a question about Andy's question

[moof]

When Andy asked on 60 minutes tonight,

------------------
The image of one bad young woman with a naked man on a leash did
more to damage America's reputation than all the good things we've
done over the years ever helped our reputation.

Where were your officers?
If someone told you to do it, tell us who told you.

What were the secrets they were trying to get from captured Iraqis?
----------------

Both these questions should be asked without let up until one of the war criminals answers them.

From the very beginning it seemed odd that someone in as deep and as hot a water as the people in the pictures would not say who ordered them.
Is there some bit of military law that makes it so that if a lower ranked person says something bad about a higher ranked person the lower person is toast without absolute proof of what was said ?

Not that it's high on the list but the other thing that is a little odd about the wedding war crime. So far it has only been described by the war criminals as an attack of a "suspected" safe house ??!!!!!!!
So when did it get to be OK to bomb to rubble any dwelling in Iraq that is " suspected ", call it being a liberal but it seems that almost every house and building in Iraq would be able to qualify for destruction under that rule of engagement. Then again maybe that is the answer.