moore campaign were to develop any traction (which doesn't seem likely), the combination of Libertarians and Moore could be troublesome.

Still, I think the defining characteristic of this campaign is not going to be the Libertarians, but Bush himself and the people running him. If Democrats pay attention, are savvy to Rove's very old tricks, they can deflect them, while Bush implodes of his own dead weight.

"The weapon of mass destruction most worrisome to this country right now is George W. Bush."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Semi_subversive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-04 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I hope Roy Moore's candidacy
moves some more of those dumbass MFs away from Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceProgProsp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. The thing that makes no sense to me is this:
Once you convince 99.9% of your potential voters that if they vote for the third party you lose, the only people who will not vote for you are either people who don't want you to win, or don't care if you lose.

Just because liberterians are on the right side of the spectrum doesn't mean they're going to vote for Bush if there is no Liberterian candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-04 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Michael Peroutka another threat, help both get on the ballot nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-04 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush is going to feel first hand, what Nader did to Gore...
Nader will be draining votes from the Right this time, not the Left.
I don't think the Libertarians will bother running anyone. This race has become very expensive. The majority are interested in dumping Bush and Kerry is in the right place at the right time..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 22nd 2014, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC